Effects of Online Naloxone Training for Laypersons: An Extended-Baseline Assessment.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Substance Use & Misuse Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1080/10826084.2024.2392524
Wasantha Jayawardene, Hye Jeong Choi, Chesmi Kumbalatara, Jacob Ketuma, Justin McDaniel, Michael Hecht
{"title":"Effects of Online Naloxone Training for Laypersons: An Extended-Baseline Assessment.","authors":"Wasantha Jayawardene, Hye Jeong Choi, Chesmi Kumbalatara, Jacob Ketuma, Justin McDaniel, Michael Hecht","doi":"10.1080/10826084.2024.2392524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> While laypersons can play a crucial role in administering naloxone in opioid overdoses, they must be recruited and trained to effectively manage overdose events as good Samaritans. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of a technology-based intervention that recruited and trained laypersons to administer naloxone. <i>Methods:</i> Opioid Rapid Response System (ORRS) was an online recruitment and training intervention which capitalized on social cognitive theory and a digital media engagement model to mobilize laypersons to administer intranasal naloxone. ORRS was developed based on a randomized waitlisted controlled trial (<i>N</i> = 220). This secondary analysis is a within-group, extended-baseline assessment of the waitlisted group (<i>n</i> = 106), considering that they served as their own control prior to receiving the training. ORRS was conducted in five counties of Indiana with adults who did not self-identify as a certified first responder. Five indices were generated from 23 variables: knowledge of overdose signs, knowledge of overdose management, self-efficacy in responding, concerns about responding, and intent to respond. Paired t-test compared changes between 3 timepoints. <i>Results:</i> Three indices had significantly greater increases associated with training compared to extended baseline: recognizing opioid overdose signs (difference = 0.08; 95%CI = 0.02, 0.15; <i>t</i> = 2.48; <i>p</i> = 0.01); knowledge of overdose management (difference = 0.27; 95%CI = 0.18, 0.35; <i>t</i> = 5.99; <i>p</i> < 0.01); and self-efficacy in overdose management (difference = 0.68; 95%CI = 0.45, 0.91; <i>t</i> = 5.78; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Concerns related to overdose management significantly decreased as expected (difference = -1.53; 95%CI = -1.86, -1.21; t = -9.27; <i>p</i> < 0.01). <i>Conclusions:</i> ORRS provided strong support for self-efficacy, concerns, and knowledge related to overdose management, and the digital modality accelerates largescale dissemination.</p>","PeriodicalId":22088,"journal":{"name":"Substance Use & Misuse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Use & Misuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2024.2392524","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While laypersons can play a crucial role in administering naloxone in opioid overdoses, they must be recruited and trained to effectively manage overdose events as good Samaritans. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of a technology-based intervention that recruited and trained laypersons to administer naloxone. Methods: Opioid Rapid Response System (ORRS) was an online recruitment and training intervention which capitalized on social cognitive theory and a digital media engagement model to mobilize laypersons to administer intranasal naloxone. ORRS was developed based on a randomized waitlisted controlled trial (N = 220). This secondary analysis is a within-group, extended-baseline assessment of the waitlisted group (n = 106), considering that they served as their own control prior to receiving the training. ORRS was conducted in five counties of Indiana with adults who did not self-identify as a certified first responder. Five indices were generated from 23 variables: knowledge of overdose signs, knowledge of overdose management, self-efficacy in responding, concerns about responding, and intent to respond. Paired t-test compared changes between 3 timepoints. Results: Three indices had significantly greater increases associated with training compared to extended baseline: recognizing opioid overdose signs (difference = 0.08; 95%CI = 0.02, 0.15; t = 2.48; p = 0.01); knowledge of overdose management (difference = 0.27; 95%CI = 0.18, 0.35; t = 5.99; p < 0.01); and self-efficacy in overdose management (difference = 0.68; 95%CI = 0.45, 0.91; t = 5.78; p < 0.01). Concerns related to overdose management significantly decreased as expected (difference = -1.53; 95%CI = -1.86, -1.21; t = -9.27; p < 0.01). Conclusions: ORRS provided strong support for self-efficacy, concerns, and knowledge related to overdose management, and the digital modality accelerates largescale dissemination.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纳洛酮在线培训对普通人的影响:扩展基线评估
背景:虽然非专业人员在阿片类药物过量时施用纳洛酮可发挥关键作用,但他们必须经过招募和培训,才能作为撒玛利亚好人有效处理药物过量事件。本研究旨在考察一种基于技术的干预措施的有效性,该措施招募并培训非专业人员施用纳洛酮。方法:阿片类药物快速反应系统阿片类药物快速反应系统(ORRS)是一种在线招募和培训干预措施,它利用社会认知理论和数字媒体参与模式来动员非专业人员施用鼻内纳洛酮。ORRS 是在随机等待对照试验(N = 220)的基础上开发的。本二次分析是对候选组(n = 106)进行的组内扩展基线评估,考虑到他们在接受培训前是自己的对照组。ORRS 在印第安纳州的五个县对未自我认定为认证急救员的成年人进行了调查。从 23 个变量中得出了五个指数:对用药过量征兆的了解、对用药过量管理的了解、应对的自我效能感、对应对的担忧以及应对的意愿。通过配对 t 检验比较了 3 个时间点之间的变化。结果:与延长的基线相比,有三项指标在培训后有明显增加:识别阿片类药物过量征兆(差异 = 0.08;95%CI = 0.02,0.15;t = 2.48;p = 0.01);过量管理知识(差异 = 0.27;95%CI = 0.18,0.35;t = 5.99;p t = 5.78;p p 结论:ORRS 为自我应对能力提供了强有力的支持:ORRS 为与用药过量管理相关的自我效能、担忧和知识提供了强有力的支持,数字模式加快了大规模传播的速度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Substance Use & Misuse
Substance Use & Misuse 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 50 years, Substance Use & Misuse (formerly The International Journal of the Addictions) has provided a unique international multidisciplinary venue for the exchange of original research, theories, policy analyses, and unresolved issues concerning substance use and misuse (licit and illicit drugs, alcohol, nicotine, and eating disorders). Guest editors for special issues devoted to single topics of current concern are invited. Topics covered include: Clinical trials and clinical research (treatment and prevention of substance misuse and related infectious diseases) Epidemiology of substance misuse and related infectious diseases Social pharmacology Meta-analyses and systematic reviews Translation of scientific findings to real world clinical and other settings Adolescent and student-focused research State of the art quantitative and qualitative research Policy analyses Negative results and intervention failures that are instructive Validity studies of instruments, scales, and tests that are generalizable Critiques and essays on unresolved issues Authors can choose to publish gold open access in this journal.
期刊最新文献
Patterns of Alcohol, Cannabis, and E-Cigarette Use/Co-Use and Mental Health Among U.S. College Students. Associations of Minority Stressors, Alcohol Use Disorder, Resilience, and HIV Testing Self-Efficacy Among Community-Based Black Men Who Have Sex with Men in a Southern U.S. City: A Causal Mediation and Moderation Analysis. Differentiating the Contribution of Context-Specific Social Influences on Underage Youth's Alcohol Consumption. Flavored Tobacco User Characteristics in U.S. young Adults: Wave 5 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study. Use of cannabis for mental health in the Canadian territories: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1