Efficacy and safety of self-expandable metallic stents for management of benign gastric outlet obstruction-A prospective study.

IF 2 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Indian Journal of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1007/s12664-024-01639-6
Alok Kumar Singh, V Krishnapriya, Sanjeev Sachdeva, Amarender S Puri, Ajay Kumar, Ujjwal Sonika, Siddharth Srivastava, Ashok Dalal
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of self-expandable metallic stents for management of benign gastric outlet obstruction-A prospective study.","authors":"Alok Kumar Singh, V Krishnapriya, Sanjeev Sachdeva, Amarender S Puri, Ajay Kumar, Ujjwal Sonika, Siddharth Srivastava, Ashok Dalal","doi":"10.1007/s12664-024-01639-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We aimed at evaluating the safety and efficacy of self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) insertion for managing patients with benign gastric outlet obstruction (GOO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective interventional study included 23 patients. All consecutive treatment-naïve symptomatic patients with benign GOO were recruited. Fully covered SEMS were deployed across the stricture under fluoroscopic and endoscopic guidance. Technical success, clinical success and sustained treatment response (STR) were assessed. Technical success was defined as the successful deployment of SEMS at the desired anatomic location. Clinical success was defined as the resolution of symptoms and an increase in Gastric Outlet Obstruction Scoring System (GOOSS) of at least 1 point from the baseline score on Day 7. STR was assessed at four and eight weeks post stent removal in patients who had a response at week four. Factors associated with stent migration and non-response at week four were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of the study population was 30 years (range 19-65 years). Males constituted 65.22%. Most patients presented with vomiting (100%) and abdominal pain (95.65%). Peptic stricture was most common etiology for GOO (60.9%) followed by tubercular (26.1%) and corrosive (13%). Most common site of obstruction was junction of first and second part of duodenum (69.57%) followed by pyloric (30.43%). Median length of stricture was 2 cm (range 1.5-4). Technical success was achieved in all 23 patients (100%). Clinical success was achieved in 21 patients (91.3%). Response at Day 28 was seen in 20 patients (86.95%). Eighteen of 20 (90%) patients who had a response at week four had STR at week four and week eight after stent removal. Stent migration occurred in five (21.7%) patients. On univariate analysis, stricture length, calibre and stent length were found to predict migration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fully covered SEMS was an effective and safe management modality in patients with benign GOO. Stent migration remains a troublesome disadvantage.</p>","PeriodicalId":13404,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-024-01639-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We aimed at evaluating the safety and efficacy of self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) insertion for managing patients with benign gastric outlet obstruction (GOO).

Methods: This prospective interventional study included 23 patients. All consecutive treatment-naïve symptomatic patients with benign GOO were recruited. Fully covered SEMS were deployed across the stricture under fluoroscopic and endoscopic guidance. Technical success, clinical success and sustained treatment response (STR) were assessed. Technical success was defined as the successful deployment of SEMS at the desired anatomic location. Clinical success was defined as the resolution of symptoms and an increase in Gastric Outlet Obstruction Scoring System (GOOSS) of at least 1 point from the baseline score on Day 7. STR was assessed at four and eight weeks post stent removal in patients who had a response at week four. Factors associated with stent migration and non-response at week four were also assessed.

Results: The median age of the study population was 30 years (range 19-65 years). Males constituted 65.22%. Most patients presented with vomiting (100%) and abdominal pain (95.65%). Peptic stricture was most common etiology for GOO (60.9%) followed by tubercular (26.1%) and corrosive (13%). Most common site of obstruction was junction of first and second part of duodenum (69.57%) followed by pyloric (30.43%). Median length of stricture was 2 cm (range 1.5-4). Technical success was achieved in all 23 patients (100%). Clinical success was achieved in 21 patients (91.3%). Response at Day 28 was seen in 20 patients (86.95%). Eighteen of 20 (90%) patients who had a response at week four had STR at week four and week eight after stent removal. Stent migration occurred in five (21.7%) patients. On univariate analysis, stricture length, calibre and stent length were found to predict migration.

Conclusions: Fully covered SEMS was an effective and safe management modality in patients with benign GOO. Stent migration remains a troublesome disadvantage.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自膨胀金属支架治疗良性胃出口梗阻的有效性和安全性--一项前瞻性研究。
简介:我们的目的是评估插入自膨胀金属支架(SEMS)治疗良性胃出口梗阻(GOO)患者的安全性和有效性:我们的目的是评估插入自膨胀金属支架(SEMS)治疗良性胃出口梗阻(GOO)患者的安全性和有效性:这项前瞻性介入研究共纳入 23 名患者。方法:这项前瞻性介入研究共纳入 23 名患者,他们都是连续接受治疗但无症状的良性胃出口梗阻患者。在透视和内窥镜引导下,将全覆盖的 SEMS 置入狭窄处。对技术成功率、临床成功率和持续治疗反应(STR)进行了评估。技术成功定义为在理想的解剖位置成功部署 SEMS。临床成功的定义是症状缓解,胃出口梗阻评分系统(GOOSS)比第 7 天的基线评分至少提高 1 分。对于在第四周有反应的患者,在支架移除后的四周和八周对 STR 进行评估。此外,还评估了与支架移位和第四周无反应相关的因素:研究对象的中位年龄为 30 岁(19-65 岁不等)。男性占 65.22%。大多数患者伴有呕吐(100%)和腹痛(95.65%)。消化道狭窄是导致胃食管返流最常见的病因(60.9%),其次是结核性(26.1%)和腐蚀性(13%)。最常见的梗阻部位是十二指肠第一段和第二段交界处(69.57%),其次是幽门(30.43%)。狭窄的中位长度为 2 厘米(1.5-4 厘米不等)。所有 23 名患者(100%)都取得了技术成功。21 名患者(91.3%)取得了临床成功。有 20 名患者(86.95%)在第 28 天出现反应。在第 4 周出现反应的 20 名患者中,有 18 名(90%)在第 4 周和第 8 周移除支架后出现 STR。5名患者(21.7%)发生了支架移位。单变量分析发现,狭窄长度、口径和支架长度可预测移位:结论:对良性 GOO 患者而言,全覆盖 SEMS 是一种有效、安全的治疗方式。结论:全覆盖 SEMS 是一种有效、安全的良性 GOO 患者治疗方法,但支架移位仍是一个令人头疼的缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Gastroenterology aims to help doctors everywhere practise better medicine and to influence the debate on gastroenterology. To achieve these aims, we publish original scientific studies, state-of -the-art special articles, reports and papers commenting on the clinical, scientific and public health factors affecting aspects of gastroenterology. We shall be delighted to receive articles for publication in all of these categories and letters commenting on the contents of the Journal or on issues of interest to our readers.
期刊最新文献
Transfusion-related lung complications are uncommon in non-ventilated liver failure patients undergoing low-volume plasma exchange. Esophagitis dissecans superficialis - An intimidating, but innocuous condition. Gastroparesis in a patient with benign joint hypermobility syndrome. Remitting seronegative symmetrical synovitis with pitting edema: An unusual paraneoplastic manifestation of metastatic gastrointestinal cancer. Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction- Is esophageal manometry enough to diagnose and treat?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1