Addressing intra- and inter-institution variability of a radiomic framework based on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in prostate cancer

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Medical physics Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1002/mp.17355
Letizia Morelli, Chiara Paganelli, Giulia Marvaso, Giovanni Parrella, Simone Annunziata, Maria Giulia Vicini, Mattia Zaffaroni, Matteo Pepa, Paul Eugene Summers, Ottavio De Cobelli, Giuseppe Petralia, Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa, Guido Baroni
{"title":"Addressing intra- and inter-institution variability of a radiomic framework based on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in prostate cancer","authors":"Letizia Morelli,&nbsp;Chiara Paganelli,&nbsp;Giulia Marvaso,&nbsp;Giovanni Parrella,&nbsp;Simone Annunziata,&nbsp;Maria Giulia Vicini,&nbsp;Mattia Zaffaroni,&nbsp;Matteo Pepa,&nbsp;Paul Eugene Summers,&nbsp;Ottavio De Cobelli,&nbsp;Giuseppe Petralia,&nbsp;Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa,&nbsp;Guido Baroni","doi":"10.1002/mp.17355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Prostate cancer (PCa) is a highly heterogeneous disease, making tailored treatment approaches challenging. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), notably diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and the derived Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) maps, plays a crucial role in PCa characterization. In this context, radiomics is a very promising approach able to disclose insights from MRI data. However, the sensitivity of radiomic features to MRI settings, encompassing DWI protocols and multicenter variations, requires the development of robust and generalizable models.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To develop a comprehensive radiomics framework for noninvasive PCa characterization using ADC maps, focusing on identifying reliable imaging biomarkers against intra- and inter-institution variations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and methods</h3>\n \n <p>Two patient cohorts, including an internal cohort (118 PCa patients) used for both training (75%) and hold-out testing (25%), and an external cohort (50 PCa patients) for independent testing, were employed in the study. DWI images were acquired with three different DWI protocols on two different MRI scanners: two DWI protocols acquired on a 1.5-T scanner for the internal cohort, and one DWI protocol acquired on a 3-T scanner for the external cohort. One hundred and seven radiomics features (i.e., shape, first order, texture) were extracted from ADC maps of the whole prostate gland. To address variations in DWI protocols and multicenter variability, a dedicated pipeline, including two-way ANOVA, sequential-feature-selection (SFS), and ComBat features harmonization was implemented. Mann–Whitney <i>U</i>-tests (<i>α</i> = 0.05) were performed to find statistically significant features dividing patients with different tumor characteristics in terms of Gleason score (GS) and T-stage. Support-Vector-Machine models were then developed to predict GS and T-stage, and the performance was assessed through the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver-operating-characteristic curves.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Downstream of ANOVA, two subsets of 38 and 41 features stable against DWI protocol were identified for GS and T-stage, respectively. Among these, SFS revealed the most predictive features, yielding an AUC of 0.75 (GS) and 0.70 (T-stage) in the hold-out test. Employing ComBat harmonization improved the external-test performance of the GS model, raising AUC from 0.72 to 0.78.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>By incorporating stable features with a harmonization procedure and validating the model on an external dataset, model robustness, and generalizability were assessed, highlighting the potential of ADC and radiomics for PCa characterization.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18384,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":"51 11","pages":"8096-8107"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mp.17355","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.17355","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a highly heterogeneous disease, making tailored treatment approaches challenging. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), notably diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and the derived Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) maps, plays a crucial role in PCa characterization. In this context, radiomics is a very promising approach able to disclose insights from MRI data. However, the sensitivity of radiomic features to MRI settings, encompassing DWI protocols and multicenter variations, requires the development of robust and generalizable models.

Purpose

To develop a comprehensive radiomics framework for noninvasive PCa characterization using ADC maps, focusing on identifying reliable imaging biomarkers against intra- and inter-institution variations.

Materials and methods

Two patient cohorts, including an internal cohort (118 PCa patients) used for both training (75%) and hold-out testing (25%), and an external cohort (50 PCa patients) for independent testing, were employed in the study. DWI images were acquired with three different DWI protocols on two different MRI scanners: two DWI protocols acquired on a 1.5-T scanner for the internal cohort, and one DWI protocol acquired on a 3-T scanner for the external cohort. One hundred and seven radiomics features (i.e., shape, first order, texture) were extracted from ADC maps of the whole prostate gland. To address variations in DWI protocols and multicenter variability, a dedicated pipeline, including two-way ANOVA, sequential-feature-selection (SFS), and ComBat features harmonization was implemented. Mann–Whitney U-tests (α = 0.05) were performed to find statistically significant features dividing patients with different tumor characteristics in terms of Gleason score (GS) and T-stage. Support-Vector-Machine models were then developed to predict GS and T-stage, and the performance was assessed through the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver-operating-characteristic curves.

Results

Downstream of ANOVA, two subsets of 38 and 41 features stable against DWI protocol were identified for GS and T-stage, respectively. Among these, SFS revealed the most predictive features, yielding an AUC of 0.75 (GS) and 0.70 (T-stage) in the hold-out test. Employing ComBat harmonization improved the external-test performance of the GS model, raising AUC from 0.72 to 0.78.

Conclusion

By incorporating stable features with a harmonization procedure and validating the model on an external dataset, model robustness, and generalizability were assessed, highlighting the potential of ADC and radiomics for PCa characterization.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解决基于前列腺癌表观扩散系数的放射学框架在机构内和机构间的差异。
背景:前列腺癌(PCa)是一种高度异质性的疾病,使得量身定制的治疗方法具有挑战性。磁共振成像(MRI),尤其是弥散加权成像(DWI)和衍生的表观弥散系数(ADC)图,在 PCa 特征描述中起着至关重要的作用。在这种情况下,放射组学是一种非常有前途的方法,它能从核磁共振成像数据中揭示疾病的本质。然而,放射组学特征对核磁共振成像设置(包括 DWI 方案和多中心差异)的敏感性要求开发稳健、可推广的模型。目的:利用 ADC 图开发用于非侵入性 PCa 特征描述的综合放射组学框架,重点是针对机构内和机构间的差异确定可靠的成像生物标志物:研究采用了两个患者队列,包括一个用于训练(75%)和暂缓测试(25%)的内部队列(118 名 PCa 患者)和一个用于独立测试的外部队列(50 名 PCa 患者)。在两台不同的磁共振成像扫描仪上采用三种不同的 DWI 方案采集 DWI 图像:内部队列采用 1.5-T 扫描仪采集的两种 DWI 方案,外部队列采用 3-T 扫描仪采集的一种 DWI 方案。从整个前列腺的 ADC 图中提取了 107 个放射组学特征(即形状、一阶、纹理)。为了解决 DWI 方案的差异和多中心变异问题,我们采用了一个专门的管道,包括双向方差分析、序列特征选择(SFS)和 ComBat 特征协调。通过 Mann-Whitney U 检验(α = 0.05)发现了具有统计学意义的特征,根据 Gleason 评分(GS)和 T 分期将不同肿瘤特征的患者区分开来。然后建立了支持向量机模型来预测GS和T分期,并通过接受者操作特征曲线的曲线下面积(AUC)来评估其性能:结果:在方差分析的下游,分别为 GS 和 T 分期确定了 38 和 41 个对 DWI 方案稳定的特征子集。其中,SFS显示了最具预测性的特征,在保持测试中的AUC为0.75(GS)和0.70(T期)。采用 ComBat 协调技术提高了 GS 模型的外部测试性能,将 AUC 从 0.72 提高到 0.78:通过将稳定特征纳入协调程序并在外部数据集上对模型进行验证,评估了模型的稳健性和可推广性,凸显了 ADC 和放射组学在 PCa 特征描述方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical physics
Medical physics 医学-核医学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
660
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Medical Physics publishes original, high impact physics, imaging science, and engineering research that advances patient diagnosis and therapy through contributions in 1) Basic science developments with high potential for clinical translation 2) Clinical applications of cutting edge engineering and physics innovations 3) Broadly applicable and innovative clinical physics developments Medical Physics is a journal of global scope and reach. By publishing in Medical Physics your research will reach an international, multidisciplinary audience including practicing medical physicists as well as physics- and engineering based translational scientists. We work closely with authors of promising articles to improve their quality.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Cover List of Advertisers Issue Information List of Advertisers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1