Perceptions of disposal options for unused opioid analgesics among people who have been prescribed an opioid analgesic in North Carolina.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1080/00952990.2024.2386536
Cassidy Joyce, Alice R Richman, Melissa J Cox, Donald W Helme, J Todd Jackson, Mahdi Sesay, Kathleen L Egan
{"title":"Perceptions of disposal options for unused opioid analgesics among people who have been prescribed an opioid analgesic in North Carolina.","authors":"Cassidy Joyce, Alice R Richman, Melissa J Cox, Donald W Helme, J Todd Jackson, Mahdi Sesay, Kathleen L Egan","doi":"10.1080/00952990.2024.2386536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Medication disposal programs have been promoted as one solution to the opioid crisis, but uptake by community members has been minimal.<i>Objectives:</i> To clarify perceptions of medication disposal options among people who have been prescribed an opioid analgesic in North Carolina to inform interventions that can facilitate the disposal of unused opioids.<i>Methods:</i> In 2022, we conducted focus groups with participants who received an opioid medication in the past year to gain information to develop an intervention related to the disposal of unused opioid medication (12 focus group discussions (FGDs); total <i>N</i> = 37; 30 identified as female, 6 as male, and 1 as another gender). Participants were shown a slide with the Food and Drug Administration's recommended disposal options and asked about their perceptions of each option. Themes were derived using an inductive, thematic, qualitative approach.<i>Results:</i> Seven themes about perceptions of medication disposal programs emerged from the data. Four of the themes reflect potential barriers to medication disposal: failed disposal attempts, lack of sufficient education on proper disposal, unclear meaning of specific disposal language, and concerns about existing disposal options. Three of the themes provide insight on potential facilitators of medication disposal: preference of low-cost disposal options, ease and accessibility among disposal methods, and preferred disposal methods.<i>Conclusion:</i> Patients should be provided clear and consistent guidance from prescribers and dispensing pharmacists on when and how to dispose of unused medications and opportunities to dispose of medications at no cost to the patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":48957,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2024.2386536","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medication disposal programs have been promoted as one solution to the opioid crisis, but uptake by community members has been minimal.Objectives: To clarify perceptions of medication disposal options among people who have been prescribed an opioid analgesic in North Carolina to inform interventions that can facilitate the disposal of unused opioids.Methods: In 2022, we conducted focus groups with participants who received an opioid medication in the past year to gain information to develop an intervention related to the disposal of unused opioid medication (12 focus group discussions (FGDs); total N = 37; 30 identified as female, 6 as male, and 1 as another gender). Participants were shown a slide with the Food and Drug Administration's recommended disposal options and asked about their perceptions of each option. Themes were derived using an inductive, thematic, qualitative approach.Results: Seven themes about perceptions of medication disposal programs emerged from the data. Four of the themes reflect potential barriers to medication disposal: failed disposal attempts, lack of sufficient education on proper disposal, unclear meaning of specific disposal language, and concerns about existing disposal options. Three of the themes provide insight on potential facilitators of medication disposal: preference of low-cost disposal options, ease and accessibility among disposal methods, and preferred disposal methods.Conclusion: Patients should be provided clear and consistent guidance from prescribers and dispensing pharmacists on when and how to dispose of unused medications and opportunities to dispose of medications at no cost to the patient.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
北卡罗来纳州开出阿片类镇痛药处方的人群对未使用阿片类镇痛药处置方案的看法。
背景:药物处置计划已被作为阿片类药物危机的一种解决方案加以推广,但社区成员对该计划的接受度却很低:目的:澄清北卡罗来纳州被处方阿片类镇痛药的人群对药物处置选择的看法,为促进未使用阿片类药物处置的干预措施提供信息:2022 年,我们与去年接受过阿片类药物治疗的参与者进行了焦点小组讨论,以获取信息,从而制定与未使用阿片类药物处置相关的干预措施(12 次焦点小组讨论;总人数 = 37;其中 30 人为女性,6 人为男性,1 人为其他性别)。向参与者展示了一张幻灯片,上面有食品与药物管理局推荐的处理方案,并询问他们对每种方案的看法。采用归纳、主题、定性的方法得出了主题:结果:从数据中得出了七个关于对药物处置方案看法的主题。其中四个主题反映了药物处置的潜在障碍:处置尝试失败、缺乏足够的正确处置教育、特定处置语言含义不清以及对现有处置方案的担忧。其中三个主题提供了药物处置的潜在促进因素:低成本处置方案的偏好、处置方法的简易性和可及性以及首选处置方法:结论:处方医生和配药药剂师应为患者提供清晰一致的指导,告知患者何时以及如何处置未使用的药物,并为患者提供免费处置药物的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse (AJDAA) is an international journal published six times per year and provides an important and stimulating venue for the exchange of ideas between the researchers working in diverse areas, including public policy, epidemiology, neurobiology, and the treatment of addictive disorders. AJDAA includes a wide range of translational research, covering preclinical and clinical aspects of the field. AJDAA covers these topics with focused data presentations and authoritative reviews of timely developments in our field. Manuscripts exploring addictions other than substance use disorders are encouraged. Reviews and Perspectives of emerging fields are given priority consideration. Areas of particular interest include: public health policy; novel research methodologies; human and animal pharmacology; human translational studies, including neuroimaging; pharmacological and behavioral treatments; new modalities of care; molecular and family genetic studies; medicinal use of substances traditionally considered substances of abuse.
期刊最新文献
Digital cognitive-behavioral therapy for substance use: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Risk factors of overdose in maternal patients with opioid use disorder: a scoping review. Substance use and help seeking as coping behaviors among parents and unpaid caregivers of adults in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. Plasma leptin levels are lower in females, but not males, with ketamine use disorder. Geographic trends in overall and long-acting opioid prescriptions under Medicaid and Medicare Part D in the United States, 2013-2021.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1