Tissue morphometric measurements do not predict survival following colorectal cancer surgery.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY World Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1186/s12957-024-03496-1
Krishanth Naidu, Pierre H Chapuis, Charles Chan, Matthew J F X Rickard, Nicholas P West, David G Jayne, Kheng-Seong Ng
{"title":"Tissue morphometric measurements do not predict survival following colorectal cancer surgery.","authors":"Krishanth Naidu, Pierre H Chapuis, Charles Chan, Matthew J F X Rickard, Nicholas P West, David G Jayne, Kheng-Seong Ng","doi":"10.1186/s12957-024-03496-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ex vivo tissue morphometric (TM) measurements have been proposed as a quality marker for colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. However, their survival associations require clarification. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of capturing TM measurements based on ex vivo fresh specimen images and explore the association between these TM measurements and survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study at Concord Hospital, Sydney was conducted with Stage I to III CRC patients (2009-2019) who underwent an anterior resection (AR) or right hemicolectomy (RH). Using high-resolution digital photographs of fresh CRC specimens, ex vivo tissue morphometric (TM) measurements-resected mesentery area (TM A), distances from high vascular tie to tumour (TM B) and bowel wall (TM C), and bowel length (TM D)-were recorded using Image J. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) estimates and their associations to clinicopathological variables were investigated with Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. Linear regression models tested association between TM measurements and lymph node (LN) yield.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1,425 patients who underwent CRC surgery, TM measurements were performed on 312 patients, with an average age of 69.4 years (SD 12.3), of whom 52.9% were male. The majority had an AR (57.8%). Among AR patients, a 5-year OS rate of 77.4% and a DFS rate of 70.1% were observed, with TM measurements bearing no relationship to survival outcomes. Similarly, RH patients exhibited a 5-year OS rate of 67.2% and a DFS rate of 63.1%, with TM measurements again showing no association with survival. Only TM D (P = 0.02) measurements were associated with the number of LNs examined.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study successfully demonstrates the feasibility of measuring TM measurements on photographs of ex vivo fresh specimens following CRC surgery. The lack of association with survival outcomes questions the utility of TM measurements as a quality metric of CRC surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":23856,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11340191/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-024-03496-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ex vivo tissue morphometric (TM) measurements have been proposed as a quality marker for colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. However, their survival associations require clarification. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of capturing TM measurements based on ex vivo fresh specimen images and explore the association between these TM measurements and survival outcomes.

Methods: A prospective cohort study at Concord Hospital, Sydney was conducted with Stage I to III CRC patients (2009-2019) who underwent an anterior resection (AR) or right hemicolectomy (RH). Using high-resolution digital photographs of fresh CRC specimens, ex vivo tissue morphometric (TM) measurements-resected mesentery area (TM A), distances from high vascular tie to tumour (TM B) and bowel wall (TM C), and bowel length (TM D)-were recorded using Image J. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) estimates and their associations to clinicopathological variables were investigated with Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. Linear regression models tested association between TM measurements and lymph node (LN) yield.

Results: Of the 1,425 patients who underwent CRC surgery, TM measurements were performed on 312 patients, with an average age of 69.4 years (SD 12.3), of whom 52.9% were male. The majority had an AR (57.8%). Among AR patients, a 5-year OS rate of 77.4% and a DFS rate of 70.1% were observed, with TM measurements bearing no relationship to survival outcomes. Similarly, RH patients exhibited a 5-year OS rate of 67.2% and a DFS rate of 63.1%, with TM measurements again showing no association with survival. Only TM D (P = 0.02) measurements were associated with the number of LNs examined.

Conclusion: This study successfully demonstrates the feasibility of measuring TM measurements on photographs of ex vivo fresh specimens following CRC surgery. The lack of association with survival outcomes questions the utility of TM measurements as a quality metric of CRC surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织形态测量不能预测结直肠癌手术后的存活率。
背景:体内组织形态测量(TM)已被提议作为结直肠癌(CRC)手术的质量标记。然而,其与存活率之间的关系尚需澄清。本研究旨在评估根据体外新鲜标本图像采集组织形态测量值的可行性,并探讨这些组织形态测量值与生存结果之间的关联:悉尼协和医院对接受前切除术(AR)或右半结肠切除术(RH)的 I 至 III 期 CRC 患者(2009-2019 年)进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。使用Image J记录了新鲜CRC标本的高分辨率数字照片、体外组织形态计量(TM)测量值--切除肠系膜面积(TM A)、高血管结扎到肿瘤的距离(TM B)和肠壁(TM C)以及肠长(TM D)。线性回归模型检验了TM测量值与淋巴结(LN)产量之间的关联:在 1425 名接受 CRC 手术的患者中,对 312 名患者进行了 TM 测量,平均年龄为 69.4 岁(SD 12.3),其中 52.9% 为男性。大多数患者有 AR(57.8%)。在 AR 患者中,5 年 OS 率为 77.4%,DFS 率为 70.1%,TM 测量结果与生存结果无关。同样,RH 患者的 5 年 OS 率为 67.2%,DFS 率为 63.1%,TM 测量结果也与生存率无关。只有TM D(P = 0.02)测量值与检查的LN数量有关:本研究成功证明了在 CRC 手术后的活体新鲜标本照片上测量 TM 测量值的可行性。TM测量值与存活结果无关,这就质疑了TM测量值作为CRC手术质量指标的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.60%
发文量
362
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgical Oncology publishes articles related to surgical oncology and its allied subjects, such as epidemiology, cancer research, biomarkers, prevention, pathology, radiology, cancer treatment, clinical trials, multimodality treatment and molecular biology. Emphasis is placed on original research articles. The journal also publishes significant clinical case reports, as well as balanced and timely reviews on selected topics. Oncology is a multidisciplinary super-speciality of which surgical oncology forms an integral component, especially with solid tumors. Surgical oncologists around the world are involved in research extending from detecting the mechanisms underlying the causation of cancer, to its treatment and prevention. The role of a surgical oncologist extends across the whole continuum of care. With continued developments in diagnosis and treatment, the role of a surgical oncologist is ever-changing. Hence, World Journal of Surgical Oncology aims to keep readers abreast with latest developments that will ultimately influence the work of surgical oncologists.
期刊最新文献
Prophylactic para-aortic lymph node dissection in Colo-rectal cancer; pilot study Association of CYP7B1 expression with the prognosis of endometrial cancer: a retrospective study Correction: The therapeutic effect of radiotherapy combined with systemic therapy compared to radiotherapy alone in patients with simple brain metastasis after first-line treatment of limited-stage small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study Clinicopathological characteristics and survival analysis of different molecular subtypes of breast invasive ductal carcinoma achieving pathological complete response through neoadjuvant chemotherapy Survival in medullary thyroid carcinoma patients who fail to achieve a biochemical cure: implications of postoperative 1-month calcitonin levels and targeted therapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1