Discordant Treatment Goals for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Clinical Trials Metrics.

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS JACC. Clinical electrophysiology Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1016/j.jacep.2024.06.026
Brian Zenger, John A Spertus, Michael Torre, Ann Lyons, T Jared Bunch, Rachel Hess, Yue Zhang, Jonathan P Piccini, Morgan M Millar, Trudie Lobban, Benjamin A Steinberg
{"title":"Discordant Treatment Goals for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Clinical Trials Metrics.","authors":"Brian Zenger, John A Spertus, Michael Torre, Ann Lyons, T Jared Bunch, Rachel Hess, Yue Zhang, Jonathan P Piccini, Morgan M Millar, Trudie Lobban, Benjamin A Steinberg","doi":"10.1016/j.jacep.2024.06.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most clinical trials define successful atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment as no AF episodes longer than 30 seconds. Yet, there has been minimal study of how patients define successful treatment and whether their perspectives align with trial outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Survey patients with AF to identify: 1) what aspect of AF is most important to address (frequency, duration, or severity of AF episodes); 2) what AF burden would be considered acceptable to consider treatment successful; and 3) to establish patient preferences for successful treatment thresholds for a validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) score.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed patients receiving active care for AF at a single tertiary care center modeled after the Toronto AF Severity Scale (AFSS). The survey consisted of current and \"successful treatment\" AF frequency, burden, and symptom domains; and baseline socioeconomic information.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 7,000 invitations, 852 individuals completed the survey (12% response) with a mean age of 65 ± 13 years, 36.5% were female, and they had a mean CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VAsc score of 2.9 ± 1.9. Overall, 114 (13%) selected a decrease in AF episode duration as their top treatment priority, 505 (59%) episode frequency, and 230 (27%) episode severity. Overall, 207 (24%) patients would only consider a treatment successful if they never had AF again, whereas 645 (76%) patients considered success to be fewer AF episodes. A total of 341 (40%) patients would only consider a treatment successful if AF episodes lasted less than a few minutes, whereas 509 (60%) patients would accept AF episodes lasting >30 minutes. An AFSS symptom score ≤5 was considered a good outcome by 80% of respondents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients prioritize decreased AF frequency over improvements in severity or duration, and an AFSS ≤5 would be a reasonable outcome of AF treatment. Most patients would consider treatment successful if they had more than 1 AF episode lasting longer than 30 seconds. Future clinical trial design should consider patients' perspectives when designing outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14573,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2024.06.026","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Most clinical trials define successful atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment as no AF episodes longer than 30 seconds. Yet, there has been minimal study of how patients define successful treatment and whether their perspectives align with trial outcomes.

Objectives: Survey patients with AF to identify: 1) what aspect of AF is most important to address (frequency, duration, or severity of AF episodes); 2) what AF burden would be considered acceptable to consider treatment successful; and 3) to establish patient preferences for successful treatment thresholds for a validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) score.

Methods: We surveyed patients receiving active care for AF at a single tertiary care center modeled after the Toronto AF Severity Scale (AFSS). The survey consisted of current and "successful treatment" AF frequency, burden, and symptom domains; and baseline socioeconomic information.

Results: Of 7,000 invitations, 852 individuals completed the survey (12% response) with a mean age of 65 ± 13 years, 36.5% were female, and they had a mean CHA2DS2-VAsc score of 2.9 ± 1.9. Overall, 114 (13%) selected a decrease in AF episode duration as their top treatment priority, 505 (59%) episode frequency, and 230 (27%) episode severity. Overall, 207 (24%) patients would only consider a treatment successful if they never had AF again, whereas 645 (76%) patients considered success to be fewer AF episodes. A total of 341 (40%) patients would only consider a treatment successful if AF episodes lasted less than a few minutes, whereas 509 (60%) patients would accept AF episodes lasting >30 minutes. An AFSS symptom score ≤5 was considered a good outcome by 80% of respondents.

Conclusions: Patients prioritize decreased AF frequency over improvements in severity or duration, and an AFSS ≤5 would be a reasonable outcome of AF treatment. Most patients would consider treatment successful if they had more than 1 AF episode lasting longer than 30 seconds. Future clinical trial design should consider patients' perspectives when designing outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心房颤动患者不一致的治疗目标与临床试验指标。
背景:大多数临床试验将成功的房颤治疗定义为房颤发作不超过 30 秒。然而,关于患者如何定义成功治疗以及他们的观点是否与试验结果一致的研究却很少:调查房颤患者,以确定目标:调查房颤患者,确定:1)房颤最需要解决的方面(房颤发作的频率、持续时间或严重程度);2)可接受的房颤负担是多少,才能认为治疗成功;3)确定患者对成功治疗阈值的偏好,以进行有效的患者报告结果(PRO)评分:我们以多伦多房颤严重程度量表(AFSS)为模型,对在一家三级医疗中心接受房颤积极治疗的患者进行了调查。调查内容包括当前和 "成功治疗 "房颤的频率、负担和症状领域,以及基线社会经济信息:在 7000 份邀请函中,852 人完成了调查(回复率为 12%),平均年龄为 65 ± 13 岁,36.5% 为女性,平均 CHA2DS2-VAsc 得分为 2.9 ± 1.9。总体而言,有 114 人(13%)将减少房颤发作持续时间作为首要治疗目标,505 人(59%)将减少发作频率作为首要治疗目标,230 人(27%)将减少发作严重程度作为首要治疗目标。总体而言,207 名(24%)患者认为只有当房颤不再发作时治疗才算成功,而 645 名(76%)患者则认为房颤发作次数减少才算成功。共有 341 名(40%)患者认为只有房颤发作持续时间少于几分钟的治疗才算成功,而 509 名(60%)患者则接受房颤发作持续时间大于 30 分钟的治疗。80%的受访者认为 AFSS 症状评分≤5 为良好结果:患者优先考虑的是降低房颤频率,而不是改善严重程度或持续时间,AFSS 评分≤5 分是房颤治疗的合理结果。如果房颤发作超过一次,持续时间超过 30 秒,大多数患者会认为治疗是成功的。未来的临床试验设计在设计结果时应考虑患者的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JACC. Clinical electrophysiology
JACC. Clinical electrophysiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology is one of a family of specialist journals launched by the renowned Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC). It encompasses all aspects of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. Submissions of original research and state-of-the-art reviews from cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, neurology, outcomes research, and related fields are encouraged. Experimental and preclinical work that directly relates to diagnostic or therapeutic interventions are also encouraged. In general, case reports will not be considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Atrial Fibrillation Burden on a 14-Day ECG Monitor: Findings From the GUARD-AF Trial Screening Arm Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Rare Pathogenic Variants in Cardiomyopathy and Arrhythmia Genes. The Diagnostic Utility of Holter Monitoring in Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia. Standard Defibrillator Leads for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing: First-in-Man Experience and Short-Term Follow-Up. Triple Transition Sign in Simultaneous Bilateral Bundle Branch Capture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1