Development of a core outcome set for maternal and perinatal health research and surveillance in light of emerging and ongoing epidemic threats.

Gates Open Research Pub Date : 2024-08-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/gatesopenres.15136.2
Veronica Pingray, Karen Klein, Juan Pedro Alonso, María Belizan, Gabriella Radice, Magdalena Babinska, Mabel Berrueta, Mercedes Bonet
{"title":"Development of a core outcome set for maternal and perinatal health research and surveillance in light of emerging and ongoing epidemic threats.","authors":"Veronica Pingray, Karen Klein, Juan Pedro Alonso, María Belizan, Gabriella Radice, Magdalena Babinska, Mabel Berrueta, Mercedes Bonet","doi":"10.12688/gatesopenres.15136.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Maternal and perinatal health is often directly and indirectly affected during infectious disease epidemics. Yet, a lack of evidence on epidemics' impact on women and their offspring delays informed decision-making for healthcare providers, pregnant women, women in the post-pregnancy period and policy-makers. To rapidly generate evidence in these circumstances, we aim to develop a Core Outcome Set (COS) for maternal and perinatal health research and surveillance in light of emerging and ongoing epidemic threats.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We will conduct a Systematic Review and a four-stage modified Delphi expert consensus. The systematic literature will aim to inform experts on outcomes reported in maternal and perinatal research and surveillance during previous epidemics. The expert consensus will involve two individual, anonymous online surveys to rate outcomes' importance and suggest new ones, one virtual meeting to discuss disagreements, and one in-person meeting to agree on the final COS, outcomes definitions and measurement methods. Four panels will be established to participate in the modified Delphi with expertise in (a) maternal and perinatal health, (b) neonatal health, (c) public health and emergency response, and (d) representation of civil society. We will recruit at least 20 international experts for each stakeholder group, with diverse backgrounds and gender, professional, and geographic balance. Only highly-rated outcomes (with at least 80% of ratings being 7-9 on a 9-point Likert scale) and no more than 10% of low ratings (1-3) will be included in the final COS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing this COS in future maternal and perinatal research and surveillance, especially in the context of emerging and ongoing epidemic threats, will facilitate the rapid and systematic generation of evidence. It will also enhance the ability of policy-makers, healthcare providers, pregnant women and women in the post-pregnancy period and their families to make well-informed choices in challenging circumstances.</p>","PeriodicalId":12593,"journal":{"name":"Gates Open Research","volume":"8 ","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11339271/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gates Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.15136.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Maternal and perinatal health is often directly and indirectly affected during infectious disease epidemics. Yet, a lack of evidence on epidemics' impact on women and their offspring delays informed decision-making for healthcare providers, pregnant women, women in the post-pregnancy period and policy-makers. To rapidly generate evidence in these circumstances, we aim to develop a Core Outcome Set (COS) for maternal and perinatal health research and surveillance in light of emerging and ongoing epidemic threats.

Methods: We will conduct a Systematic Review and a four-stage modified Delphi expert consensus. The systematic literature will aim to inform experts on outcomes reported in maternal and perinatal research and surveillance during previous epidemics. The expert consensus will involve two individual, anonymous online surveys to rate outcomes' importance and suggest new ones, one virtual meeting to discuss disagreements, and one in-person meeting to agree on the final COS, outcomes definitions and measurement methods. Four panels will be established to participate in the modified Delphi with expertise in (a) maternal and perinatal health, (b) neonatal health, (c) public health and emergency response, and (d) representation of civil society. We will recruit at least 20 international experts for each stakeholder group, with diverse backgrounds and gender, professional, and geographic balance. Only highly-rated outcomes (with at least 80% of ratings being 7-9 on a 9-point Likert scale) and no more than 10% of low ratings (1-3) will be included in the final COS.

Conclusions: Implementing this COS in future maternal and perinatal research and surveillance, especially in the context of emerging and ongoing epidemic threats, will facilitate the rapid and systematic generation of evidence. It will also enhance the ability of policy-makers, healthcare providers, pregnant women and women in the post-pregnancy period and their families to make well-informed choices in challenging circumstances.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据新出现的和正在发生的流行病威胁,为孕产妇和围产期健康研究和监测制定一套核心成果。
背景:在传染病流行期间,孕产妇和围产期健康往往会受到直接或间接的影响。然而,由于缺乏流行病对妇女及其后代影响的证据,医疗服务提供者、孕妇、孕产妇和政策制定者无法做出明智的决策。为了在这种情况下快速生成证据,我们旨在根据新出现的和正在发生的流行病威胁,为孕产妇和围产期健康研究和监测开发一套核心结果集(COS):方法:我们将进行系统性回顾和四阶段改良德尔菲专家共识。系统性文献旨在向专家们介绍以往流行病期间孕产妇和围产期研究与监测所报告的结果。专家共识将包括两次个人匿名在线调查,以评定结果的重要性并提出新的建议;一次虚拟会议,以讨论分歧;一次现场会议,以商定最终的 COS、结果定义和测量方法。我们将成立四个小组来参与修改后的德尔菲法,这些小组的专业领域包括:(a) 孕产妇和围产期保健;(b) 新生儿保健;(c) 公共卫生和应急响应;(d) 民间社会代表。我们将为每个利益相关者小组招募至少 20 名国际专家,这些专家应具有不同的背景,并在性别、专业和地域方面保持平衡。最终的 COS 将只包括高分结果(在 9 分的李克特量表中,至少 80% 的评分为 7-9 分)和不超过 10% 的低分结果(1-3 分):结论:在今后的孕产妇和围产期研究与监测工作中,尤其是在新出现的和正在发生的流行病威胁背景下,采用这种 COS 将有助于快速、系统地生成证据。它还将提高政策制定者、医疗服务提供者、孕妇和孕后妇女及其家人在具有挑战性的情况下做出明智选择的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gates Open Research
Gates Open Research Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology and Microbiology (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
期刊最新文献
Developing a framework for understanding policy decision-making behaviors in the transition of an HIV prevention program towards sustainability: a case study from Zambia's voluntary medical male circumcision program. Knowledge and uptake of contraceptive and other sexual reproductive health services among in-school adolescents in three South African townships: Baseline findings from the Girls Achieve Power (GAP Year) Trial. Using models and maps to inform Target Product Profiles and Preferred Product Characteristics: the example of Wolbachia replacement. Vaccine decision-making among pregnant women: a protocol for a cross-sectional mixed-method study in Brazil, Ghana, Kenya and Pakistan. Simulated data for census-scale entity resolution research without privacy restrictions: a large-scale dataset generated by individual-based modeling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1