Randomized Controlled Trial of a Novel Cementless vs. Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty: Early Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1111/os.14178
Enze Zhao, Xiaoyan Zhu, Haiwei Tang, Zhenyu Luo, Weinan Zeng, Zongke Zhou
{"title":"Randomized Controlled Trial of a Novel Cementless vs. Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty: Early Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes.","authors":"Enze Zhao, Xiaoyan Zhu, Haiwei Tang, Zhenyu Luo, Weinan Zeng, Zongke Zhou","doi":"10.1111/os.14178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Previous cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs faced challenges with insufficient initial fixation on tibial side, resulting in inferior functional outcomes and survival rates. The Zoned Trabecular Bone Cementless Knee is a novel implant designed for cementless TKA which aims to achieve excellent initial fixation, promoting effective osseointegration. The aim of this research was to compare the early clinical and radiographic results of this cementless TKA with cemented TKA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between September 2021 and April 2022, 64 patients (64 knees) were recruited in this prospective randomized controlled trial to receive either cementless 3D-printed trabecular metal TKA or a cemented posterior stabilized TKA. Preoperative and postoperative clinical evaluations, including the range of motion (ROM), Knee Society Score (KSS), and the Reduced Western Ontario and MacMaster Universities Score (WOMAC), were conducted and analyzed for comparison. Radiographs and computed tomography scans were utilized to assess the initial fixation. The complications between the two groups were also recorded and compared. Continuous data were analyzed for significance using independent-samples t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test and categorical data were analyzed using chi-squared or Fisher's exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups demonstrated significant enhancement at 12 months follow-up in the ROM compared with baseline (ROM: 94.7 ± 23.4 vs. 113.1 ± 12.3 in cementless group and 96.5 ± 14.7 vs. 111.0 ± 12.8 in cemented group, p < 0.05). However, no statistical differences were observed between the two groups in postoperative ROM, KSS, or WOMAC score. The radiographs and computed tomography scans showed similar results, including radiolucent lines and osteolysis in either femoral or tibial. Additionally, there was no statistical difference in the overall complication rate between the two groups. Notably, one patient in the cementless TKA group required revision for periprosthetic infection as the end point.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This novel 3D-printed trabecular metal cementless TKA achieved comparable clinical outcomes and initial fixation to cemented TKA in early stage. Longer-term examination is necessary to validate these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":19566,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2671-2679"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11541117/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14178","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Previous cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs faced challenges with insufficient initial fixation on tibial side, resulting in inferior functional outcomes and survival rates. The Zoned Trabecular Bone Cementless Knee is a novel implant designed for cementless TKA which aims to achieve excellent initial fixation, promoting effective osseointegration. The aim of this research was to compare the early clinical and radiographic results of this cementless TKA with cemented TKA.

Methods: Between September 2021 and April 2022, 64 patients (64 knees) were recruited in this prospective randomized controlled trial to receive either cementless 3D-printed trabecular metal TKA or a cemented posterior stabilized TKA. Preoperative and postoperative clinical evaluations, including the range of motion (ROM), Knee Society Score (KSS), and the Reduced Western Ontario and MacMaster Universities Score (WOMAC), were conducted and analyzed for comparison. Radiographs and computed tomography scans were utilized to assess the initial fixation. The complications between the two groups were also recorded and compared. Continuous data were analyzed for significance using independent-samples t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test and categorical data were analyzed using chi-squared or Fisher's exact test.

Results: Both groups demonstrated significant enhancement at 12 months follow-up in the ROM compared with baseline (ROM: 94.7 ± 23.4 vs. 113.1 ± 12.3 in cementless group and 96.5 ± 14.7 vs. 111.0 ± 12.8 in cemented group, p < 0.05). However, no statistical differences were observed between the two groups in postoperative ROM, KSS, or WOMAC score. The radiographs and computed tomography scans showed similar results, including radiolucent lines and osteolysis in either femoral or tibial. Additionally, there was no statistical difference in the overall complication rate between the two groups. Notably, one patient in the cementless TKA group required revision for periprosthetic infection as the end point.

Conclusions: This novel 3D-printed trabecular metal cementless TKA achieved comparable clinical outcomes and initial fixation to cemented TKA in early stage. Longer-term examination is necessary to validate these results.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新型无骨水泥与有骨水泥全膝关节置换术的随机对照试验:早期临床和影像学结果。
目的:以往的无骨水泥全膝关节置换术(TKA)设计面临胫骨侧初始固定不足的挑战,导致功能效果和存活率较差。Zoned Trabecular Bone Cementless Knee 是一种专为无骨水泥全膝关节置换术设计的新型植入物,旨在实现良好的初始固定,促进有效的骨结合。这项研究的目的是比较这种无骨水泥 TKA 与有骨水泥 TKA 的早期临床和影像学结果:在 2021 年 9 月至 2022 年 4 月期间,这项前瞻性随机对照试验招募了 64 名患者(64 个膝关节),他们将接受无骨水泥 3D 打印小梁金属 TKA 或骨水泥后稳定 TKA。对术前和术后的临床评估,包括活动范围(ROM)、膝关节社会评分(KSS)和西安大略和麦克马斯特大学降低评分(WOMAC)进行了分析和比较。X光片和计算机断层扫描用于评估初始固定情况。此外,还记录并比较了两组患者的并发症。连续数据的显著性分析采用独立样本t检验或曼-惠特尼U检验,分类数据的显著性分析采用卡方检验或费雪精确检验:结果:两组随访12个月后的ROM与基线相比均有明显改善(无骨水泥组ROM:94.7 ± 23.4 vs. 113.1 ± 12.3,有骨水泥组ROM:96.5 ± 14.7 vs. 111.0 ± 12.8,P 结论:这种新型的3D打印骨小梁是一种新型的3D打印骨小梁:这种新型三维打印金属骨小梁无骨水泥 TKA 在早期获得了与有骨水泥 TKA 相当的临床效果和初始固定。有必要进行更长期的检查来验证这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Surgery
Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedic Surgery (OS) is the official journal of the Chinese Orthopaedic Association, focusing on all aspects of orthopaedic technique and surgery. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles in the following categories: Original Articles, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Guidelines, Editorials, Commentaries, Surgical Techniques, Case Reports and Meeting Reports.
期刊最新文献
Is Pedicle-Screw Internal Fixation With Two Small Incisions Superior to Traditional MI-TLIF With Four Incisions? Preliminary Follow-Up Results. Comparison of Mobility and Health-Related Quality of Life Between Hemiarthroplasty and Total Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Prospective Cohort Study. Mechanical Evaluation of Suture Docking Method Versus Novel Tensegrity Suture Screw in Treating Varus Posterolateral Surrogate and Cadaveric Elbow Instability. Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Arthroscopic-Assisted Uniportal Spinal Surgery Versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Study. Correction to "The Principle of Limb Reconstruction-"One Walking, Two Lines, and Three Balances": A Retrospective Analysis of Post-Traumatic Lower Limb Deformity Correction".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1