Integrating Erosion Models Into Land Health Assessments to Better Understand Landscape Condition

IF 2.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Rangeland Ecology & Management Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1016/j.rama.2024.05.003
{"title":"Integrating Erosion Models Into Land Health Assessments to Better Understand Landscape Condition","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.rama.2024.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Wind and water erosion can severely impact natural resources and ecosystem services, making soil erosion management essential to sustaining agroecosystems. Land health assessment protocols, such as Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health (IIRH), provide valuable information to make decisions on managing soil erosion in vulnerable drylands. Using quantitative erosion models with land health assessments can further inform management decisions. For example, sediment transport estimates from the Aeolian EROsion (AERO) model and Rangeland Hydrology and Erosion Model (RHEM) can help in understanding the impacts of differences in soil and vegetation on wind and water erosion risk. In this article, we provide a conceptual basis for using AERO and RHEM to support IIRH assessments that are used extensively by managers across United States rangelands. We describe how using erosion models with IIRH can (1) improve understanding about potential erosion rates for different types of storm events; (2) support identifying areas at risk of erosion where erosion evidence is not (yet) significant; (3) increase land health assessment consistency by providing reproducible erosion indicators; (4) provide another line of evidence to support assessment conclusions about land health; and (5) improve understanding about potential erosion rates across ecologically similar sites and over time. Effectively using erosion models to support land health assessments will improve wind and water erosion management in drylands, thus helping to protect and restore these ecosystems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49634,"journal":{"name":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550742424000769/pdfft?md5=103841e6a5761f1bede2936b3991369f&pid=1-s2.0-S1550742424000769-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550742424000769","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wind and water erosion can severely impact natural resources and ecosystem services, making soil erosion management essential to sustaining agroecosystems. Land health assessment protocols, such as Interpreting Indicators of Rangeland Health (IIRH), provide valuable information to make decisions on managing soil erosion in vulnerable drylands. Using quantitative erosion models with land health assessments can further inform management decisions. For example, sediment transport estimates from the Aeolian EROsion (AERO) model and Rangeland Hydrology and Erosion Model (RHEM) can help in understanding the impacts of differences in soil and vegetation on wind and water erosion risk. In this article, we provide a conceptual basis for using AERO and RHEM to support IIRH assessments that are used extensively by managers across United States rangelands. We describe how using erosion models with IIRH can (1) improve understanding about potential erosion rates for different types of storm events; (2) support identifying areas at risk of erosion where erosion evidence is not (yet) significant; (3) increase land health assessment consistency by providing reproducible erosion indicators; (4) provide another line of evidence to support assessment conclusions about land health; and (5) improve understanding about potential erosion rates across ecologically similar sites and over time. Effectively using erosion models to support land health assessments will improve wind and water erosion management in drylands, thus helping to protect and restore these ecosystems.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将侵蚀模型纳入土地健康评估,更好地了解景观状况
风蚀和水蚀会严重影响自然资源和生态系统服务,因此土壤侵蚀管理对于维持农业生态系统至关重要。土地健康评估规程(如《牧场健康指标解读》(IIRH))可提供宝贵的信息,为管理脆弱旱地的土壤侵蚀提供决策依据。将定量侵蚀模型与土地健康评估结合使用,可为管理决策提供更多信息。例如,通过风蚀模型 (AERO) 和牧场水文与侵蚀模型 (RHEM) 估算的沉积物迁移量有助于了解土壤和植被差异对风和水侵蚀风险的影响。在这篇文章中,我们提供了使用 AERO 和 RHEM 支持 IIRH 评估的概念基础,美国牧场的管理人员广泛使用这些评估。我们介绍了将侵蚀模型与 IIRH 结合使用如何 (1) 提高对不同类型风暴事件潜在侵蚀率的认识;(2) 支持识别侵蚀证据(尚)不显著的侵蚀风险区域;(3) 通过提供可重复的侵蚀指标提高土地健康评估的一致性;(4) 提供另一种证据来支持有关土地健康的评估结论;(5) 提高对不同生态相似地点和不同时期潜在侵蚀率的认识。有效利用侵蚀模型支持土地健康评估将改善干旱地区的风蚀和水蚀管理,从而有助于保护和恢复这些生态系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rangeland Ecology & Management
Rangeland Ecology & Management 农林科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Rangeland Ecology & Management publishes all topics-including ecology, management, socioeconomic and policy-pertaining to global rangelands. The journal''s mission is to inform academics, ecosystem managers and policy makers of science-based information to promote sound rangeland stewardship. Author submissions are published in five manuscript categories: original research papers, high-profile forum topics, concept syntheses, as well as research and technical notes. Rangelands represent approximately 50% of the Earth''s land area and provision multiple ecosystem services for large human populations. This expansive and diverse land area functions as coupled human-ecological systems. Knowledge of both social and biophysical system components and their interactions represent the foundation for informed rangeland stewardship. Rangeland Ecology & Management uniquely integrates information from multiple system components to address current and pending challenges confronting global rangelands.
期刊最新文献
Ecological Stoichiometry of Multiple Nutrients in Leymus chinensis and Soils Subjected to Long-Term Saline-Sodic Stress in Western Jilin Province, China No Field Evidence of Grass Fuel Structure effects on Postfire Tree Mortality in Juniperus virginiana Table of Contents Editorial Board/Journal Info Climate Change Vulnerabilities and Adaptation Strategies for Land Managers on Northwest US Rangelands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1