Catamaran SI Joint Fusion System(R) MAINSAILTM Study: a prospective, single-arm, multi-center, post-market study of six-month clinical outcomes and twelve-month radiographic findings.

Matthew Davies, Marcel Dreischarf, Rachelle Yusufbekov
{"title":"Catamaran SI Joint Fusion System<sup>(R)</sup> MAINSAIL<sup>TM</sup> Study: a prospective, single-arm, multi-center, post-market study of six-month clinical outcomes and twelve-month radiographic findings.","authors":"Matthew Davies, Marcel Dreischarf, Rachelle Yusufbekov","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2394168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally invasive surgical techniques for sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fixation have the potential to reduce risk and improve patient outcomes, but evidence remains limited. This interim analysis presents initial findings from an ongoing prospective study evaluating the safety and efficacy of the Catamaran System.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The primary endpoint of success at 6 months was defined as a ≥20 mm improvement in SIJ pain (Visual Analog Scale, VAS), no neurologic worsening, absence of device-related serious adverse events (SAEs), and no surgical reintervention. Secondary endpoints included 6 month evaluation of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), patient satisfaction, and 12 month radiographic CT fusion, performed by an indpendent radiologist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three consecutive patients (mean age: 58.9 years; %-females: 76%; Body Mass Index: 30.5) were treated across six U.S. clinical sites. At the primary endpoint of 6 months, 80% of patients met the criteria for success, with no device-related SAEs and no surgical reintervention reported. VAS<sub>SIJ-Pain</sub> significantly decreased from preoperative levels (mean: 80.9 mm) to 6 months postoperatively (31.1 mm; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Mean ODI scores also showed a significant improvement from preoperative values (51.9%) to 6 months postoperatively (29.6%, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Patients reported high satisfaction rates throughout all follow-ups, with 93.3% of patients being satisfied at 6 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients diagnosed with chronic SIJ pain, minimally invasive inferior-posterior delivery of the Catamaran implant was safe and effective in relieving pain and reducing disability.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of medical devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2024.2394168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive surgical techniques for sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fixation have the potential to reduce risk and improve patient outcomes, but evidence remains limited. This interim analysis presents initial findings from an ongoing prospective study evaluating the safety and efficacy of the Catamaran System.

Methods: The primary endpoint of success at 6 months was defined as a ≥20 mm improvement in SIJ pain (Visual Analog Scale, VAS), no neurologic worsening, absence of device-related serious adverse events (SAEs), and no surgical reintervention. Secondary endpoints included 6 month evaluation of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), patient satisfaction, and 12 month radiographic CT fusion, performed by an indpendent radiologist.

Results: Thirty-three consecutive patients (mean age: 58.9 years; %-females: 76%; Body Mass Index: 30.5) were treated across six U.S. clinical sites. At the primary endpoint of 6 months, 80% of patients met the criteria for success, with no device-related SAEs and no surgical reintervention reported. VASSIJ-Pain significantly decreased from preoperative levels (mean: 80.9 mm) to 6 months postoperatively (31.1 mm; p < 0.001). Mean ODI scores also showed a significant improvement from preoperative values (51.9%) to 6 months postoperatively (29.6%, p < 0.01). Patients reported high satisfaction rates throughout all follow-ups, with 93.3% of patients being satisfied at 6 months.

Conclusion: In patients diagnosed with chronic SIJ pain, minimally invasive inferior-posterior delivery of the Catamaran implant was safe and effective in relieving pain and reducing disability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卡塔马兰椎间关节融合系统 MAINSAIL 研究:一项前瞻性、单臂、多中心、上市后 6 个月临床疗效和 12 个月影像学检查结果的研究。
背景:骶髂关节(SIJ)固定的微创手术技术具有降低风险和改善患者预后的潜力,但证据仍然有限。本中期分析报告介绍了一项正在进行的前瞻性研究的初步结果,该研究评估了 Catamaran 系统的安全性和有效性:6个月成功的主要终点定义为SI关节疼痛(VASSIJ-Pain)改善≥20毫米、无神经系统恶化、无设备相关严重不良事件(SAE)、无手术再干预。次要终点包括奥斯韦特里残疾指数(Oswestry Disability Index,ODI)评估和患者满意度:33 名连续患者(年龄:58.9 岁;女性比例:76%;体重指数:30.5)在美国六个临床基地接受了治疗。在 6 个月的主要终点,80% 的患者达到了成功标准,没有出现与设备相关的 SAE,也没有手术再干预的报告。VASSIJPain 从术前水平(平均:80.9 毫米)到术后 6 个月(31.1 毫米;P P 结论:VASSIJPain 从术前水平(平均:80.9 毫米)到术后 6 个月(31.1 毫米;P P 结论:VASSIJPain 从术前水平(平均:80.9 毫米)到术后 6 个月(31.1 毫米;P对于确诊为慢性 SIJ 疼痛的患者,微创下后方植入 SIJ 装置在缓解疼痛和减少残疾方面是安全有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Orphan and paediatric medical devices in Europe: recommendations to support their availability for on-label and off-label clinical indications. Medical device similarity analysis: a promising approach to medical device equivalence regulation. Delivery systems for transcatheter therapies of congenital heart disease. Evaluation and management of coronary artery disease in transcatheter aortic valve implantation candidates with severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease: technology and techniques. Transforming medical education: the impact of innovations in technology and medical devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1