Differences in Healthcare Resource Use and Cost by Pharmacotherapy Among Patients with Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Real-World Analysis of Claims Data

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1007/s40256-024-00674-0
Michael Butzner, Eros Papademetriou, Ravi Potluri, Xing Liu, Sanatan Shreay
{"title":"Differences in Healthcare Resource Use and Cost by Pharmacotherapy Among Patients with Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Real-World Analysis of Claims Data","authors":"Michael Butzner,&nbsp;Eros Papademetriou,&nbsp;Ravi Potluri,&nbsp;Xing Liu,&nbsp;Sanatan Shreay","doi":"10.1007/s40256-024-00674-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>For symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM), limited evidence exists on healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and cost for patients with symptomatic oHCM by treatment categories. We evaluated whether HRU and costs vary by initial treatment in symptomatic oHCM.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a retrospective study of medical and pharmacy claims from 2016 to 2021 to identify (per International Classification of Disease Tenth Revision diagnosis codes) adult patients in the USA with symptomatic oHCM. Patients included in the study cohort were required to be treatment naïve (≥ 12 months’ activity before first treatment) and symptomatic (fatigue, chest pain, syncope, dyspnea, heart failure, or palpitations within 3 months of index date). Patients were grouped by first index treatment [beta blocker (BB), calcium channel blockers (CCB), disopyramide, combination therapy], and HRU and costs [per person per year (PPPY), in USD] by initial treatment were reported.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 7334 patients with symptomatic oHCM, initial treatment included BB (65.8%), CCB (21.1%), disopyramide (1.2%), or BB + CCB (11.9%). Overall, 87.2% were prescribed monotherapy. Outpatient visits were the main driver of all-cause HRU (mean 11.5 PPPY), and varied by initial treatment (BB: 11.0, CCB: 10.5, disopyramide: 7.2, combination therapy: 12.1). All-cause urgent care visits were more frequent than inpatient visits (means: 5.4 and 0.83 PPPY, respectively). All-cause incurred costs were $46,628 PPPY overall and varied by treatment (BB: $47,029, CCB: $42,124, disopyramide: $27,007, combination therapy: $54,024).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In this large, US-based cohort of patients with symptomatic oHCM, initial therapy was most commonly BB and CCB monotherapy. Costs and HRU were high for most patients, but greater for those treated initially with combination therapy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":"24 6","pages":"801 - 811"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40256-024-00674-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40256-024-00674-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

For symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM), limited evidence exists on healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and cost for patients with symptomatic oHCM by treatment categories. We evaluated whether HRU and costs vary by initial treatment in symptomatic oHCM.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of medical and pharmacy claims from 2016 to 2021 to identify (per International Classification of Disease Tenth Revision diagnosis codes) adult patients in the USA with symptomatic oHCM. Patients included in the study cohort were required to be treatment naïve (≥ 12 months’ activity before first treatment) and symptomatic (fatigue, chest pain, syncope, dyspnea, heart failure, or palpitations within 3 months of index date). Patients were grouped by first index treatment [beta blocker (BB), calcium channel blockers (CCB), disopyramide, combination therapy], and HRU and costs [per person per year (PPPY), in USD] by initial treatment were reported.

Results

Among 7334 patients with symptomatic oHCM, initial treatment included BB (65.8%), CCB (21.1%), disopyramide (1.2%), or BB + CCB (11.9%). Overall, 87.2% were prescribed monotherapy. Outpatient visits were the main driver of all-cause HRU (mean 11.5 PPPY), and varied by initial treatment (BB: 11.0, CCB: 10.5, disopyramide: 7.2, combination therapy: 12.1). All-cause urgent care visits were more frequent than inpatient visits (means: 5.4 and 0.83 PPPY, respectively). All-cause incurred costs were $46,628 PPPY overall and varied by treatment (BB: $47,029, CCB: $42,124, disopyramide: $27,007, combination therapy: $54,024).

Conclusions

In this large, US-based cohort of patients with symptomatic oHCM, initial therapy was most commonly BB and CCB monotherapy. Costs and HRU were high for most patients, but greater for those treated initially with combination therapy.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有症状的阻塞性肥厚型心肌病患者的药物治疗在医疗资源使用和成本方面的差异:索赔数据的真实世界分析。
背景:对于有症状的阻塞性肥厚型心肌病(oHCM),关于有症状的oHCM患者的医疗资源利用率(HRU)和成本(按治疗类别划分)的证据有限。我们评估了无症状 oHCM 患者的医疗资源利用率和成本是否因初始治疗而异:这是一项对 2016 年至 2021 年医疗和药学索赔的回顾性研究,目的是识别(根据国际疾病分类第十版诊断代码)美国有症状的 oHCM 成年患者。纳入研究队列的患者必须是治疗新手(首次治疗前活动时间≥ 12 个月)和有症状的患者(指数日期后 3 个月内出现疲劳、胸痛、晕厥、呼吸困难、心力衰竭或心悸)。根据首次指数治疗[β受体阻滞剂(BB)、钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)、地氯吡胺、联合疗法]对患者进行分组,并报告首次治疗的 HRU 和费用[每人每年(PPPY),单位:美元]:在 7334 名有症状的 oHCM 患者中,初始治疗包括 BB(65.8%)、CCB(21.1%)、地氯吡胺(1.2%)或 BB + CCB(11.9%)。总体而言,87.2%的患者接受了单药治疗。门诊就诊是全因 HRU 的主要驱动因素(平均 11.5 PPPY),并因初始治疗而异(BB:11.0;CCB:10.5;地氯吡胺:7.2;联合治疗:12.1)。全因急诊就诊次数多于住院就诊次数(平均值分别为 5.4 和 0.83 PPPY)。全因发生的费用总计为 46,628 美元,因治疗方法而异(BB:47,029 美元;CCB:42,124 美元;地氯吡胺:27,007 美元;联合疗法:54,024 美元):结论:在这一大型美国症状性 oHCM 患者队列中,初始治疗最常见的是 BB 和 CCB 单药治疗。大多数患者的治疗费用和 HRU 都很高,但最初接受联合治疗的患者的治疗费用和 HRU 都更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Promoting rational therapy within the discipline of cardiology, the American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs covers all aspects of the treatment of cardiovascular disorders, particularly the place in therapy of newer and established agents. Via a program of reviews and original clinical research articles, the journal addresses major issues relating to treatment of these disorders, including the pharmacology, efficacy and adverse effects of the major classes of drugs; information on newly developed drugs and drug classes; the therapeutic implications of latest research into the aetiology of cardiovascular disorders; and the practical management of specific clinical situations. The American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs offers a range of additional enhanced features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist patients, caregivers and others in understanding important medical advances. The journal also provides the option to include various other types of enhanced features including slide sets, videos and animations. All enhanced features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. Peer review is conducted using Editorial Manager®, supported by a database of international experts. This database is shared with other Adis journals.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Renal Function Estimation Formulae on Use and Correct Dosing of NOACs in Patients with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation in Real Life in Germany. Prevention of New-Onset Heart Failure in Atrial Fibrillation: The Role of Pharmacological Management. Cardiovascular Safety of Patisiran Among Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis: A Meta-analysis. Cost Effectiveness of Catheter Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drugs for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interaction between Cilostazol and Rosuvastatin in Healthy Participants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1