Barriers and facilitators of screening postpartum depression by primary maternal health workers: A mixed methods study based on the normalization process theory

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Midwifery Pub Date : 2024-08-18 DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2024.104148
Zhen Zeng , Xiaoyu Li , Yanping Bai , Wenjie Gong
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators of screening postpartum depression by primary maternal health workers: A mixed methods study based on the normalization process theory","authors":"Zhen Zeng ,&nbsp;Xiaoyu Li ,&nbsp;Yanping Bai ,&nbsp;Wenjie Gong","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2024.104148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Postpartum depression (PPD) significantly impacts mothers and children's health. China aims to incorporate PPD screening in postpartum home visits, but research on implementation barriers and facilitators is scarce. We designed and implemented a new PPD screening program in Changsha, China, requiring maternal health workers to integrate PPD screening into their postpartum home visits.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To identify real-world barriers and facilitators associated with integrating PPD screening into routine home visits from the perspective of maternal health workers.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We employed a mixed-methods approach. Maternal health workers involved in the newly introduced PPD screening program were included. Guided by Normalization Process Theory (NPT), quantitative data were collected using the NoMAD instrument, and qualitative data were obtained through semi-structured interviews. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics for the survey and thematic analysis for the interviews.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All 42 maternal health workers involved in the new PPD program completed the quantitative survey, and nine participated in qualitative interviews. The NoMAD survey revealed high scores for Coherence and Cognitive Participation, but lower scores for Collective Action, particularly regarding insufficient skills and resource adequacy. Thematic analysis identified several barriers, including workload concerns, the need for enhanced psychological healthcare capacity, and lack of economic incentives. Facilitators included the integration of structured feedback and clear referral pathways.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Addressing identified barriers through targeted skill training, well-defined referral pathways, and formal recognition of the screening program in performance evaluations could help achieve successful normalization.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"138 ","pages":"Article 104148"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824002316","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Postpartum depression (PPD) significantly impacts mothers and children's health. China aims to incorporate PPD screening in postpartum home visits, but research on implementation barriers and facilitators is scarce. We designed and implemented a new PPD screening program in Changsha, China, requiring maternal health workers to integrate PPD screening into their postpartum home visits.

Aims

To identify real-world barriers and facilitators associated with integrating PPD screening into routine home visits from the perspective of maternal health workers.

Methods

We employed a mixed-methods approach. Maternal health workers involved in the newly introduced PPD screening program were included. Guided by Normalization Process Theory (NPT), quantitative data were collected using the NoMAD instrument, and qualitative data were obtained through semi-structured interviews. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics for the survey and thematic analysis for the interviews.

Results

All 42 maternal health workers involved in the new PPD program completed the quantitative survey, and nine participated in qualitative interviews. The NoMAD survey revealed high scores for Coherence and Cognitive Participation, but lower scores for Collective Action, particularly regarding insufficient skills and resource adequacy. Thematic analysis identified several barriers, including workload concerns, the need for enhanced psychological healthcare capacity, and lack of economic incentives. Facilitators included the integration of structured feedback and clear referral pathways.

Conclusion

Addressing identified barriers through targeted skill training, well-defined referral pathways, and formal recognition of the screening program in performance evaluations could help achieve successful normalization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基层孕产妇保健工作者筛查产后抑郁症的障碍和促进因素:基于正常化过程理论的混合方法研究。
背景:产后抑郁症(PPD)严重影响母亲和儿童的健康。中国的目标是在产后家访中纳入 PPD 筛查,但有关实施障碍和促进因素的研究却很少。我们在中国长沙设计并实施了一项新的PPD筛查项目,要求孕产妇保健工作者将PPD筛查纳入其产后家访中。目的:从孕产妇保健工作者的角度出发,找出将PPD筛查纳入常规家访的现实障碍和促进因素:我们采用了混合方法。方法:我们采用了混合方法,将参与新引入的 PPD 筛查项目的孕产妇保健工作者纳入其中。在规范化过程理论(NPT)的指导下,我们使用 NoMAD 工具收集定量数据,并通过半结构化访谈获得定性数据。调查数据采用描述性统计,访谈数据采用主题分析:所有参与新 PPD 计划的 42 名孕产妇保健工作者都完成了定量调查,9 人参加了定性访谈。NoMAD 调查显示,一致性和认知参与得分较高,但集体行动得分较低,尤其是在技能不足和资源充足方面。专题分析发现了一些障碍,包括工作量问题、加强心理保健能力的需要以及缺乏经济激励。促进因素包括整合结构化反馈和明确的转诊途径:通过有针对性的技能培训、明确的转诊途径以及在绩效评估中对筛查计划的正式认可来解决已发现的障碍,有助于成功实现正常化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board My ‘normal’ isn't your normal...What is maternal wellbeing? A scoping review How valuable is an implementation toolkit for midwives? An exploratory study Protecting mothers against posttraumatic stress symptoms related to childbirth: What's the role of formal and informal support? Decoding Newly Graduated Midwives: A Value-Based Philosophy of Vocational and Professional Midwifery Program in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1