The microbiota comparative analysis of the characteristics between colorectal adenomatous polyps and normal mucosal intestinal.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1097/MEG.0000000000002836
Ya Liu, Xiao-Xiao Lin, Si-Si Hu, En-Dian Zheng, Yi Ye, Bei-Bei Xu, Le-Can Wu
{"title":"The microbiota comparative analysis of the characteristics between colorectal adenomatous polyps and normal mucosal intestinal.","authors":"Ya Liu, Xiao-Xiao Lin, Si-Si Hu, En-Dian Zheng, Yi Ye, Bei-Bei Xu, Le-Can Wu","doi":"10.1097/MEG.0000000000002836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to systematically examine and compare the characteristics distinguishing colorectal adenomatous polyps from normal mucosal intestinal microbiota.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 30 specimens were obtained from patients diagnosed with colorectal adenomatous polyps (adenoma group) who underwent endoscopic removal at Wenzhou People's Hospital between September 2021 and November 2021. Concurrently, 30 normal mucosal specimens were collected from patients without adenomatous polyps (control group). Subsequently, microbiome total DNA extraction was carried out, followed by PCR amplification targeting the V3-V4 region of the 16S rDNA. High-throughput sequencing was conducted using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Subsequent to sequencing, bioinformatics analysis was used to assess the diversity, composition, and functional aspects of the intestinal microbiota in both study groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A notable dissimilarity in the microbiota structure was identified, specifically within the transverse colon, between these two groups (P < 0.05). Species composition analysis revealed that Escherichia, Fusobacterium, and Bacteroides were predominant bacteria in both groups, with Escherichia and Enterobacter displaying significant differences at the genera level between the control group and the adenoma group (P < 0.05). Correlation analysis and functional prediction demonstrated substantial disparities in interactions among dominant intestinal microbial genera within patients from both groups. Additionally, it was discovered that the intestinal microbiomes in patients in the adenoma group exhibited a significantly higher pathogenic potential.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Upon conducting a comprehensive analysis, it was discerned that the microbiota present in the transverse colon of the control group exhibited distinctive characteristics that may contribute to the maintenance of intestinal health.</p>","PeriodicalId":11999,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000002836","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to systematically examine and compare the characteristics distinguishing colorectal adenomatous polyps from normal mucosal intestinal microbiota.

Methods: A total of 30 specimens were obtained from patients diagnosed with colorectal adenomatous polyps (adenoma group) who underwent endoscopic removal at Wenzhou People's Hospital between September 2021 and November 2021. Concurrently, 30 normal mucosal specimens were collected from patients without adenomatous polyps (control group). Subsequently, microbiome total DNA extraction was carried out, followed by PCR amplification targeting the V3-V4 region of the 16S rDNA. High-throughput sequencing was conducted using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Subsequent to sequencing, bioinformatics analysis was used to assess the diversity, composition, and functional aspects of the intestinal microbiota in both study groups.

Results: A notable dissimilarity in the microbiota structure was identified, specifically within the transverse colon, between these two groups (P < 0.05). Species composition analysis revealed that Escherichia, Fusobacterium, and Bacteroides were predominant bacteria in both groups, with Escherichia and Enterobacter displaying significant differences at the genera level between the control group and the adenoma group (P < 0.05). Correlation analysis and functional prediction demonstrated substantial disparities in interactions among dominant intestinal microbial genera within patients from both groups. Additionally, it was discovered that the intestinal microbiomes in patients in the adenoma group exhibited a significantly higher pathogenic potential.

Conclusion: Upon conducting a comprehensive analysis, it was discerned that the microbiota present in the transverse colon of the control group exhibited distinctive characteristics that may contribute to the maintenance of intestinal health.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大肠腺瘤性息肉与正常肠粘膜特征的微生物群比较分析。
研究目的本研究旨在系统研究和比较结直肠腺瘤性息肉与正常黏膜肠道微生物区系的区别特征:方法:选取 2021 年 9 月至 2021 年 11 月期间在温州市人民医院接受内镜下切除术的大肠腺瘤性息肉患者(腺瘤组)共 30 例标本。同时,从无腺瘤性息肉的患者(对照组)中采集了30份正常粘膜标本。随后进行微生物组总 DNA 提取,并针对 16S rDNA 的 V3-V4 区域进行 PCR 扩增。使用 Illumina MiSeq 平台进行了高通量测序。测序后,利用生物信息学分析评估了两个研究组的肠道微生物群的多样性、组成和功能:结果:发现这两个研究组的微生物群结构存在明显差异,特别是在横结肠内(P 结论):经过综合分析,发现对照组横结肠中的微生物群具有独特的特征,可能有助于维持肠道健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
269
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology publishes papers reporting original clinical and scientific research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes three types of manuscript: in-depth reviews (by invitation only), full papers and case reports. Manuscripts submitted to the journal will be accepted on the understanding that the author has not previously submitted the paper to another journal or had the material published elsewhere. Authors are asked to disclose any affiliations, including financial, consultant, or institutional associations, that might lead to bias or a conflict of interest.
期刊最新文献
Development and validation of a nomogram for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Western Xinjiang, China. Real-life experiences of switching from intravenous to subcutaneous vedolizumab maintenance therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Assessment of the clinical value of five noninvasive predictors of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease in Han Chinese adults. Characteristics analysis of hepatitis B core-related antigen in children with hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic viral hepatitis B infection. Compared with other methods, cyanoacrylate and lauromacrogol in treating esophagogastric varices did not increase the risk of postoperative infection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1