Real-world occupational therapy interventions for early-stage dementia: Characteristics and contextual barriers.

IF 2.2 Dementia (London, England) Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1177/14713012241272815
Bethan M Edwards, Monica Busse, Teena J Clouston, Ben Hannigan
{"title":"Real-world occupational therapy interventions for early-stage dementia: Characteristics and contextual barriers.","authors":"Bethan M Edwards, Monica Busse, Teena J Clouston, Ben Hannigan","doi":"10.1177/14713012241272815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AimThere is an absence of evidence generated in a UK context to support interventions based on occupational therapists' core skills for people living with early-stage dementia. To inform the development of a programme theory and a future evaluation, this paper aimed to describe real-world (routine) community-based occupational therapy interventions for this population and contextual barriers.MethodOccupational therapy practitioners (<i>n</i> = 21) from five Health Boards in Wales, UK participated in semi-structured interviews (<i>n</i> = 17) which were audio recorded, transcribed, and analysed thematically.FindingsThe availability of, and access to, real-world community-based interventions was variable, and associated with multilevel contextual barriers (resources, understanding of dementia specialist occupational therapy, professional influence, and evidence base). Where available and accessible, contents comprised a pre-intervention component (relational work, assessment, and goal setting) and intervention component (personalised problem-solving and coping strategies, emotional support, and advice and signposting), to meet needs associated with everyday activities and poor wellbeing. Variation in mode, duration, contents, and who received interventions, was associated with contextual barriers.ConclusionFindings indicate that the development of an intervention programme theory and future evaluation design, will need to account for the impact context may have on the variability of real-world intervention characteristics, and how this in turn may influence outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":72778,"journal":{"name":"Dementia (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"388-407"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11915762/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012241272815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AimThere is an absence of evidence generated in a UK context to support interventions based on occupational therapists' core skills for people living with early-stage dementia. To inform the development of a programme theory and a future evaluation, this paper aimed to describe real-world (routine) community-based occupational therapy interventions for this population and contextual barriers.MethodOccupational therapy practitioners (n = 21) from five Health Boards in Wales, UK participated in semi-structured interviews (n = 17) which were audio recorded, transcribed, and analysed thematically.FindingsThe availability of, and access to, real-world community-based interventions was variable, and associated with multilevel contextual barriers (resources, understanding of dementia specialist occupational therapy, professional influence, and evidence base). Where available and accessible, contents comprised a pre-intervention component (relational work, assessment, and goal setting) and intervention component (personalised problem-solving and coping strategies, emotional support, and advice and signposting), to meet needs associated with everyday activities and poor wellbeing. Variation in mode, duration, contents, and who received interventions, was associated with contextual barriers.ConclusionFindings indicate that the development of an intervention programme theory and future evaluation design, will need to account for the impact context may have on the variability of real-world intervention characteristics, and how this in turn may influence outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对早期痴呆症的真实世界职业疗法干预:特点和环境障碍。
目的:在英国,还没有基于职业治疗师的核心技能对早期痴呆症患者进行干预的证据。为了给计划理论的发展和未来评估提供信息,本文旨在描述针对这一人群的真实世界(常规)社区职业疗法干预措施以及背景障碍:方法:来自英国威尔士五个卫生局的职业疗法从业人员(n = 21)参加了半结构式访谈(n = 17),访谈进行了录音、转录和专题分析:调查结果:现实世界中基于社区的干预措施的可用性和可获得性各不相同,并与多层次的背景障碍(资源、对痴呆症专业职业疗法的理解、专业影响和证据基础)有关。在可利用和可获得的情况下,干预内容包括干预前部分(关系工作、评估和目标设定)和干预部分(个性化问题解决和应对策略、情感支持、建议和指路),以满足与日常活动和不良健康状况相关的需求。干预方式、持续时间、内容和接受干预者的不同与环境障碍有关:研究结果表明,干预计划理论的发展和未来的评估设计需要考虑到环境可能对现实世界干预特点的变化产生的影响,以及这反过来会如何影响结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Working With Patients Living With Dementia, Delirium and Behaviours of Concern: An Exploration into the Impact on Allied Health Staff Wellbeing. Enhancing accessibility to the dementia risk profile (DRP) and knowledge of dementia risk reduction (KoDeRR) measuring tools to diverse communities through translation and adaptation in the Nepali language. Pilot of a multicomponent program for people with dementia and their care partners: Health services staff expectations, experiences and observations. A 'personhood paradox': Care partners' experiences supporting people with dementia and incontinence. Meaning making during bereavement as part of caregiver speaks, a narrative photo-elicitation intervention for Caregivers of persons living with dementia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1