Evaluating machine learning models in predicting GRI drought indicators (case study: Ajabshir area)

IF 5.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 WATER RESOURCES Applied Water Science Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1007/s13201-024-02224-0
Mahtab Faramarzpour, Ali Saremi, Amir Khosrojerdi, Hossain Babazadeh
{"title":"Evaluating machine learning models in predicting GRI drought indicators (case study: Ajabshir area)","authors":"Mahtab Faramarzpour,&nbsp;Ali Saremi,&nbsp;Amir Khosrojerdi,&nbsp;Hossain Babazadeh","doi":"10.1007/s13201-024-02224-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Examining the condition of groundwater resources and the impact of droughts is valuable for effective water resources management. Today, machine learning (ML) models are recognized as one of the useful tools in time series predictions. In this study, the groundwater condition of one of the most important aquifers in northwest Iran was investigated using MODFLOW, followed by estimating the groundwater resource index (GRI) utilizing the multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS) and least squares support vector regression (LSSVR) for a period between 2001 and 2019. Meteorological and hydrological drought indicators along with precipitation and flow rate were used as input variables for prediction. The simulation results revealed a groundwater level decrease since the aquifer withdrawal amount is more than the recharge amount. Besides, results showed that there is a limited interaction between surface water and groundwater resources, mainly caused by the decrease in the river flow and aquifer groundwater level drop. Both ML models performed well in GRI estimation, using groundwater flow, streamflow drought index, standardized precipitation index, and runoff as input variables. The performance of the MARS model with RMSE, MAE, and NSE error evaluation criteria of 0.37, − 0.19, and 0.83, respectively, exerted slightly better results than LSSVR with RMSE, MAE, and NSE of 0.48, − 0.06, and 0.80, respectively. The findings reveal the appropriate performance of both models in forecasting drought indicators, highlighting the necessity of using ML models in hydrology and drought prediction problems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8374,"journal":{"name":"Applied Water Science","volume":"14 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13201-024-02224-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Water Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13201-024-02224-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Examining the condition of groundwater resources and the impact of droughts is valuable for effective water resources management. Today, machine learning (ML) models are recognized as one of the useful tools in time series predictions. In this study, the groundwater condition of one of the most important aquifers in northwest Iran was investigated using MODFLOW, followed by estimating the groundwater resource index (GRI) utilizing the multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS) and least squares support vector regression (LSSVR) for a period between 2001 and 2019. Meteorological and hydrological drought indicators along with precipitation and flow rate were used as input variables for prediction. The simulation results revealed a groundwater level decrease since the aquifer withdrawal amount is more than the recharge amount. Besides, results showed that there is a limited interaction between surface water and groundwater resources, mainly caused by the decrease in the river flow and aquifer groundwater level drop. Both ML models performed well in GRI estimation, using groundwater flow, streamflow drought index, standardized precipitation index, and runoff as input variables. The performance of the MARS model with RMSE, MAE, and NSE error evaluation criteria of 0.37, − 0.19, and 0.83, respectively, exerted slightly better results than LSSVR with RMSE, MAE, and NSE of 0.48, − 0.06, and 0.80, respectively. The findings reveal the appropriate performance of both models in forecasting drought indicators, highlighting the necessity of using ML models in hydrology and drought prediction problems.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估预测全球报告倡议组织(GRI)干旱指标的机器学习模型(案例研究:阿贾布希尔地区
研究地下水资源状况和干旱的影响对于有效管理水资源非常重要。如今,机器学习(ML)模型被认为是时间序列预测的有用工具之一。本研究利用 MODFLOW 对伊朗西北部最重要含水层之一的地下水状况进行了调查,随后利用多元自适应回归样条线(MARS)和最小二乘支持向量回归(LSSVR)对 2001 年至 2019 年期间的地下水资源指数(GRI)进行了估算。气象和水文干旱指标以及降水量和流量被用作预测的输入变量。模拟结果显示,由于含水层的取水量大于补给量,地下水位有所下降。此外,模拟结果表明,地表水和地下水资源之间存在有限的相互作用,主要原因是河流流量减少和含水层地下水位下降。以地下水流量、河水干旱指数、标准化降水指数和径流为输入变量,两个 ML 模型在 GRI 估算中均表现良好。MARS 模型的 RMSE、MAE 和 NSE 误差评价标准分别为 0.37、- 0.19 和 0.83,其性能略优于 LSSVR(RMSE、MAE 和 NSE 分别为 0.48、- 0.06 和 0.80)。研究结果表明,这两种模型在预测干旱指标方面都有适当的表现,突出了在水文和干旱预测问题中使用 ML 模型的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Water Science
Applied Water Science WATER RESOURCES-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Analytical study on 2D groundwater flow in a sloping unconfined aquifer under spatiotemporal recharge Evaluation of ZnO/NiO/kaolin nanocomposite as a sorbent/photocatalyst in hybrid water remediation process Water desalination using atmospheric pressure plasma combined with thermal treatment Studying the kinetic energy budget and moisture transport during a severe case of cyclogenesis Advanced reference crop evapotranspiration prediction: a novel framework combining neural nets, bee optimization algorithm, and mode decomposition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1