Patient perspectives on primary care behavioral health integration in an urban mental health professional shortage area: Benefits, facilitators, and barriers.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES Families Systems & Health Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1037/fsh0000912
Anya Agrawal, Erin M Staab, Fabiana S Araújo, Daily Desenberg, Neda Laiteerapong
{"title":"Patient perspectives on primary care behavioral health integration in an urban mental health professional shortage area: Benefits, facilitators, and barriers.","authors":"Anya Agrawal, Erin M Staab, Fabiana S Araújo, Daily Desenberg, Neda Laiteerapong","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>While studies have described the benefits of integrating behavioral health (BH) into primary care (PC), few have examined patients' perspectives, especially in large, urban health systems. In 2015, the University of Chicago Medicine launched the Primary Care Behavioral Health Integration Program, located in a mental health professional shortage area.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In 2021, semistructured interviews were conducted with adult patients who had discussed their depression symptoms with their primary care clinician (PCC). Participants were asked about their experiences of being screened for depression, discussing BH, and being referred to behavioral health clinicians (BHCs). Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis and constant comparison, and they were conducted until theme saturation was achieved.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen participants were interviewed, the majority of whom were women and African American/Black, with an average age of 52. Participants expressed that PC-BH integration helps patients recognize BH problems and navigate the BH care system, emphasizes the connection between physical and mental health, and eases conversations through familiar setting and established trust. Patients enumerated barriers to integration, including barriers to BH care in the PC setting, barriers to BH conversations with PCCs/BHCs, and barriers to referrals to psychiatry/external therapy. Patients highlighted facilitators of integration, including trust with their PCC, collaboration between PCCs and BHCs, and population-level screening.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These perspectives affirm the core strength of PC-BH integration: making BH more accessible and destigmatizing, especially for underserved communities. They also emphasize the importance of collaboration between PCCs and BHCs, shared identities, and actively involving patients in program design and quality improvement interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55612,"journal":{"name":"Families Systems & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Families Systems & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000912","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: While studies have described the benefits of integrating behavioral health (BH) into primary care (PC), few have examined patients' perspectives, especially in large, urban health systems. In 2015, the University of Chicago Medicine launched the Primary Care Behavioral Health Integration Program, located in a mental health professional shortage area.

Method: In 2021, semistructured interviews were conducted with adult patients who had discussed their depression symptoms with their primary care clinician (PCC). Participants were asked about their experiences of being screened for depression, discussing BH, and being referred to behavioral health clinicians (BHCs). Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis and constant comparison, and they were conducted until theme saturation was achieved.

Results: Fifteen participants were interviewed, the majority of whom were women and African American/Black, with an average age of 52. Participants expressed that PC-BH integration helps patients recognize BH problems and navigate the BH care system, emphasizes the connection between physical and mental health, and eases conversations through familiar setting and established trust. Patients enumerated barriers to integration, including barriers to BH care in the PC setting, barriers to BH conversations with PCCs/BHCs, and barriers to referrals to psychiatry/external therapy. Patients highlighted facilitators of integration, including trust with their PCC, collaboration between PCCs and BHCs, and population-level screening.

Discussion: These perspectives affirm the core strength of PC-BH integration: making BH more accessible and destigmatizing, especially for underserved communities. They also emphasize the importance of collaboration between PCCs and BHCs, shared identities, and actively involving patients in program design and quality improvement interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者对城市精神卫生专业人员短缺地区初级保健行为健康整合的看法:好处、促进因素和障碍。
导言:虽然已有研究描述了将行为健康(BH)纳入初级医疗(PC)的益处,但很少有研究从患者的角度出发,尤其是在大型城市医疗系统中。2015 年,芝加哥大学医学院在精神卫生专业人员短缺地区启动了初级医疗行为健康整合项目:2021 年,我们对曾与初级保健临床医生(PCC)讨论过抑郁症状的成年患者进行了半结构化访谈。我们询问了参与者在接受抑郁症筛查、讨论 BH 以及转诊至行为健康临床医生(BHC)方面的经历。访谈采用主题分析和不断比较的方法进行分析,直到主题达到饱和为止:15 名参与者接受了访谈,其中大多数为女性和非裔美国人/黑人,平均年龄为 52 岁。参与者表示,PC-BH 整合有助于患者认识到 BH 问题并了解 BH 护理系统,强调身体健康与心理健康之间的联系,并通过熟悉的环境和建立的信任缓解对话。患者列举了整合的障碍,包括在 PC 环境中进行 BH 护理的障碍、与 PCC/BHC 进行 BH 交谈的障碍,以及转诊至精神科/外部治疗的障碍。患者强调了整合的促进因素,包括与他们的 PCC 之间的信任、PCC 与 BHC 之间的合作以及人口层面的筛查:这些观点肯定了 PC-BH 整合的核心优势:使 BH 更容易获得并消除耻辱感,尤其是对于服务不足的社区。这些观点还强调了初级保健中心与社区健康中心之间的合作、共同的身份以及让患者积极参与项目设计和质量改进干预的重要性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Families Systems & Health
Families Systems & Health HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
81
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Families, Systems, & Health publishes clinical research, training, and theoretical contributions in the areas of families and health, with particular focus on collaborative family healthcare.
期刊最新文献
Effect of a diabetes education program on family members' attitudes toward diabetes. Using virtual simulation to teach substance use screening and brief intervention skills across the health professions: Examining training outcomes among an interprofessional graduate student sample. Family functioning and the implications for adult weight management. Establishing an accountability benchmark for equity, diversity, and inclusion: A 10-year scoping review of Families, Systems, & Health. Factors leading to patient disengagement for unknown reasons in virtual collaborative care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1