Drug provocation tests (DPTs) of contrast media: Useful or not useful? – A narrative review

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY World Allergy Organization Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1016/j.waojou.2024.100946
Manuel Dettwiler MMed , Ingrid B. Boehm MD
{"title":"Drug provocation tests (DPTs) of contrast media: Useful or not useful? – A narrative review","authors":"Manuel Dettwiler MMed ,&nbsp;Ingrid B. Boehm MD","doi":"10.1016/j.waojou.2024.100946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Drug provocation tests (DPTs) are also used in some patients with a history of a contrast medium (CM)-hypersensitivity reaction. Since the use of contrast agents requires special knowledge that is present in radiology but not necessarily in allergology, this overview should close the knowledge gaps. The literature, and the package inserts of the industry dealing with DPTs in contrast hypersensitivity reactions was analyzed and the results presented. Historical analyses revealed that provocation tests were already done in the past, and called pre-testing. Due to disadvantages, this diagnostic tool was abandoned. A few years later, DPT was introduced as an innovative diagnostic procedure. The DPT has the 3 main disadvantages: a missing standardization, patients at risk (such as compromised renal function) are rarely taken into account, and a negative DPT does not exclude a subsequent CM reaction. DPTs (formerly called pre-testing) are a well-known method for diagnosing CM-related hypersensitivity reactions. Since the disadvantages of this diagnosis outweigh the advantages, we propose replacing DPT with routine contrast-enhanced imaging examination in radiology.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54295,"journal":{"name":"World Allergy Organization Journal","volume":"17 9","pages":"Article 100946"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939455124000772/pdfft?md5=dcfaceeedb9d86d93984989aac11943a&pid=1-s2.0-S1939455124000772-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Allergy Organization Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939455124000772","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drug provocation tests (DPTs) are also used in some patients with a history of a contrast medium (CM)-hypersensitivity reaction. Since the use of contrast agents requires special knowledge that is present in radiology but not necessarily in allergology, this overview should close the knowledge gaps. The literature, and the package inserts of the industry dealing with DPTs in contrast hypersensitivity reactions was analyzed and the results presented. Historical analyses revealed that provocation tests were already done in the past, and called pre-testing. Due to disadvantages, this diagnostic tool was abandoned. A few years later, DPT was introduced as an innovative diagnostic procedure. The DPT has the 3 main disadvantages: a missing standardization, patients at risk (such as compromised renal function) are rarely taken into account, and a negative DPT does not exclude a subsequent CM reaction. DPTs (formerly called pre-testing) are a well-known method for diagnosing CM-related hypersensitivity reactions. Since the disadvantages of this diagnosis outweigh the advantages, we propose replacing DPT with routine contrast-enhanced imaging examination in radiology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
造影剂药物激发试验(DPT):有用还是无用?- 叙述性综述
药物激发试验(DPT)也用于某些有造影剂过敏反应病史的患者。由于造影剂的使用需要特殊的知识,而这些知识在放射学中存在,但在过敏学中却不一定存在,因此本综述应能弥补这方面的知识空白。我们分析了有关造影剂超敏反应中 DPT 的文献和行业包装插页,并介绍了分析结果。历史分析表明,激惹试验在过去已经存在,并被称为预试验。由于其缺点,这种诊断工具被放弃了。几年后,DPT 作为一种创新的诊断程序被引入。DPT 有三大缺点:标准化缺失、高危患者(如肾功能受损者)很少被考虑在内、DPT 阴性并不能排除后续的 CM 反应。DPT(以前称为预试验)是一种众所周知的诊断中药相关超敏反应的方法。由于这种诊断方法弊大于利,我们建议用放射科常规对比增强成像检查取代 DPT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Allergy Organization Journal
World Allergy Organization Journal Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
91
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: The official pubication of the World Allergy Organization, the World Allergy Organization Journal (WAOjournal) publishes original mechanistic, translational, and clinical research on the topics of allergy, asthma, anaphylaxis, and clincial immunology, as well as reviews, guidelines, and position papers that contribute to the improvement of patient care. WAOjournal publishes research on the growth of allergy prevalence within the scope of single countries, country comparisons, and practical global issues and regulations, or threats to the allergy specialty. The Journal invites the submissions of all authors interested in publishing on current global problems in allergy, asthma, anaphylaxis, and immunology. Of particular interest are the immunological consequences of climate change and the subsequent systematic transformations in food habits and their consequences for the allergy/immunology discipline.
期刊最新文献
Allergic disease and keratoconus: A two-sample univariable and multivariable Mendelian randomization study Dissecting the pathogenic effects of smoking in blood DNA methylation on allergic diseases Longitudinal multi-trajectory phenotypes of severe eosinophilic asthma on type 2 biologics treatment Levels of total IgE versus specific IgE during childhood for defining and predicting T2-high asthma Comparing pharmacists versus allergists in low-risk penicillin allergy delabelling: The Hong Kong Penicillin Allergy Pharmacist Initiative (HK-PAPI)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1