CT Surveillance for Local Recurrence After Pancreatic Cancer Resection: Evaluation of Imaging Findings From the SAR Disease-Focused Panel Consensus Statement.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING American Journal of Roentgenology Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI:10.2214/AJR.24.31563
Tae-Hyung Kim, Shannan M Dickinson, Wyanne Law, Galina Levin, Jonathan Kuten, Naaz Nasar, Lee Rodriguez, Alice C Wei, Richard Kinh Gian Do
{"title":"CT Surveillance for Local Recurrence After Pancreatic Cancer Resection: Evaluation of Imaging Findings From the SAR Disease-Focused Panel Consensus Statement.","authors":"Tae-Hyung Kim, Shannan M Dickinson, Wyanne Law, Galina Levin, Jonathan Kuten, Naaz Nasar, Lee Rodriguez, Alice C Wei, Richard Kinh Gian Do","doi":"10.2214/AJR.24.31563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> A Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) Disease-Focused Panel (DFP) consensus statement described findings suspicious for local recurrence (LR) on surveillance imaging after PDAC resection. <b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the interreader agreement and predictive utility of potential imaging findings of LR on serial surveillance CT examinations after Whipple procedure for PDAC, using the SAR PDAC DFP consensus statement. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective study included 126 patients (mean age, 68.5±10.3 years; 72 men, 54 women) who underwent Whipple surgery for PDAC between January 2009 and December 2014. Three radiologists independently reviewed baseline and subsequent postoperative contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT examinations performed within 2 years postoperatively, evaluating features in the SAR PDAC DFP consensus statement relating to surgical bed stranding, surgical bed soft tissue, vessel encasement, main pancreatic duct dilatation, and ascites. Interreader agreement was calculated. The reference standard for LR development within 2 years postoperatively incorporated all available information. Imaging features' frequencies were calculated for recurrence examinations (i.e., first surveillance examinations indicating LR). For baseline postoperative examinations, features associations' with eventual LR development were assessed by multivariable logistic regression analysis. <b>Results:</b> LR developed within 2 years postoperatively in 81/126 patients. For both baseline and subsequent examinations, agreement for stranding and soft tissue morphology were poor, for vessel encasement was fair, for soft tissue and ascites were moderate, and for main pancreatic duct dilatation was substantial. On recurrence examinations, across readers, new or increased stranding was present in 27-77%; new or increased soft tissue, 80-86%; soft tissue with vessel encasement and luminal narrowing, 36-59%; new or increased main pancreatic duct dilatation, 25-26%; and new or increased ascites, 20-23%. On baseline postoperative examinations, independent predictors of eventual LR were soft tissue for all three readers (OR=2.78-6.85) and stranding for reader 1 (OR=3.59); main pancreatic duct dilatation and ascites were not independent predictors of LR for any reader. <b>Conclusion:</b> This study highlights the role of soft tissue, particularly when associated with vessel encasement and luminal narrowing, in raising suspicion for LR after PDAC resection. <b>Clinical Impact:</b> This study supports the SAR PDAC DFP consensus statement, while highlighting opportunities for continued optimization.</p>","PeriodicalId":55529,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Roentgenology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Roentgenology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.24.31563","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) Disease-Focused Panel (DFP) consensus statement described findings suspicious for local recurrence (LR) on surveillance imaging after PDAC resection. Objective: To evaluate the interreader agreement and predictive utility of potential imaging findings of LR on serial surveillance CT examinations after Whipple procedure for PDAC, using the SAR PDAC DFP consensus statement. Methods: This retrospective study included 126 patients (mean age, 68.5±10.3 years; 72 men, 54 women) who underwent Whipple surgery for PDAC between January 2009 and December 2014. Three radiologists independently reviewed baseline and subsequent postoperative contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT examinations performed within 2 years postoperatively, evaluating features in the SAR PDAC DFP consensus statement relating to surgical bed stranding, surgical bed soft tissue, vessel encasement, main pancreatic duct dilatation, and ascites. Interreader agreement was calculated. The reference standard for LR development within 2 years postoperatively incorporated all available information. Imaging features' frequencies were calculated for recurrence examinations (i.e., first surveillance examinations indicating LR). For baseline postoperative examinations, features associations' with eventual LR development were assessed by multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: LR developed within 2 years postoperatively in 81/126 patients. For both baseline and subsequent examinations, agreement for stranding and soft tissue morphology were poor, for vessel encasement was fair, for soft tissue and ascites were moderate, and for main pancreatic duct dilatation was substantial. On recurrence examinations, across readers, new or increased stranding was present in 27-77%; new or increased soft tissue, 80-86%; soft tissue with vessel encasement and luminal narrowing, 36-59%; new or increased main pancreatic duct dilatation, 25-26%; and new or increased ascites, 20-23%. On baseline postoperative examinations, independent predictors of eventual LR were soft tissue for all three readers (OR=2.78-6.85) and stranding for reader 1 (OR=3.59); main pancreatic duct dilatation and ascites were not independent predictors of LR for any reader. Conclusion: This study highlights the role of soft tissue, particularly when associated with vessel encasement and luminal narrowing, in raising suspicion for LR after PDAC resection. Clinical Impact: This study supports the SAR PDAC DFP consensus statement, while highlighting opportunities for continued optimization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胰腺癌切除术后局部复发的 CT 监测:胰腺癌切除术后局部复发的 CT 监测:评估 SAR 疾病聚焦小组共识声明中的成像结果。
背景:腹部放射学会(SAR)胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)疾病聚焦小组(DFP)的一份共识声明描述了 PDAC 切除术后监测成像中怀疑局部复发(LR)的结果。目的使用 SAR PDAC DFP 共识声明,评估 PDAC Whipple 术后系列监视 CT 检查中 LR 潜在成像结果的阅片者间一致性和预测效用。方法:这项回顾性研究纳入了 2009 年 1 月至 2014 年 12 月期间因 PDAC 而接受 Whipple 手术的 126 名患者(平均年龄为 68.5±10.3 岁;72 名男性,54 名女性)。三位放射科专家独立审查了基线和术后两年内进行的对比增强腹盆腔 CT 检查,评估了 SAR PDAC DFP 共识声明中有关手术床搁浅、手术床软组织、血管包裹、主胰管扩张和腹水的特征。计算了读片者之间的一致性。术后 2 年内发生 LR 的参考标准包含了所有可用信息。计算复发检查(即首次监测检查显示 LR)的成像特征频率。对于术后基线检查,通过多变量逻辑回归分析评估了特征与最终 LR 发展的相关性。结果显示81/126例患者在术后2年内出现LR。在基线检查和后续检查中,搁浅和软组织形态的一致性较差,血管包裹的一致性一般,软组织和腹水的一致性中等,主胰管扩张的一致性很大。在复发检查中,不同读者中新出现或加重绞窄的占 27-77%;新出现或加重软组织的占 80-86%;软组织伴有血管包裹和管腔狭窄的占 36-59%;新出现或加重主胰管扩张的占 25-26%;新出现或加重腹水的占 20-23%。在术后基线检查中,所有三位读者的软组织(OR=2.78-6.85)和读者 1 的绞窄(OR=3.59)是最终 LR 的独立预测因素;主胰管扩张和腹水对任何读者来说都不是 LR 的独立预测因素。结论:本研究强调了软组织的作用,尤其是当软组织伴有血管包裹和管腔狭窄时,可引起对 PDAC 切除术后 LR 的怀疑。临床影响:本研究支持 SAR PDAC DFP 共识声明,同时强调了继续优化的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
920
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1907, the monthly American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR) is the world’s longest continuously published general radiology journal. AJR is recognized as among the specialty’s leading peer-reviewed journals and has a worldwide circulation of close to 25,000. The journal publishes clinically-oriented articles across all radiology subspecialties, seeking relevance to radiologists’ daily practice. The journal publishes hundreds of articles annually with a diverse range of formats, including original research, reviews, clinical perspectives, editorials, and other short reports. The journal engages its audience through a spectrum of social media and digital communication activities.
期刊最新文献
MR and Ultrasound Elastography for Fibrosis Assessment in Children: Practical Implementation and Supporting Evidence-AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review. A Musculoskeletal Radiology Medical School Elective Rotation: Perspective of an Orthopedic Surgery Subintern. Effect of Vessel Attenuation, VMI Level, and Reconstruction Kernel on Pericoronary Adipose Tissue Attenuation for EID CT and PCD CT: An Ex Vivo Porcine Heart Study. Editorial Comment: A Road Map for Implementing Transarterial Embolization in the Management of Chronic Joint Pain. Editorial Comment: An Alternate Method for Primary Breast Cancer Screening in Low-Resource Settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1