Design modification and selection of improved stem design of the conical stem tibial implant for TAR using FE analysis and different MCDM methods.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1177/09544119241272839
Jyoti, Rajesh Ghosh
{"title":"Design modification and selection of improved stem design of the conical stem tibial implant for TAR using FE analysis and different MCDM methods.","authors":"Jyoti, Rajesh Ghosh","doi":"10.1177/09544119241272839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The conical stem tibial design of total ankle replacement (TAR) has high implant-bone micromotion. This may lead to aseptic loosening which can be avoided by improving the tibial design. The objective was to propose the best stem design parameters to reduce implant-bone micromotion along with minimizing stress shielding using an integrated Finite Element-Multi Criteria Decision Making (FE-MCDM) approach. FE models of implanted tibia bones were prepared by changing the height of the stem, the diameter of the stem, and the slant of the stem. Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS), Technique for Order of Preference by Similarities to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS), and VIseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) MCDM techniques with equal weights for micromotion and stress shielding were considered. The micromotion and stress shielding were greater when the height of the stem was increased. Whereas, the increase in diameter and slant affected them marginally. The best-performing design was the Model with stem height 6 mm (diameter 6.4 mm and slant 4°) and after that was the Model with stem height 8 mm (diameter 6.4 mm and slant 4°), and then the Model with stem height 10 mm (diameter 6.4 mm and slant 4°). The height of the stem is the most important stem design parameter. Shorter height, moderate thickness, and moderate slanting stem designs are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":20666,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"874-885"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09544119241272839","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The conical stem tibial design of total ankle replacement (TAR) has high implant-bone micromotion. This may lead to aseptic loosening which can be avoided by improving the tibial design. The objective was to propose the best stem design parameters to reduce implant-bone micromotion along with minimizing stress shielding using an integrated Finite Element-Multi Criteria Decision Making (FE-MCDM) approach. FE models of implanted tibia bones were prepared by changing the height of the stem, the diameter of the stem, and the slant of the stem. Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS), Technique for Order of Preference by Similarities to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS), and VIseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) MCDM techniques with equal weights for micromotion and stress shielding were considered. The micromotion and stress shielding were greater when the height of the stem was increased. Whereas, the increase in diameter and slant affected them marginally. The best-performing design was the Model with stem height 6 mm (diameter 6.4 mm and slant 4°) and after that was the Model with stem height 8 mm (diameter 6.4 mm and slant 4°), and then the Model with stem height 10 mm (diameter 6.4 mm and slant 4°). The height of the stem is the most important stem design parameter. Shorter height, moderate thickness, and moderate slanting stem designs are recommended.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用有限元分析和不同的 MCDM 方法,对用于 TAR 的锥形柄胫骨植入物进行设计修改并选择改进的柄设计。
全踝关节置换术(TAR)的锥形柄胫骨设计具有较高的植入物-骨微动。这可能导致无菌性松动,而改进胫骨设计可以避免这种情况。我们的目标是采用有限元-多标准决策(FE-MCDM)综合方法,提出最佳的茎干设计参数,以减少植入物与骨之间的微动,同时最大限度地减少应力屏蔽。通过改变骨干高度、骨干直径和骨干斜度,制备了植入胫骨的有限元模型。研究考虑了加权汇总乘积评估(WASPAS)、与理想方案相似度排序技术(TOPSIS)、基于平均方案距离的评估(EDAS)以及微动和应力屏蔽权重相等的 VIseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje(VIKOR)MCDM 技术。当茎杆高度增加时,微动和应力屏蔽的影响更大。而直径和斜度的增加对它们的影响很小。茎杆高度为 6 毫米(直径为 6.4 毫米,斜度为 4°)的模型是性能最好的设计,其次是茎杆高度为 8 毫米(直径为 6.4 毫米,斜度为 4°)的模型,然后是茎杆高度为 10 毫米(直径为 6.4 毫米,斜度为 4°)的模型。茎杆高度是最重要的茎杆设计参数。建议采用高度较短、厚度适中、倾斜度适中的阀杆设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
122
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Engineering in Medicine is an interdisciplinary journal encompassing all aspects of engineering in medicine. The Journal is a vital tool for maintaining an understanding of the newest techniques and research in medical engineering.
期刊最新文献
Effects of self-expandable pedicle screws with shape memory alloy structures on spinal fixation strength: A finite element study. A systematic review of energy storing dynamic response foot for prosthetic rehabilitation. Cortical bone fracture analysis including the combined influence of osteon orientations, applied load and crack lengths: A numerical investigation. A wavelet and local binary pattern-based feature descriptor for the detection of chronic infection through thoracic X-ray images. Optimization and control of robotic vertebral plate grinding: Predictive modeling, parameter optimization, and fuzzy control strategies for minimizing bone damage in laminectomy procedures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1