Urate lowering therapy in patients starting hemodialysis limit gout flares occurrence: ten years retrospective study.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY BMC Nephrology Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1186/s12882-024-03712-w
Alexia Steelandt, Ambre Hittinger, Lukshe Kanagaratnam, Isabelle Kazes, Pierre Clavel, Loïs Bolko, Philippe Rieu, Jean-Hugues Salmon
{"title":"Urate lowering therapy in patients starting hemodialysis limit gout flares occurrence: ten years retrospective study.","authors":"Alexia Steelandt, Ambre Hittinger, Lukshe Kanagaratnam, Isabelle Kazes, Pierre Clavel, Loïs Bolko, Philippe Rieu, Jean-Hugues Salmon","doi":"10.1186/s12882-024-03712-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Uncontrolled gout can cause articular impairment but is also associated with a global and cardiovascular excess mortality, especially in dialysis population. Data documented within existing research is not conclusive regarding gout flares evolution during hemodialysis and their control by urate lowering therapy (ULT). Without clear guidelines concerning hemodialysis patients management with chronic gout, this study proposes to investigate whether gout flare incidence reduction could be observed on this population treated by urate lowering therapy versus patients without treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study in two hemodialysis centers in France. Were selected patients over 18 years old with a gout history who started hemodialysis between January 2005 and September 2015. Demographics and clinicals data were recorded at hemodialysis start and throughout 5 years of follow up. Gout flare was defined as presence of uric acid crystal in joint punction or clinically diagnosed as such with a colchicine prescription. All statistical analysis were performed in SAS® version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred eighty-one patients have been included, mean age at dialysis initiation was 68.6 years (± 12.4) with 72% of men, 54% were treated by ULT: 89.7% by allopurinol and 9.3% by febuxostat. One patient received both treatments successively. After hemodialysis initiation, 35.36% patients had experienced at least one gout flare. The appearance of at least one gout flare concerned 50% of patients in no ULT group and 22.68% patients in ULT group (p = 0.0002). Dialysis efficiency was measured at regular interval during follow-up and was similar in both groups. To study the association strength between clinical factors and gout flares occurrences, a Cox model was performed; ULT is a protector factor of gout flare (HR:0,42, CI 95: 0,25-0,71). The proportion of serum urate values within the target (median 53% vs 29.3%, p < 0.0001) was significantly higher in ULT group versus no ULT group (median 53% vs 29.3%, p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Urate lowering therapy limit new gout flares occurrence in hemodialysis patients with gout historyCollaboration between rheumatologists and nephrologists may help to update guidelines for urate-lowering therapies in patients on dialysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9089,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nephrology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11334598/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-024-03712-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Uncontrolled gout can cause articular impairment but is also associated with a global and cardiovascular excess mortality, especially in dialysis population. Data documented within existing research is not conclusive regarding gout flares evolution during hemodialysis and their control by urate lowering therapy (ULT). Without clear guidelines concerning hemodialysis patients management with chronic gout, this study proposes to investigate whether gout flare incidence reduction could be observed on this population treated by urate lowering therapy versus patients without treatment.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study in two hemodialysis centers in France. Were selected patients over 18 years old with a gout history who started hemodialysis between January 2005 and September 2015. Demographics and clinicals data were recorded at hemodialysis start and throughout 5 years of follow up. Gout flare was defined as presence of uric acid crystal in joint punction or clinically diagnosed as such with a colchicine prescription. All statistical analysis were performed in SAS® version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).

Results: One hundred eighty-one patients have been included, mean age at dialysis initiation was 68.6 years (± 12.4) with 72% of men, 54% were treated by ULT: 89.7% by allopurinol and 9.3% by febuxostat. One patient received both treatments successively. After hemodialysis initiation, 35.36% patients had experienced at least one gout flare. The appearance of at least one gout flare concerned 50% of patients in no ULT group and 22.68% patients in ULT group (p = 0.0002). Dialysis efficiency was measured at regular interval during follow-up and was similar in both groups. To study the association strength between clinical factors and gout flares occurrences, a Cox model was performed; ULT is a protector factor of gout flare (HR:0,42, CI 95: 0,25-0,71). The proportion of serum urate values within the target (median 53% vs 29.3%, p < 0.0001) was significantly higher in ULT group versus no ULT group (median 53% vs 29.3%, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Urate lowering therapy limit new gout flares occurrence in hemodialysis patients with gout historyCollaboration between rheumatologists and nephrologists may help to update guidelines for urate-lowering therapies in patients on dialysis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对开始血液透析的患者进行尿酸盐降低治疗可限制痛风复发:十年回顾性研究。
背景:未得到控制的痛风可导致关节损伤,同时还与全球和心血管疾病的高死亡率有关,尤其是在透析人群中。关于血液透析期间痛风发作的演变以及通过降尿酸治疗(ULT)控制痛风发作的问题,现有研究中的数据尚无定论。由于没有关于血液透析患者慢性痛风治疗的明确指南,本研究拟调查在这一人群中,接受降尿酸治疗的患者与未接受治疗的患者相比,痛风发作的发生率是否会降低:我们在法国的两家血液透析中心进行了一项回顾性队列研究。研究选取了 2005 年 1 月至 2015 年 9 月期间开始血液透析的 18 岁以上有痛风病史的患者。研究人员记录了开始血液透析时和随访 5 年期间的人口统计学和临床数据。痛风发作的定义是关节穿刺处出现尿酸结晶,或临床诊断为痛风并开具秋水仙碱处方。所有统计分析均在 SAS® 9.4 版(SAS Institute Inc:结果:共纳入了 181 名患者,开始透析时的平均年龄为 68.6 岁(± 12.4),其中 72% 为男性,54% 的患者接受了超滤治疗:89.7% 的患者接受了别嘌醇治疗,9.3% 的患者接受了非布索坦治疗。一名患者先后接受了两种治疗。开始血液透析后,35.36% 的患者至少经历过一次痛风发作。未接受超量透析治疗组 50%的患者和超量透析治疗组 22.68% 的患者至少出现过一次痛风发作(P = 0.0002)。随访期间定期测量透析效率,两组的透析效率相似。为了研究临床因素与痛风复发之间的关联强度,采用了 Cox 模型;ULT 是痛风复发的保护因素(HR:0,42, CI 95: 0,25-0,71)。血清尿酸值在目标值范围内的比例(中位数为 53% vs 29.3%,P 结语)为 0.5%:风湿病学家和肾病学家之间的合作有助于更新透析患者的降尿酸治疗指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nephrology
BMC Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
375
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nephrology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of kidney and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Centre-level fluid management practices in the BISTRO trial and their lack of association with participant fluid status and blood pressure in non-anuric haemodialysis patients. Impact of COVID-19 on nephropathy in diabetes mellitus type-II patients: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Association between different proportions of crescents and the progression of IgA nephropathy (IgAN): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Decoy cells detected in the urine of a patient with complex karyotype Myelodysplastic neoplasms who underwent umbilical cord blood transplantation: a case report. Internal hernia following laparoendoscopic single site surgery: a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1