Muscle memory in humans: evidence for myonuclear permanence and long-term transcriptional regulation after strength training

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Physiology-London Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1113/JP285675
Kristoffer Toldnes Cumming, Stefan Markus Reitzner, Marit Hanslien, Kenneth Skilnand, Olivier R. Seynnes, Oscar Horwath, Niklas Psilander, Carl Johan Sundberg, Truls Raastad
{"title":"Muscle memory in humans: evidence for myonuclear permanence and long-term transcriptional regulation after strength training","authors":"Kristoffer Toldnes Cumming,&nbsp;Stefan Markus Reitzner,&nbsp;Marit Hanslien,&nbsp;Kenneth Skilnand,&nbsp;Olivier R. Seynnes,&nbsp;Oscar Horwath,&nbsp;Niklas Psilander,&nbsp;Carl Johan Sundberg,&nbsp;Truls Raastad","doi":"10.1113/JP285675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n \n <div>The objective of this work was to investigate myonuclear permanence and transcriptional regulation as mechanisms for cellular muscle memory after strength training in humans. Twelve untrained men and women performed 10 weeks of unilateral elbow-flexor strength training followed by 16 weeks of de-training. Thereafter, 10 weeks’ re-training was conducted with both arms: the previously trained arm and the contralateral untrained control arm. Muscle biopsies were taken from the trained arm before and after both training periods and from the control arm before and after re-training. Muscle biopsies were analysed for fibre cross-sectional area (fCSA), myonuclei and global transcriptomics (RNA sequencing). During the first training period, myonuclei increased in type 1 (13 ± 17%) and type 2 (33 ± 23%) fibres together with a 30 ± 43% non-significant increase in mixed fibre fCSA (<i>P</i> = 0.069). Following de-training, fCSA decreased in both fibre types, whereas myonuclei were maintained, resulting in 33% higher myonuclear number in previously trained <i>vs</i>. control muscle in type 2 fibres. Furthermore, in the previously trained muscle, three differentially expressed genes (DEGs; <i>EGR1</i>, <i>MYL5</i> and <i>COL1A1</i>) were observed. Following re-training, the previously trained muscle showed larger type 2 fCSA compared to the control (<i>P</i> = 0.035). However, delta change in type 2 fCSA was not different between muscles. Gene expression was more dramatically changed in the control arm (1338 DEGs) than in the previously trained arm (822 DEGs). The sustained higher number of myonuclei in the previously trained muscle confirms myonuclear accretion and permanence in humans. Nevertheless, because of the unclear effect on the subsequent hypertrophy with re-training, the physiological benefit remains to be determined.\n\n <figure>\n <div><picture>\n <source></source></picture><p></p>\n </div>\n </figure>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Key points</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Muscle memory is a cellular mechanism that describes the capacity of skeletal muscle fibres to respond differently to training stimuli if the stimuli have been previously encountered.</li>\n \n <li>This study overcomes past methodological limitations related to the choice of muscles and analytical procedures.</li>\n \n <li>We show that myonuclear number is increased after strength training and maintained during de-training.</li>\n \n <li>Increased myonuclear number and differentially expressed genes related to muscle performance and development in the previously trained muscle did not translate into a clearly superior responses during re-training. Because of the unclear effect on the subsequent hypertrophy and muscle strength gain with re-training, the physiological benefit remains to be determined.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physiology-London","volume":"602 17","pages":"4171-4193"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1113/JP285675","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physiology-London","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/JP285675","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this work was to investigate myonuclear permanence and transcriptional regulation as mechanisms for cellular muscle memory after strength training in humans. Twelve untrained men and women performed 10 weeks of unilateral elbow-flexor strength training followed by 16 weeks of de-training. Thereafter, 10 weeks’ re-training was conducted with both arms: the previously trained arm and the contralateral untrained control arm. Muscle biopsies were taken from the trained arm before and after both training periods and from the control arm before and after re-training. Muscle biopsies were analysed for fibre cross-sectional area (fCSA), myonuclei and global transcriptomics (RNA sequencing). During the first training period, myonuclei increased in type 1 (13 ± 17%) and type 2 (33 ± 23%) fibres together with a 30 ± 43% non-significant increase in mixed fibre fCSA (P = 0.069). Following de-training, fCSA decreased in both fibre types, whereas myonuclei were maintained, resulting in 33% higher myonuclear number in previously trained vs. control muscle in type 2 fibres. Furthermore, in the previously trained muscle, three differentially expressed genes (DEGs; EGR1, MYL5 and COL1A1) were observed. Following re-training, the previously trained muscle showed larger type 2 fCSA compared to the control (P = 0.035). However, delta change in type 2 fCSA was not different between muscles. Gene expression was more dramatically changed in the control arm (1338 DEGs) than in the previously trained arm (822 DEGs). The sustained higher number of myonuclei in the previously trained muscle confirms myonuclear accretion and permanence in humans. Nevertheless, because of the unclear effect on the subsequent hypertrophy with re-training, the physiological benefit remains to be determined.

Key points

  • Muscle memory is a cellular mechanism that describes the capacity of skeletal muscle fibres to respond differently to training stimuli if the stimuli have been previously encountered.
  • This study overcomes past methodological limitations related to the choice of muscles and analytical procedures.
  • We show that myonuclear number is increased after strength training and maintained during de-training.
  • Increased myonuclear number and differentially expressed genes related to muscle performance and development in the previously trained muscle did not translate into a clearly superior responses during re-training. Because of the unclear effect on the subsequent hypertrophy and muscle strength gain with re-training, the physiological benefit remains to be determined.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人类的肌肉记忆:力量训练后肌核永久性和长期转录调节的证据。
这项工作的目的是研究肌核永久性和转录调控作为人类力量训练后细胞肌肉记忆的机制。12 名未经训练的男性和女性进行了为期 10 周的单侧肘关节屈伸力量训练,随后进行了为期 16 周的停训。之后,对两只手臂进行为期 10 周的再训练:之前受过训练的手臂和对侧未受训练的对照手臂。在两个训练期之前和之后,分别从接受训练的手臂和重新训练之前和之后从对照组手臂提取肌肉活检组织。对肌肉活检组织进行纤维横截面积(fCSA)、肌核和全局转录组学(RNA 测序)分析。在第一次训练期间,1型(13 ± 17%)和2型(33 ± 23%)纤维中的肌核增加,混合纤维横截面积(fCSA)增加了30 ± 43%,但不显著(P = 0.069)。去训练后,两种纤维类型的 fCSA 均下降,而肌核保持不变,结果是先前训练过的肌肉与对照组相比,2 型纤维的肌核数量增加了 33%。此外,在之前接受过训练的肌肉中,观察到三个差异表达基因(DEGs:EGR1、MYL5 和 COL1A1)。重新训练后,与对照组相比,先前训练过的肌肉显示出更大的 2 型 fCSA(P = 0.035)。然而,不同肌肉之间 2 型 fCSA 的 delta 变化并无差异。与先前接受过训练的手臂(822 个 DEGs)相比,对照组手臂(1338 个 DEGs)的基因表达变化更为显著。先前接受过训练的肌肉中肌核数量持续较高,这证实了人类肌核的增生和持久性。不过,由于再训练对后续肥大的影响尚不明确,其生理益处仍有待确定。要点:肌肉记忆是一种细胞机制,描述了骨骼肌纤维对训练刺激做出不同反应的能力,如果这些刺激以前遇到过的话。这项研究克服了过去在肌肉选择和分析程序方面的方法限制。我们的研究表明,肌核数量在力量训练后会增加,并在非训练期间保持不变。先前训练过的肌肉中增加的肌核数量和与肌肉性能和发育相关的差异表达基因并没有转化为再训练时明显优越的反应。由于再训练对后续肥大和肌肉力量增长的影响尚不明确,因此其生理益处仍有待确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Physiology-London
Journal of Physiology-London 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physiology publishes full-length original Research Papers and Techniques for Physiology, which are short papers aimed at disseminating new techniques for physiological research. Articles solicited by the Editorial Board include Perspectives, Symposium Reports and Topical Reviews, which highlight areas of special physiological interest. CrossTalk articles are short editorial-style invited articles framing a debate between experts in the field on controversial topics. Letters to the Editor and Journal Club articles are also published. All categories of papers are subjected to peer reivew. The Journal of Physiology welcomes submitted research papers in all areas of physiology. Authors should present original work that illustrates new physiological principles or mechanisms. Papers on work at the molecular level, at the level of the cell membrane, single cells, tissues or organs and on systems physiology are all acceptable. Theoretical papers and papers that use computational models to further our understanding of physiological processes will be considered if based on experimentally derived data and if the hypothesis advanced is directly amenable to experimental testing. While emphasis is on human and mammalian physiology, work on lower vertebrate or invertebrate preparations may be suitable if it furthers the understanding of the functioning of other organisms including mammals.
期刊最新文献
Noise-induced reduction and early recovery of superior paraolivary nucleus sound-offset responses. Issue Information Can lithium fill the gap to mitigate metabolic and functional deficits following the loss of ovarian hormones? Neuroscience of the premotor cortex: Implications for motivation shaping attention-motor interactions Heart rate phase is an indicator of chronotype-relevant circadian shifts associated with human disease: an All of Us Research Program analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1