Predicting psoriasis severity using machine learning: A systematic review.

IF 3.7 4区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Clinical and Experimental Dermatology Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1093/ced/llae348
Eric P McMullen, Yousif A Al Naser, Mahan Maazi, Rajan S Grewal, Dana Abdel Hafeez, Tia R Folino, Ronald B Vender
{"title":"Predicting psoriasis severity using machine learning: A systematic review.","authors":"Eric P McMullen, Yousif A Al Naser, Mahan Maazi, Rajan S Grewal, Dana Abdel Hafeez, Tia R Folino, Ronald B Vender","doi":"10.1093/ced/llae348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In dermatology, the applications of machine learning (ML), an artificial intelligence (AI) subset that enables machines to learn from experience, have progressed past the diagnosis and classification of skin lesions. A lack of systematic reviews exists to explore the role of ML in predicting the severity of psoriasis. This systematic review aims to identify and summarize the existing literature on predicting psoriasis severity using ML algorithms and identify gaps in current clinical applications of these tools. OVID Embase, OVID MEDLINE, ACM Digital Library, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore were searched from inception to August, 2024. A total of 30 articles met our inclusion criteria and were included in this review. One article used serum biomarkers, while the remaining 29 used image-based models. The most common severity assessment score employed by these ML models was the Psoriasis Area Severity Index score, followed by Body Surface Area, with fifteen and five articles, respectively. The small size and heterogeneity of the existing literature are the primary limitations of this review. Progress in assessing skin lesion severity through ML in dermatology has advanced, but prospective clinical applications remain limited. ML and AI promise to improve psoriasis management, especially in non-image-based applications requiring further exploration. Large-scale prospective trials using diverse image datasets are necessary to evaluate and predict the clinical value of these predictive AI models.</p>","PeriodicalId":10324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Dermatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ced/llae348","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In dermatology, the applications of machine learning (ML), an artificial intelligence (AI) subset that enables machines to learn from experience, have progressed past the diagnosis and classification of skin lesions. A lack of systematic reviews exists to explore the role of ML in predicting the severity of psoriasis. This systematic review aims to identify and summarize the existing literature on predicting psoriasis severity using ML algorithms and identify gaps in current clinical applications of these tools. OVID Embase, OVID MEDLINE, ACM Digital Library, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore were searched from inception to August, 2024. A total of 30 articles met our inclusion criteria and were included in this review. One article used serum biomarkers, while the remaining 29 used image-based models. The most common severity assessment score employed by these ML models was the Psoriasis Area Severity Index score, followed by Body Surface Area, with fifteen and five articles, respectively. The small size and heterogeneity of the existing literature are the primary limitations of this review. Progress in assessing skin lesion severity through ML in dermatology has advanced, but prospective clinical applications remain limited. ML and AI promise to improve psoriasis management, especially in non-image-based applications requiring further exploration. Large-scale prospective trials using diverse image datasets are necessary to evaluate and predict the clinical value of these predictive AI models.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用机器学习预测牛皮癣严重程度:系统综述。
机器学习(ML)是人工智能(AI)的一个子集,可使机器从经验中学习,在皮肤病学中的应用已超越了皮损的诊断和分类。目前缺乏系统性综述来探讨 ML 在预测银屑病严重程度方面的作用。本系统性综述旨在识别和总结利用 ML 算法预测银屑病严重程度的现有文献,并找出这些工具在当前临床应用中的不足之处。从开始到 2024 年 8 月,我们检索了 OVID Embase、OVID MEDLINE、ACM 数字图书馆、Scopus 和 IEEE Xplore。共有 30 篇文章符合我们的纳入标准并被纳入本综述。其中一篇文章使用了血清生物标记物,其余 29 篇文章使用了基于图像的模型。这些 ML 模型最常用的严重程度评估评分是牛皮癣面积严重程度指数评分,其次是体表面积,分别有 15 篇和 5 篇文章采用。现有文献的篇幅较小和异质性是本综述的主要局限性。在皮肤病学领域,通过 ML 评估皮损严重程度的工作取得了进展,但前瞻性临床应用仍然有限。ML 和人工智能有望改善银屑病的管理,尤其是在非图像应用方面需要进一步探索。有必要使用各种图像数据集进行大规模前瞻性试验,以评估和预测这些预测性人工智能模型的临床价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
2.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Dermatology (CED) is a unique provider of relevant and educational material for practising clinicians and dermatological researchers. We support continuing professional development (CPD) of dermatology specialists to advance the understanding, management and treatment of skin disease in order to improve patient outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Preliminary assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma through deep sequencing of T-cell receptor gamma gene. Protean Cutaneous Manifestation Caused by ABCA12 variants: Erythrokeratodermia Variabilis-like Ichthyosis and Unique Palmoplantar Keratoderma. Basal cell carcinoma of the neo-phallus: an emerging complication of gender reassignment surgery. Anifrolumab use in refractory dermatomyositis: a case report and literature review. Environmental Sustainability in Dermatological Surgery. Part 2: Reducing Activity and Future Ecological Strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1