Hospital commitments to address diagnostic errors: An assessment of 95 US hospitals

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of hospital medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1002/jhm.13485
Alexandra Campione Russo MPH, Jean-Luc Tilly MPA, PMP, Leah Kaufman BA, Melissa Danforth BA, Mark L. Graber MD, FACP, J. Matthew Austin PhD, Hardeep Singh MD, MPH
{"title":"Hospital commitments to address diagnostic errors: An assessment of 95 US hospitals","authors":"Alexandra Campione Russo MPH,&nbsp;Jean-Luc Tilly MPA, PMP,&nbsp;Leah Kaufman BA,&nbsp;Melissa Danforth BA,&nbsp;Mark L. Graber MD, FACP,&nbsp;J. Matthew Austin PhD,&nbsp;Hardeep Singh MD, MPH","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Diagnostic errors are a leading cause of patient harm. In 2022, the Leapfrog Group published a report containing 29 evidence-based practices that hospitals can adopt to reduce diagnostic errors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To understand the extent to which US hospitals have already implemented these practices, we conducted a national pilot survey of Leapfrog-participating hospitals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>To reduce respondent burden, we divided the 29 practices across two surveys: one focused on organizational culture and structure (Domain 1), and the second focused on the diagnostic process itself (Domain 2).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 95 hospitals from 23 states responded to one or both surveys. On average, hospitals reported implementing 9 of the 16 practices (56%) in Domain 1 and 8 of the 13 practices (62%) in Domain 2. The rate of practice implementation varied greatly, with some hospitals implementing as few as three practices in their domain. The most commonly implemented practices were ensuring access to medical interpreters, continuous access to radiologists, ensuring staff and patients can report diagnostic errors and concerns, and having a formal process to identify and notify patients when diagnostic errors occur. The least implemented practices included convening a multidisciplinary team focused on diagnostic safety and quality, a CEO commitment to diagnostic excellence, conducting diagnosis-focused risk assessments, and training clinicians to optimize clinical reasoning in the diagnostic process.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The findings suggest large and important implementation gaps for practices related to diagnostic excellence and can inform new initiatives to promote diagnostic excellence in US hospitals.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":"20 2","pages":"120-134"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jhm.13485","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhm.13485","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Diagnostic errors are a leading cause of patient harm. In 2022, the Leapfrog Group published a report containing 29 evidence-based practices that hospitals can adopt to reduce diagnostic errors.

Objectives

To understand the extent to which US hospitals have already implemented these practices, we conducted a national pilot survey of Leapfrog-participating hospitals.

Methods

To reduce respondent burden, we divided the 29 practices across two surveys: one focused on organizational culture and structure (Domain 1), and the second focused on the diagnostic process itself (Domain 2).

Results

A total of 95 hospitals from 23 states responded to one or both surveys. On average, hospitals reported implementing 9 of the 16 practices (56%) in Domain 1 and 8 of the 13 practices (62%) in Domain 2. The rate of practice implementation varied greatly, with some hospitals implementing as few as three practices in their domain. The most commonly implemented practices were ensuring access to medical interpreters, continuous access to radiologists, ensuring staff and patients can report diagnostic errors and concerns, and having a formal process to identify and notify patients when diagnostic errors occur. The least implemented practices included convening a multidisciplinary team focused on diagnostic safety and quality, a CEO commitment to diagnostic excellence, conducting diagnosis-focused risk assessments, and training clinicians to optimize clinical reasoning in the diagnostic process.

Conclusions

The findings suggest large and important implementation gaps for practices related to diagnostic excellence and can inform new initiatives to promote diagnostic excellence in US hospitals.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医院解决诊断错误的承诺:对 95 家美国医院的评估。
背景:诊断错误是造成患者伤害的主要原因。2022 年,Leapfrog 集团发布了一份报告,其中包含 29 项循证实践,医院可以采用这些实践来减少诊断错误:为了了解美国医院在多大程度上已经实施了这些措施,我们对参与 Leapfrog 的医院进行了一次全国性试点调查:为了减轻受访者的负担,我们将 29 项实践分为两项调查:一项侧重于组织文化和结构(领域 1),另一项侧重于诊断流程本身(领域 2):共有来自 23 个州的 95 家医院回答了其中一项或两项调查。平均而言,医院报告在领域 1 的 16 项实践中实施了 9 项(56%),在领域 2 的 13 项实践中实施了 8 项(62%)。实践实施率差异很大,有些医院在其领域中仅实施了 3 项实践。最常实施的做法是确保能够获得医疗翻译、持续获得放射科医生的服务、确保员工和患者能够报告诊断错误和疑虑,以及在诊断错误发生时有一个正式的流程来识别和通知患者。实施最少的做法包括召集多学科团队关注诊断安全和质量、首席执行官对卓越诊断的承诺、开展以诊断为重点的风险评估以及培训临床医生优化诊断过程中的临床推理:研究结果表明,在实施与卓越诊断相关的实践方面存在巨大且重要的差距,可为美国医院促进卓越诊断的新举措提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of hospital medicine
Journal of hospital medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
11.50%
发文量
233
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JHM is a peer-reviewed publication of the Society of Hospital Medicine and is published 12 times per year. JHM publishes manuscripts that address the care of hospitalized adults or children. Broad areas of interest include (1) Treatments for common inpatient conditions; (2) Approaches to improving perioperative care; (3) Improving care for hospitalized patients with geriatric or pediatric vulnerabilities (such as mobility problems, or those with complex longitudinal care); (4) Evaluation of innovative healthcare delivery or educational models; (5) Approaches to improving the quality, safety, and value of healthcare across the acute- and postacute-continuum of care; and (6) Evaluation of policy and payment changes that affect hospital and postacute care.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Issue Information The Journal of Hospital Medicine turns 20 On healing and humanity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1