Evaluation and comparison of autologous particulate dentin with demineralized freeze dried bone allograft in ridge preservation procedures - a prospective clinical study.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Clinical Oral Investigations Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1007/s00784-024-05861-6
Manisha Beldhi, Gautami S Penmetsa, Sruthima N V S Gottumukkala, K S V Ramesh, Mohan Kumar P, Bhavya Manchala
{"title":"Evaluation and comparison of autologous particulate dentin with demineralized freeze dried bone allograft in ridge preservation procedures - a prospective clinical study.","authors":"Manisha Beldhi, Gautami S Penmetsa, Sruthima N V S Gottumukkala, K S V Ramesh, Mohan Kumar P, Bhavya Manchala","doi":"10.1007/s00784-024-05861-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare effectiveness of Autologous Particulate Dentin (APD) with Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft (DFDBA) in ridge preservation, using radiographic and clinical parameters.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Thirty subjects with indication of mandibular posterior teeth extraction were randomly assigned to either test or control group. After atraumatic extraction, ridge preservation was performed using APD or DFDBA mixed with i-PRF in test and control groups respectively. Both groups had sockets sealed with A-PRF membrane. Clinical parameters (plaque, gingival and healing indices) and radiographic parameters (vertical ridge height, horizontal ridge width) were assessed at baseline and 6 months using CBCT. Statistical analysis was performed using an independent t-test to compare clinical and radiographic parameters between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups had significant decreases in ridge dimensions over 6 months (p < 0.001). The test group showed less reduction in ridge dimensions than control group at 6 months (p < 0.001). Mean change in vertical height was not significant (1.37 ± 1.32, 1.7311 ± 0.563), but in horizontal ridge width (1.3120 ± 1.13, 1.8093 ± 1.16) was significantly different between test and control groups respectively. There was no statistical difference in clinical parameters between the groups at 6 months (p > 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>APD grafts resulted in significant improvements in radiographic parameters, specifically in vertical ridge height and horizontal ridge width, compared to DFDBA group.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Autologous particulate dentin is a promising, versatile substitute for regenerative procedures. While more research on its long-term efficacy and application is needed, current evidence suggests it could significantly improve patient care and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05861-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare effectiveness of Autologous Particulate Dentin (APD) with Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft (DFDBA) in ridge preservation, using radiographic and clinical parameters.

Materials and methods: Thirty subjects with indication of mandibular posterior teeth extraction were randomly assigned to either test or control group. After atraumatic extraction, ridge preservation was performed using APD or DFDBA mixed with i-PRF in test and control groups respectively. Both groups had sockets sealed with A-PRF membrane. Clinical parameters (plaque, gingival and healing indices) and radiographic parameters (vertical ridge height, horizontal ridge width) were assessed at baseline and 6 months using CBCT. Statistical analysis was performed using an independent t-test to compare clinical and radiographic parameters between the groups.

Results: Both groups had significant decreases in ridge dimensions over 6 months (p < 0.001). The test group showed less reduction in ridge dimensions than control group at 6 months (p < 0.001). Mean change in vertical height was not significant (1.37 ± 1.32, 1.7311 ± 0.563), but in horizontal ridge width (1.3120 ± 1.13, 1.8093 ± 1.16) was significantly different between test and control groups respectively. There was no statistical difference in clinical parameters between the groups at 6 months (p > 0.001).

Conclusions: APD grafts resulted in significant improvements in radiographic parameters, specifically in vertical ridge height and horizontal ridge width, compared to DFDBA group.

Clinical relevance: Autologous particulate dentin is a promising, versatile substitute for regenerative procedures. While more research on its long-term efficacy and application is needed, current evidence suggests it could significantly improve patient care and outcomes.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自体颗粒牙本质与脱矿冻干骨异体移植在牙脊保存手术中的评估与比较--一项前瞻性临床研究。
目的比较自体颗粒牙本质(APD)和去矿化冻干骨异体移植(DFDBA)在牙脊保存方面的效果,并使用放射学和临床参数:将 30 名有下颌后牙拔除指征的受试者随机分配到试验组和对照组。无创拔牙后,试验组和对照组分别使用 APD 或 DFDBA 混合 i-PRF 进行牙脊保存。两组患者均使用 A-PRF 膜密封牙槽窝。在基线和 6 个月时使用 CBCT 评估临床参数(牙菌斑、牙龈和愈合指数)和放射学参数(垂直牙脊高度、水平牙脊宽度)。采用独立 t 检验进行统计分析,比较两组的临床和放射学参数:结果:两组的牙脊尺寸在 6 个月内均有明显下降(P 0.001):结论:与 DFDBA 组相比,APD 移植物可显著改善放射学参数,特别是垂直牙脊高度和水平牙脊宽度:临床意义:自体颗粒牙本质是一种很有前景的再生程序多功能替代物。虽然还需要对其长期疗效和应用进行更多的研究,但目前的证据表明,它可以显著改善患者护理和治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Investigations
Clinical Oral Investigations 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.
期刊最新文献
Effective doses of scout projections in maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography. Oral health in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A cross-sectional survey in Sweden. A retrospective comparative cephalometric evaluation of non-extraction multiloop edgewise archwire and bicuspid extraction therapies in anterior open bite treatment. Comparative assessment of the stability of buccal shelf mini-screws with and without pre-drilling- a split-mouth, randomized controlled trial. Cytotoxicity assessment of eluates from vacuum-forming thermoplastics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1