Assessing maternity care access: impacts on cesarean sections and dystocia.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1186/s12884-024-06746-y
Soo Hyun Kang, Minah Park, Jong Youn Moon, Suk Young Kim
{"title":"Assessing maternity care access: impacts on cesarean sections and dystocia.","authors":"Soo Hyun Kang, Minah Park, Jong Youn Moon, Suk Young Kim","doi":"10.1186/s12884-024-06746-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As South Korea grapples with a declining birthrate, maternity care accessibility has become challenging. This study examines the association with labour intervention and pregnancy complication, specifically focusing on C-section and dystocia in maternity disparities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the South Korean NHIS-NID was used to analyze 1,437,186 women with childbirths between 2010 and 2015. The research defines 50 specific districts as Obstetrically Underserved Areas produced by the Ministry of Health and Welfare in 2011. C-Section were assessed through using medical procedure and DRG codes, while dystocia was defined using ICD-10 code. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the significance of the association.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the population residing in underserved areas, 42,873 out of a total of 1,437,186 individuals were identified. For nationwide cases, the odds ratios (ORs) for C-Section were 1.11 (95% CI: 1.08-1.13) and dystocia were 1.07 (95% CI: 1.05-1.09). In relatively accessible urban areas, the ORs for C-Section and dystocia, based on whether they were obstetrically underserved areas, were 1.16 (95% CI: 1.13-1.18) and 1.10 (95% CI: 1.08-1.19), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Poor accessibility to maternity care facilities is closely linked to high-risk pregnancies, including an increased incidence of dystocia and a higher rate of C-sections. Insufficient access to maternity care not only raises the risk of serious pregnancy complications. Consequently, there is a pressing need for multi-faceted efforts to bridge this disparity.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11340090/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-024-06746-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As South Korea grapples with a declining birthrate, maternity care accessibility has become challenging. This study examines the association with labour intervention and pregnancy complication, specifically focusing on C-section and dystocia in maternity disparities.

Methods: Data from the South Korean NHIS-NID was used to analyze 1,437,186 women with childbirths between 2010 and 2015. The research defines 50 specific districts as Obstetrically Underserved Areas produced by the Ministry of Health and Welfare in 2011. C-Section were assessed through using medical procedure and DRG codes, while dystocia was defined using ICD-10 code. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the significance of the association.

Results: Among the population residing in underserved areas, 42,873 out of a total of 1,437,186 individuals were identified. For nationwide cases, the odds ratios (ORs) for C-Section were 1.11 (95% CI: 1.08-1.13) and dystocia were 1.07 (95% CI: 1.05-1.09). In relatively accessible urban areas, the ORs for C-Section and dystocia, based on whether they were obstetrically underserved areas, were 1.16 (95% CI: 1.13-1.18) and 1.10 (95% CI: 1.08-1.19), respectively.

Conclusion: Poor accessibility to maternity care facilities is closely linked to high-risk pregnancies, including an increased incidence of dystocia and a higher rate of C-sections. Insufficient access to maternity care not only raises the risk of serious pregnancy complications. Consequently, there is a pressing need for multi-faceted efforts to bridge this disparity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估产妇获得护理的机会:对剖腹产和难产的影响。
背景:韩国正努力应对出生率下降的问题,孕产妇护理的可及性已成为一项挑战。本研究探讨了分娩干预与妊娠并发症的关系,尤其关注剖腹产和难产在孕产妇中的差异:方法:使用韩国 NHIS-NID 的数据,对 2010 年至 2015 年间的 1 437 186 名产妇进行分析。研究将 50 个特定地区定义为保健福祉部 2011 年制定的产科服务不足地区。剖腹产通过医疗程序和 DRG 编码进行评估,而难产则通过 ICD-10 编码进行定义。采用逻辑回归分析来检验相关性:在 1,437,186 人中,有 42,873 人居住在服务不足地区。在全国范围内,剖腹产的几率比(ORs)为 1.11(95% CI:1.08-1.13),难产的几率比(ORs)为 1.07(95% CI:1.05-1.09)。在交通相对便利的城市地区,根据是否属于产科服务不足地区,剖腹产和难产的OR值分别为1.16(95% CI:1.13-1.18)和1.10(95% CI:1.08-1.19):结论:产科护理设施的可及性较差与高危妊娠密切相关,包括难产发生率增加和剖腹产率升高。产科护理服务不足不仅会增加严重妊娠并发症的风险,还会增加产妇的死亡率。因此,迫切需要从多方面努力缩小这一差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
期刊最新文献
Trends and determinants of the use of episiotomy in a prospective population-based registry from central India Management of cervical cancer in pregnancy in a low resource setting: a rare case report Establishment and validation of a predictive model for spontaneous preterm birth in singleton pregnant women COVID testing hesitancy among pregnant patients: lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic about the unique needs and challenges of medically complex populations Letrozole co-treatment in an antagonist protocol for overweight women undergoing IVF treatment: a retrospective study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1