At the Scrub Sink: Permanent Versus Absorbable Sutures for Sacrocolpopexy Vaginal Mesh Fixation.

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.) Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-10 DOI:10.1097/SPV.0000000000001569
Sherif A El-Nashar
{"title":"At the Scrub Sink: Permanent Versus Absorbable Sutures for Sacrocolpopexy Vaginal Mesh Fixation.","authors":"Sherif A El-Nashar","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Thirty years ago, open sacrocolpopexy was the main route for the procedure, and at that time, most surgeons used permanent sutures to attach the mesh to the vagina. With the changes to laparoscopic and robotic-assisted routes, some urogynecologists started using delayed absorbable sutures while others continued using permanent sutures. The current data suggest no increased failures with delayed absorbable sutures. Given that the risk of suture exposure is almost eliminated with delayed absorbable sutures, it is reasonable to use delayed absorbable sutures in attaching the mesh to the vagina over permanent sutures. Regardless of the suture selection, the 10% long-term mesh exposure rate after sacrocolpopexy should prompt us to continue discussing and working on solutions to lower the mesh exposure rate and improve prolapse surgery outcomes for our patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Thirty years ago, open sacrocolpopexy was the main route for the procedure, and at that time, most surgeons used permanent sutures to attach the mesh to the vagina. With the changes to laparoscopic and robotic-assisted routes, some urogynecologists started using delayed absorbable sutures while others continued using permanent sutures. The current data suggest no increased failures with delayed absorbable sutures. Given that the risk of suture exposure is almost eliminated with delayed absorbable sutures, it is reasonable to use delayed absorbable sutures in attaching the mesh to the vagina over permanent sutures. Regardless of the suture selection, the 10% long-term mesh exposure rate after sacrocolpopexy should prompt us to continue discussing and working on solutions to lower the mesh exposure rate and improve prolapse surgery outcomes for our patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在洗刷池:骶骨整形阴道网片固定的永久缝合线与可吸收缝合线。
摘要:三十年前,开腹骶骨结肠切除术是该手术的主要途径,当时大多数外科医生使用永久性缝合线将网片固定在阴道上。随着腹腔镜和机器人辅助路径的改变,一些泌尿妇科医生开始使用延迟可吸收缝合线,而另一些则继续使用永久缝合线。目前的数据表明,延迟可吸收缝合线的失败率并没有增加。鉴于延迟可吸收缝合线几乎消除了缝合线暴露的风险,因此使用延迟可吸收缝合线将网片固定在阴道上比使用永久缝合线更合理。无论选择哪种缝合方式,骶尾部结肠切除术后 10% 的网片长期暴露率都应促使我们继续讨论和研究降低网片暴露率的解决方案,并改善患者的脱垂手术效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development and Validation of a Simulation Model for Ureteral Stent Placement. Implementing a Digital Platform for Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections. Unexpected Pathology During Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair in an Urban Population. Green Cystoscopy: Does Minimizing the Use of Drapes Increase Infection Rates? Noninferiority Randomized Clinical Trial: KIM Sling With Reusable Trocars Versus TVT Exact Sling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1