Does dissection influence weight bias among doctor of physical therapy students?

IF 5.2 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Anatomical Sciences Education Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1002/ase.2497
Krista Rompolski, Michael A. Pascoe
{"title":"Does dissection influence weight bias among doctor of physical therapy students?","authors":"Krista Rompolski,&nbsp;Michael A. Pascoe","doi":"10.1002/ase.2497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Anatomy with human dissection may help to develop respect for the human body and professionalism; however, dissection may worsen students' attitudes about body weight and adiposity. The purpose of this study was to measure weight bias among Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students enrolled in gross anatomy and determine if, and how the experience of dissection impacts weight bias. Ninety-seven DPT students (70 University of Colorado [CU], 27 Moravian University [MU]) were invited to complete a survey during the first and final weeks of their anatomy course. The survey included demographic items, two measures of weight bias—the Modified Weight Bias Internalized Scale (M-WBIS) and the Attitudes Towards Obese Persons (ATOP) Scale—and open-ended questions for the students who participated in dissection (CU students) that explored attitudes about body weight and adiposity. At baseline, there were no significant differences (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.202) in ATOP, M-WBIS, or BMI between the two universities. The mean scores on both the ATOP and M-WBIS indicated a moderate degree of both internalized and externalized weight bias. There were no significant changes in ATOP (<i>p</i> = 0.566) or M-WBIS scores (<i>p</i> = 0.428). BMI had a low correlation with initial M-WBIS scores (<i>⍴</i> = 0.294, <i>p</i> = 0.038) and a high correlation with change scores in CU students (<i>⍴</i> = 0.530, <i>p</i> = 0.011). Future studies should utilize the same measures of weight bias in other healthcare trainees to facilitate comparison and incorporate larger populations of DPT students.</p>","PeriodicalId":124,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Sciences Education","volume":"17 7","pages":"1473-1484"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomical Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ase.2497","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anatomy with human dissection may help to develop respect for the human body and professionalism; however, dissection may worsen students' attitudes about body weight and adiposity. The purpose of this study was to measure weight bias among Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students enrolled in gross anatomy and determine if, and how the experience of dissection impacts weight bias. Ninety-seven DPT students (70 University of Colorado [CU], 27 Moravian University [MU]) were invited to complete a survey during the first and final weeks of their anatomy course. The survey included demographic items, two measures of weight bias—the Modified Weight Bias Internalized Scale (M-WBIS) and the Attitudes Towards Obese Persons (ATOP) Scale—and open-ended questions for the students who participated in dissection (CU students) that explored attitudes about body weight and adiposity. At baseline, there were no significant differences (p > 0.202) in ATOP, M-WBIS, or BMI between the two universities. The mean scores on both the ATOP and M-WBIS indicated a moderate degree of both internalized and externalized weight bias. There were no significant changes in ATOP (p = 0.566) or M-WBIS scores (p = 0.428). BMI had a low correlation with initial M-WBIS scores ( = 0.294, p = 0.038) and a high correlation with change scores in CU students ( = 0.530, p = 0.011). Future studies should utilize the same measures of weight bias in other healthcare trainees to facilitate comparison and incorporate larger populations of DPT students.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解剖是否会影响物理治疗博士学生的体重偏差?
解剖人体有助于培养对人体的尊重和专业精神;但是,解剖可能会恶化学生对体重和脂肪的态度。本研究的目的是测量修读大体解剖学的物理治疗博士(DPT)学生的体重偏差,并确定解剖经历是否以及如何影响体重偏差。97 名 DPT 学生(70 名科罗拉多大学 [CU],27 名摩拉维亚大学 [MU])应邀在解剖课程的第一周和最后一周完成了一项调查。调查内容包括人口统计学项目、两种体重偏差测量方法--修正体重偏差内化量表(M-WBIS)和对肥胖者的态度量表(ATOP)--以及针对参加解剖的学生(科大学生)的开放式问题,这些问题探讨了他们对体重和肥胖的态度。基线时,两所大学在 ATOP、M-WBIS 或 BMI 方面没有明显差异(p > 0.202)。ATOP和M-WBIS的平均分都表明,学生存在中度的内化和外化体重偏差。ATOP (p = 0.566) 或 M-WBIS 分数 (p = 0.428) 均无明显变化。体重指数与初始 M-WBIS 分数的相关性较低(⍴ = 0.294,p = 0.038),而与中大学生的变化分数的相关性较高(⍴ = 0.530,p = 0.011)。未来的研究应在其他医疗保健学员中使用相同的体重偏差测量方法,以便于比较,并纳入更多的 DPT 学生群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anatomical Sciences Education
Anatomical Sciences Education Anatomy/education-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
39.70%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Anatomical Sciences Education, affiliated with the American Association for Anatomy, serves as an international platform for sharing ideas, innovations, and research related to education in anatomical sciences. Covering gross anatomy, embryology, histology, and neurosciences, the journal addresses education at various levels, including undergraduate, graduate, post-graduate, allied health, medical (both allopathic and osteopathic), and dental. It fosters collaboration and discussion in the field of anatomical sciences education.
期刊最新文献
Teaching human anatomy before during and after COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal study on kinesiology students' performance, cognitive load, and congruent embodied learning. Refocusing graduate gross anatomy training: Curating future content experts. Anatomical Sciences Education Vol. 17, Issue 8, 2024 Cover Image Editorial Board and Table of Contents Comparing assisting technologies for proficiency in cardiac morphology: 3D printing and mixed reality versus CT slice images for morphological understanding of congenital heart defects by medical students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1