Polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications in older adults who use long-term care services: a cross-sectional study.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY BMC Geriatrics Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1186/s12877-024-05296-4
Shotaro Hagiwara, Jun Komiyama, Masao Iwagami, Shota Hamada, Masato Komuro, Hiroyuki Kobayashi, Nanako Tamiya
{"title":"Polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications in older adults who use long-term care services: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Shotaro Hagiwara, Jun Komiyama, Masao Iwagami, Shota Hamada, Masato Komuro, Hiroyuki Kobayashi, Nanako Tamiya","doi":"10.1186/s12877-024-05296-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older adults requiring care often have multiple morbidities that lead to polypharmacy, including the use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), leading to increased medical costs and adverse drug effects. We conducted a cross-sectional study to clarify the actual state of drug prescriptions and the background of polypharmacy and PIMs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using long-term care (LTC) and medical insurance claims data in the Ibaraki Prefecture from April 2018 to March 2019, we included individuals aged ≥ 65 who used LTC services. The number of drugs prescribed for ≥ 14 days and the number of PIMs were counted. A generalized linear model was used to analyze the association between the backgrounds of individuals and the number of drugs; logistic regression analysis was used for the presence of PIMs. PIMs were defined by STOPP-J and Beers Criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Herein, 67,531 older adults who received LTC services were included. The median number of total prescribed medications and PIMs was 7(IQR 5-9) and 1(IQR 0-1), respectively. The main PIMs were loop diuretics/aldosterone antagonists (STOPP-J), long-term use of proton pump inhibitors (Beers Criteria), benzodiazepines/similar hypnotics (STOPP-J and Beers Criteria), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (STOPP-J and Beers Criteria). Multivariate analysis revealed that the number of medications and presence of PIMs were significantly higher in patients with comorbidities and in those visiting multiple medical institutions. However, patients requiring care level ≥1, nursing home residents, users of short-stay service, and senior daycare were negatively associated with polypharmacy and PIMs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Polypharmacy and PIMs are frequently observed in older adults who require LTC. This was prominent among individuals with comorbidities and at multiple consulting institutions. Utilization of nursing care facilities may contribute to reducing polypharmacy and PIMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11337775/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05296-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Older adults requiring care often have multiple morbidities that lead to polypharmacy, including the use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), leading to increased medical costs and adverse drug effects. We conducted a cross-sectional study to clarify the actual state of drug prescriptions and the background of polypharmacy and PIMs.

Methods: Using long-term care (LTC) and medical insurance claims data in the Ibaraki Prefecture from April 2018 to March 2019, we included individuals aged ≥ 65 who used LTC services. The number of drugs prescribed for ≥ 14 days and the number of PIMs were counted. A generalized linear model was used to analyze the association between the backgrounds of individuals and the number of drugs; logistic regression analysis was used for the presence of PIMs. PIMs were defined by STOPP-J and Beers Criteria.

Results: Herein, 67,531 older adults who received LTC services were included. The median number of total prescribed medications and PIMs was 7(IQR 5-9) and 1(IQR 0-1), respectively. The main PIMs were loop diuretics/aldosterone antagonists (STOPP-J), long-term use of proton pump inhibitors (Beers Criteria), benzodiazepines/similar hypnotics (STOPP-J and Beers Criteria), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (STOPP-J and Beers Criteria). Multivariate analysis revealed that the number of medications and presence of PIMs were significantly higher in patients with comorbidities and in those visiting multiple medical institutions. However, patients requiring care level ≥1, nursing home residents, users of short-stay service, and senior daycare were negatively associated with polypharmacy and PIMs.

Conclusions: Polypharmacy and PIMs are frequently observed in older adults who require LTC. This was prominent among individuals with comorbidities and at multiple consulting institutions. Utilization of nursing care facilities may contribute to reducing polypharmacy and PIMs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用长期护理服务的老年人的多重用药和潜在用药不当情况:一项横断面研究。
背景:需要护理的老年人往往患有多种疾病,这就导致了多药治疗,包括使用可能不适当的药物(PIMs),从而导致医疗费用增加和药物不良反应。我们进行了一项横断面研究,以明确药物处方的实际情况以及多药和潜在不适当药物的背景:利用 2018 年 4 月至 2019 年 3 月期间茨城县的长期护理(LTC)和医疗保险报销数据,我们纳入了年龄≥65 岁、使用 LTC 服务的个人。统计了处方时间≥14天的药物数量和PIM数量。采用广义线性模型分析个人背景与药物数量之间的关联;采用逻辑回归分析 PIMs 的存在。PIMs根据STOPP-J和Beers标准进行定义:本文共纳入了 67531 名接受长期护理服务的老年人。处方药和PIMs总数的中位数分别为7(IQR 5-9)和1(IQR 0-1)。主要的 PIMs 包括襻利尿剂/醛固酮拮抗剂(STOPP-J)、长期使用质子泵抑制剂(Beers 标准)、苯二氮卓类/类似催眠药(STOPP-J 和 Beers 标准)以及非甾体抗炎药(STOPP-J 和 Beers 标准)。多变量分析显示,合并症患者和在多个医疗机构就诊的患者的药物数量和 PIMs 存在率明显更高。然而,需要护理级别≥1级的患者、疗养院居民、短期服务使用者和老年人日间护理与多药治疗和PIMs呈负相关:需要长期护理的老年人中经常出现多药滥用和多药滥用现象。结论:在需要接受长期护理的老年人中,经常出现多药和多药联用的现象,这在有合并症和在多个咨询机构就诊的老年人中尤为突出。使用护理机构可能有助于减少多药滥用和PIMs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
期刊最新文献
Association between healthy lifestyle and frailty in adults and mediating role of weight-adjusted waist index: results from NHANES Determinants of received care time among Finnish home care clients and assisted living facility residents: a time-motion study Effects of graphene far-infrared and social network interventions on depression, anxiety and dementia in older adults Cross-sectional association between high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and cognitive function in community-dwelling older adults: the SONIC study Creatinine-to-cystatin C ratio and frailty in older adults: a longitudinal cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1