Identifying Three Psilocybin Use Patterns by Frequency and Quantity.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.15288/jsad.23-00312
Bethany A Gray, Olivia L Bolts, Deborah Fidler, Mark Prince
{"title":"Identifying Three Psilocybin Use Patterns by Frequency and Quantity.","authors":"Bethany A Gray, Olivia L Bolts, Deborah Fidler, Mark Prince","doi":"10.15288/jsad.23-00312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patterns of psilocybin use in non-clinical settings are not well described in the literature. Psilocybin use can involve infrequent, large (i.e., macro) doses that produce hallucinogenic effects. In addition, some people report psilocybin use at particularly small (i.e., micro), sub-perceptual doses. Given the heterogeneity in reported use metrics, we sought to determine whether there are identifiable patterns of psilocybin use based on participants' self-described typical use frequencies and quantities and to describe how demographic characteristics are associated with each pattern of use.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were recruited from online communities via Reddit.com. We used Latent Profile Analysis to discern psilocybin use patterns defined by frequency and quantity of use. The analytic sample consisted of 664 participants (75.6% US residents; 83.1% white; 67.2% male).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Chipper Profile (18%) was associated with approximately 1-4 annual uses and using between 0.75g and 1.0g of dehydrated, psilocybin-containing mushrooms. The Tripper Profile (64%) was associated with approximately 2-6 annual uses and self-reported use quantities between 2-4g. The Microdoser Profile (18%) was related to substantively higher psilocybin use frequencies than the other profiles (between 2-4 times a week) and a lower range of preferred quantities (between 0.25g - 0.75g). Additionally, profiles differed by certain demographic measurements, lifetime psilocybin use, and timing of psilocybin use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Psilocybin use in non-clinical settings is heterogeneous. We identified three profiles that differed on frequency and quantity of use and their associated demographic characteristics. Next steps are to identify factors that affect one's likelihood of experiencing particular use outcomes and to explore use variability.</p>","PeriodicalId":17159,"journal":{"name":"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.23-00312","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Patterns of psilocybin use in non-clinical settings are not well described in the literature. Psilocybin use can involve infrequent, large (i.e., macro) doses that produce hallucinogenic effects. In addition, some people report psilocybin use at particularly small (i.e., micro), sub-perceptual doses. Given the heterogeneity in reported use metrics, we sought to determine whether there are identifiable patterns of psilocybin use based on participants' self-described typical use frequencies and quantities and to describe how demographic characteristics are associated with each pattern of use.

Method: Participants were recruited from online communities via Reddit.com. We used Latent Profile Analysis to discern psilocybin use patterns defined by frequency and quantity of use. The analytic sample consisted of 664 participants (75.6% US residents; 83.1% white; 67.2% male).

Results: The Chipper Profile (18%) was associated with approximately 1-4 annual uses and using between 0.75g and 1.0g of dehydrated, psilocybin-containing mushrooms. The Tripper Profile (64%) was associated with approximately 2-6 annual uses and self-reported use quantities between 2-4g. The Microdoser Profile (18%) was related to substantively higher psilocybin use frequencies than the other profiles (between 2-4 times a week) and a lower range of preferred quantities (between 0.25g - 0.75g). Additionally, profiles differed by certain demographic measurements, lifetime psilocybin use, and timing of psilocybin use.

Conclusions: Psilocybin use in non-clinical settings is heterogeneous. We identified three profiles that differed on frequency and quantity of use and their associated demographic characteristics. Next steps are to identify factors that affect one's likelihood of experiencing particular use outcomes and to explore use variability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过频率和数量识别三种迷幻药使用模式。
目的:文献中对在非临床环境中使用迷幻剂的模式没有很好的描述。使用迷幻剂可能会产生不频繁的、大剂量(即大剂量)的致幻效果。此外,有些人报告使用的迷幻药剂量特别小(即微量),达到感知剂量以下。鉴于报告的使用指标存在差异,我们试图根据参与者自述的典型使用频率和数量,确定是否存在可识别的迷幻剂使用模式,并描述人口统计学特征与每种使用模式的关联:我们通过 Reddit.com 从网络社区招募参与者。我们使用潜特征分析法来辨别根据使用频率和数量定义的迷幻药使用模式。分析样本包括 664 名参与者(75.6% 为美国居民;83.1% 为白人;67.2% 为男性):削片者特征(18%)每年大约使用 1-4 次,使用 0.75 克到 1.0 克脱水的含迷幻剂的蘑菇。狩猎者特征(64%)与每年大约使用 2-6 次和自我报告的使用量在 2-4 克之间有关。微量吸食者特征(18%)与使用西洛赛宾的频率(每周 2-4 次之间)和较低的偏好使用量(0.25 克 - 0.75 克之间)有关,远高于其他特征。此外,在某些人口统计学测量、终生使用迷幻剂和使用迷幻剂的时间上,这些特征也有所不同:结论:在非临床环境中使用迷幻剂的情况各不相同。我们发现了使用频率和数量及其相关人口特征不同的三种情况。下一步将确定影响特定使用结果的因素,并探索使用的可变性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs began in 1940 as the Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol. It was founded by Howard W. Haggard, M.D., director of Yale University’s Laboratory of Applied Physiology. Dr. Haggard was a physiologist studying the effects of alcohol on the body, and he started the Journal as a way to publish the increasing amount of research on alcohol use, abuse, and treatment that emerged from Yale and other institutions in the years following the repeal of Prohibition in 1933. In addition to original research, the Journal also published abstracts summarizing other published documents dealing with alcohol. At Yale, Dr. Haggard built a large team of alcohol researchers within the Laboratory of Applied Physiology—including E.M. Jellinek, who became managing editor of the Journal in 1941. In 1943, to bring together the various alcohol research projects conducted by the Laboratory, Dr. Haggard formed the Section of Studies on Alcohol, which also became home to the Journal and its editorial staff. In 1950, the Section was renamed the Center of Alcohol Studies.
期刊最新文献
Risk Factors for Consensual and Coercive Sexual Hookup Behaviors among College Men: A Daily Diary Study. Harms from others' drinking and key indicators of the college experience in the United States. Interactive Effects of Anger and Alcohol Intoxication on Men's Laboratory-Based Sexual Aggression Propensity Following a Masculinity Threat. Measurement equivalence of the Marijuana Effect Expectancies Questionnaire-Brief across sex, race/ethnicity, and their co-occurring social identities for Black, Latinx, and non-Latinx white youth in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study. Cannabis and alcohol enforcement strategies across the U.S.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1