Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Effect of graft tunnel position on early to mid-term clinical outcomes.

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS World Journal of Orthopedics Pub Date : 2024-08-18 DOI:10.5312/wjo.v15.i8.744
Oliver Mann, Oday Al-Dadah
{"title":"Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Effect of graft tunnel position on early to mid-term clinical outcomes.","authors":"Oliver Mann, Oday Al-Dadah","doi":"10.5312/wjo.v15.i8.744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) can be used to assess knee function following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Intra-operatively, femoral and tibial tunnels are created to accommodate the new ACL graft. It is postulated that there is an optimum position and orientation of these tunnels and that outcomes from this procedure are affected by their position.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the influence of graft tunnel position on early to mid-term clinical outcomes following ACL reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six PROMs were collected following ACL reconstruction which included the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee, Lysholm, Tegner, EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 level, and Short Form 12-item Health Survey. A total of 8 radiological parameters were measured from post-operative X-rays relating to graft tunnel positions. This data was analysed to assess for any correlations between graft tunnel position and post-operative PROMs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 87 patients were included in the study with a mean post-operative follow-up of 2.3 years (range 1 to 7 years). Posterior position of tibial tunnel was associated with improved KOOS quality of life (rho = 0.43, <i>P</i> = 0.002) and EQ-5D VAS (rho = 0.36, <i>P</i> = 0.010). Anterior position of EndoButton femoral tunnel was associated with an improved EQ-5D index (rho = -0.38, <i>P</i> = 0.028). There were no other significant correlations between any of the other radiological parameters and PROM scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, graft tunnel position had very little correlation with clinical outcomes following ACL reconstruction. A few (posterior) tibial tunnel and (anterior) EndoButton femoral tunnel measurements were associated with better PROMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47843,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Orthopedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11331329/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v15.i8.744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) can be used to assess knee function following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Intra-operatively, femoral and tibial tunnels are created to accommodate the new ACL graft. It is postulated that there is an optimum position and orientation of these tunnels and that outcomes from this procedure are affected by their position.

Aim: To evaluate the influence of graft tunnel position on early to mid-term clinical outcomes following ACL reconstruction.

Methods: Six PROMs were collected following ACL reconstruction which included the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee, Lysholm, Tegner, EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 level, and Short Form 12-item Health Survey. A total of 8 radiological parameters were measured from post-operative X-rays relating to graft tunnel positions. This data was analysed to assess for any correlations between graft tunnel position and post-operative PROMs.

Results: A total of 87 patients were included in the study with a mean post-operative follow-up of 2.3 years (range 1 to 7 years). Posterior position of tibial tunnel was associated with improved KOOS quality of life (rho = 0.43, P = 0.002) and EQ-5D VAS (rho = 0.36, P = 0.010). Anterior position of EndoButton femoral tunnel was associated with an improved EQ-5D index (rho = -0.38, P = 0.028). There were no other significant correlations between any of the other radiological parameters and PROM scores.

Conclusion: Overall, graft tunnel position had very little correlation with clinical outcomes following ACL reconstruction. A few (posterior) tibial tunnel and (anterior) EndoButton femoral tunnel measurements were associated with better PROMs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前十字韧带重建术:移植物隧道位置对早中期临床效果的影响。
背景:患者报告结果指标(PROM)可用于评估前交叉韧带(ACL)重建术后的膝关节功能。术中需要创建股骨和胫骨隧道,以容纳新的前交叉韧带移植物。目的:评估前交叉韧带重建术后移植物隧道位置对早期和中期临床疗效的影响:方法:收集前交叉韧带重建术后的六项PROM,包括膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)、国际膝关节文献委员会、Lysholm、Tegner、EuroQol-5 Dimension-5水平和12项健康调查短表。术后 X 光片共测量了 8 项与移植物隧道位置相关的放射学参数。我们对这些数据进行了分析,以评估移植物隧道位置与术后 PROMs 之间的相关性:共有 87 名患者参与了研究,术后平均随访 2.3 年(1 至 7 年不等)。胫骨隧道后方位置与 KOOS 生活质量(rho = 0.43,P = 0.002)和 EQ-5D VAS(rho = 0.36,P = 0.010)的改善相关。EndoButton 股骨隧道的前方位置与 EQ-5D 指数的改善相关(rho = -0.38,P = 0.028)。其他任何放射学参数与 PROM 评分之间均无明显相关性:总的来说,移植物隧道的位置与前交叉韧带重建后的临床效果关系不大。少数(后方)胫骨隧道和(前方)EndoButton股骨隧道的测量与较好的PROM有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
814
期刊最新文献
Application prospects of urine-derived stem cells in neurological and musculoskeletal diseases. Atypical cervical spondylotic radiculopathy resulting in a hypertensive emergency during cervical extension: A case report and review of literature. Clinical implications of reconsideration of enthesitis/enthesopathy/enthesial erosion, as tendon attachment-localized avulsions and stress fracture equivalents. Conversion hip arthroplasty for failed nailing of intertrochanteric fracture: Reflections on some important aspects. Evidence-based orthobiologic practice: Current evidence review and future directions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1