Consensus palliative care referral criteria for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

IF 9 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Thorax Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1136/thorax-2024-221721
Jennifer Philip, Yuchieh Kathryn Chang, Anna Collins, Natasha Smallwood, Donald Richard Sullivan, Barbara P Yawn, Richard Mularski, Magnus Ekström, Ian A Yang, Christine F McDonald, Masanori Mori, Pedro Perez-Cruz, David M G Halpin, Shao-Yi Cheng, David Hui
{"title":"Consensus palliative care referral criteria for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.","authors":"Jennifer Philip, Yuchieh Kathryn Chang, Anna Collins, Natasha Smallwood, Donald Richard Sullivan, Barbara P Yawn, Richard Mularski, Magnus Ekström, Ian A Yang, Christine F McDonald, Masanori Mori, Pedro Perez-Cruz, David M G Halpin, Shao-Yi Cheng, David Hui","doi":"10.1136/thorax-2024-221721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>People with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have substantial palliative care needs, but uncertainty exists around appropriate identification of patients for palliative care referral.We conducted a Delphi study of international experts to identify consensus referral criteria for specialist outpatient palliative care for people with COPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinicians in the fields of respiratory medicine, palliative and primary care from five continents with expertise in respiratory medicine and palliative care rated 81 criteria over three Delphi rounds. Consensus was defined a priori as ≥70% agreement. A criterion was considered 'major' if experts endorsed meeting that criterion alone justified palliative care referral.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Response rates from the 57 panellists were 86% (49), 84% (48) and 91% (52) over first, second and third rounds, respectively. Panellists reached consensus on 17 major criteria for specialist outpatient palliative care referral, categorised under: (1) 'Health service use and need for advanced respiratory therapies' (six criteria, eg, need for home non-invasive ventilation); (2) 'Presence of symptoms, psychosocial and decision-making needs' (eight criteria, eg, severe (7-10 on a 10 point scale) chronic breathlessness); and (3) 'Prognostic estimate and performance status' (three criteria, eg, physician-estimated life expectancy of 6 months or less).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>International experts evaluated 81 potential referral criteria, reaching consensus on 17 major criteria for referral to specialist outpatient palliative care for people with COPD. Evaluation of the feasibility of these criteria in practice is required to improve standardised palliative care delivery for people with COPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":23284,"journal":{"name":"Thorax","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thorax","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2024-221721","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: People with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have substantial palliative care needs, but uncertainty exists around appropriate identification of patients for palliative care referral.We conducted a Delphi study of international experts to identify consensus referral criteria for specialist outpatient palliative care for people with COPD.

Methods: Clinicians in the fields of respiratory medicine, palliative and primary care from five continents with expertise in respiratory medicine and palliative care rated 81 criteria over three Delphi rounds. Consensus was defined a priori as ≥70% agreement. A criterion was considered 'major' if experts endorsed meeting that criterion alone justified palliative care referral.

Results: Response rates from the 57 panellists were 86% (49), 84% (48) and 91% (52) over first, second and third rounds, respectively. Panellists reached consensus on 17 major criteria for specialist outpatient palliative care referral, categorised under: (1) 'Health service use and need for advanced respiratory therapies' (six criteria, eg, need for home non-invasive ventilation); (2) 'Presence of symptoms, psychosocial and decision-making needs' (eight criteria, eg, severe (7-10 on a 10 point scale) chronic breathlessness); and (3) 'Prognostic estimate and performance status' (three criteria, eg, physician-estimated life expectancy of 6 months or less).

Conclusions: International experts evaluated 81 potential referral criteria, reaching consensus on 17 major criteria for referral to specialist outpatient palliative care for people with COPD. Evaluation of the feasibility of these criteria in practice is required to improve standardised palliative care delivery for people with COPD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性阻塞性肺病患者姑息关怀转诊标准共识。
目的:晚期慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者有大量的姑息关怀需求,但对姑息关怀转诊患者的适当识别存在不确定性。我们对国际专家进行了德尔菲研究,以确定慢性阻塞性肺病患者专科门诊姑息关怀的共识转诊标准:来自五大洲的呼吸内科、姑息治疗和基础医疗领域的临床医生在三轮德尔菲研究中对 81 项标准进行了评定。共识的先验定义是≥70%的一致意见。如果专家们赞同仅满足该标准就可作为姑息关怀转诊的理由,则该标准被视为 "主要 "标准:57名专家组成员在第一轮、第二轮和第三轮的回复率分别为86%(49人)、84%(48人)和91%(52人)。专家组成员就专科门诊姑息治疗转诊的 17 项主要标准达成了共识,这些标准分为:(1)"医疗服务使用情况和对先进呼吸疗法的需求"(6 项标准,如需要家庭无创通气);(2)"症状、社会心理和决策需求的存在"(8 项标准,如严重(10 分制中的 7-10 分)慢性呼吸困难);(3)"预后估计和表现状态"(3 项标准,如医生估计的预期寿命为 6 个月或更短)。最后得出结论:国际专家评估了 81 项潜在的转诊标准,就 17 项主要标准达成了共识,这些标准适用于慢性阻塞性肺病患者转诊至姑息关怀专科门诊。需要对这些标准在实践中的可行性进行评估,以改进为慢性阻塞性肺病患者提供的标准化姑息关怀服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Thorax
Thorax 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
197
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Thorax stands as one of the premier respiratory medicine journals globally, featuring clinical and experimental research articles spanning respiratory medicine, pediatrics, immunology, pharmacology, pathology, and surgery. The journal's mission is to publish noteworthy advancements in scientific understanding that are poised to influence clinical practice significantly. This encompasses articles delving into basic and translational mechanisms applicable to clinical material, covering areas such as cell and molecular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and immunology.
期刊最新文献
Journal club Harm from tobacco: a common thread Pulmonary fibrosis and lung cancer: an analysis of the Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to the National Cancer Registration Dataset Journal club Consolidation with pseudocavitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1