Sensor-Head Distance and Signal Strength in Whole-Head Magnetoencephalography: Report of 996 Patients With Epilepsy.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1097/WNP.0000000000001114
Naoaki Tanaka, Seppo P Ahlfors, Steven M Stufflebeam
{"title":"Sensor-Head Distance and Signal Strength in Whole-Head Magnetoencephalography: Report of 996 Patients With Epilepsy.","authors":"Naoaki Tanaka, Seppo P Ahlfors, Steven M Stufflebeam","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000001114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although the sensor-to-head distance is theoretically known to affect the signal strength in magnetoencephalography (MEG), these values have not been reported for a whole-head MEG system in a large population. We measured the distance and signal strength in 996 patients with epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The MEG sensor array consisted of 102 measurement sites, each of which had two gradiometers and one magnetometer. The sensor-head distance was defined as the minimum distance between each site and a set of digitized scalp points. For the signal strength, we calculated the root-mean-square of the signal values in each sensor over a recording of 4 minutes. For analyses at the individual and sensor levels, these values were averaged over the sensors and patients, respectively. We evaluated the correlation between distance and signal strength at both individual and sensor levels. At the sensor level, we investigated regional differences in these measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The individual-level analysis showed only a weak negative correlation between the sensor-head distance and the signal strength. The sensor-level analysis demonstrated a considerably negative correlation for both gradiometers and magnetometers. The sensor-head distances showed no significant differences between the regions, whereas the signal strength was higher in the temporal and occipital sensors than in the frontal and parietal sensors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sensor-head distance was not a definitive factor for determining the magnitude of MEG signals in individuals. Yet, the distance is important for the signal strength at a sensor level. Regional differences in signal strength may need to be considered in the analysis and interpretation of MEG.</p>","PeriodicalId":15516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"208-214"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000001114","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Although the sensor-to-head distance is theoretically known to affect the signal strength in magnetoencephalography (MEG), these values have not been reported for a whole-head MEG system in a large population. We measured the distance and signal strength in 996 patients with epilepsy.

Methods: The MEG sensor array consisted of 102 measurement sites, each of which had two gradiometers and one magnetometer. The sensor-head distance was defined as the minimum distance between each site and a set of digitized scalp points. For the signal strength, we calculated the root-mean-square of the signal values in each sensor over a recording of 4 minutes. For analyses at the individual and sensor levels, these values were averaged over the sensors and patients, respectively. We evaluated the correlation between distance and signal strength at both individual and sensor levels. At the sensor level, we investigated regional differences in these measures.

Results: The individual-level analysis showed only a weak negative correlation between the sensor-head distance and the signal strength. The sensor-level analysis demonstrated a considerably negative correlation for both gradiometers and magnetometers. The sensor-head distances showed no significant differences between the regions, whereas the signal strength was higher in the temporal and occipital sensors than in the frontal and parietal sensors.

Conclusions: Sensor-head distance was not a definitive factor for determining the magnitude of MEG signals in individuals. Yet, the distance is important for the signal strength at a sensor level. Regional differences in signal strength may need to be considered in the analysis and interpretation of MEG.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全头脑磁图中传感器与头部的距离和信号强度:996名癫痫患者的报告。
目的:虽然从理论上讲,传感器到头部的距离会影响脑磁图(MEG)的信号强度,但这些数值尚未在大量人群中的全头部脑磁图系统中报道过。我们测量了 996 名癫痫患者的距离和信号强度:MEG 传感器阵列由 102 个测量点组成,每个测量点有两个梯度仪和一个磁强计。传感器与头的距离定义为每个测量点与一组数字化头皮点之间的最小距离。对于信号强度,我们计算了每个传感器在 4 分钟记录中信号值的均方根。对于个人和传感器层面的分析,这些值分别是传感器和患者的平均值。我们从个体和传感器两个层面评估了距离和信号强度之间的相关性。在传感器层面,我们研究了这些指标的地区差异:个人层面的分析表明,传感器与头部的距离与信号强度之间只有微弱的负相关。传感器层面的分析表明,梯度仪和磁强计之间存在明显的负相关。不同区域的传感器头距没有明显差异,但颞部和枕部传感器的信号强度高于额部和顶叶传感器:结论:传感器头的距离并不是决定个体脑电信号大小的决定性因素。然而,距离对传感器层面的信号强度非常重要。在分析和解释 MEG 时,可能需要考虑信号强度的区域差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
198
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology features both topical reviews and original research in both central and peripheral neurophysiology, as related to patient evaluation and treatment. Official Journal of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society.
期刊最新文献
Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Tethered Cord Syndrome Surgery: Predictive Values and Clinical Outcome. Direct (D)-Wave Monitoring Enhancement With Subdural Electrode Placement: A Case Series. Survey of Continuous EEG Monitoring Practices in the United States. A Proposed Stereoelectroencephalography Electrode Nomenclature and Call for Standardization. The Fingerprint of Scalp-EEG in Drug-Resistant Frontal Lobe Epilepsies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1