A survey on the perceptions of midwives, women, and support persons on the introduction of a support person information resource.

IF 1.5 Q3 NURSING European Journal of Midwifery Pub Date : 2024-08-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.18332/ejm/191162
Virginia Stulz, Dorothy Dunham, Tara Farrugia, Nicola Drayton
{"title":"A survey on the perceptions of midwives, women, and support persons on the introduction of a support person information resource.","authors":"Virginia Stulz, Dorothy Dunham, Tara Farrugia, Nicola Drayton","doi":"10.18332/ejm/191162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Midwives in an Australian birth unit undertook a project to develop a resource for women and their support person. The aim of this study was to explore how the women, support persons and midwives viewed the introduction of this resource designed to guide and support women in their choice of support person.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative survey study was used to explore how three participant groups viewed the introduction of a support person information resource. A hospital designed survey was developed for women, support people and midwives. Data were analyzed using SPSS, version 26 and Braun and Clarke's guide for thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More than half (55%) of the midwives believed that the information resource presented influenced women's choice of support people during labor. Almost three-quarters (72%) of the women did not change their choice of number of support people that they wanted during their labor. The majority (83%) of women would recommend the support person brochure to other women. The majority (83%) of support people stayed the entire duration of labor. Four themes were generated from open-ended questions: value of the information sheet, knowing how to be a support person, connecting midwives with being woman-centered, and choosing the support person.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The availability of an information resource was of benefit for women, support people and midwives, contributing to women feeling more informed in choosing their support person. Midwives felt they had evidence to support conversations with women, contributing to the feeling of being woman-centered. Support people had increased confidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":32920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Midwifery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11339884/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/191162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Midwives in an Australian birth unit undertook a project to develop a resource for women and their support person. The aim of this study was to explore how the women, support persons and midwives viewed the introduction of this resource designed to guide and support women in their choice of support person.

Methods: A quantitative survey study was used to explore how three participant groups viewed the introduction of a support person information resource. A hospital designed survey was developed for women, support people and midwives. Data were analyzed using SPSS, version 26 and Braun and Clarke's guide for thematic analysis.

Results: More than half (55%) of the midwives believed that the information resource presented influenced women's choice of support people during labor. Almost three-quarters (72%) of the women did not change their choice of number of support people that they wanted during their labor. The majority (83%) of women would recommend the support person brochure to other women. The majority (83%) of support people stayed the entire duration of labor. Four themes were generated from open-ended questions: value of the information sheet, knowing how to be a support person, connecting midwives with being woman-centered, and choosing the support person.

Conclusions: The availability of an information resource was of benefit for women, support people and midwives, contributing to women feeling more informed in choosing their support person. Midwives felt they had evidence to support conversations with women, contributing to the feeling of being woman-centered. Support people had increased confidence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
助产士、妇女和辅助人员对引入辅助人员信息资源的看法调查。
介绍:澳大利亚一家分娩单位的助产士开展了一个项目,为产妇及其辅助人员开发一种资源。本研究旨在探讨产妇、辅助人员和助产士如何看待这一资源的引入,该资源旨在指导和支持产妇选择辅助人员:方法:采用定量调查研究来探讨三个参与群体如何看待引入辅助人员信息资源。针对妇女、辅助人员和助产士设计了一份医院调查问卷。使用 SPSS 26 版本和 Braun 与 Clarke 的主题分析指南对数据进行了分析:半数以上(55%)的助产士认为,所提供的信息资源影响了产妇对辅助人员的选择。近四分之三(72%)的产妇没有改变她们在分娩过程中对支持人员数量的选择。大多数(83%)产妇会向其他产妇推荐辅助人员手册。大多数(83%)的支持人员在整个分娩过程中都没有离开。开放式问题产生了四个主题:信息表的价值、了解如何成为支持者、将助产士与以妇女为中心联系起来以及选择支持者:信息资源的提供对妇女、支持者和助产士都有好处,有助于妇女在选择支持者时更加知情。助产士认为她们有证据支持与妇女的对话,从而增强了以妇女为中心的感觉。辅助人员增强了信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Midwifery
European Journal of Midwifery Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
15.80%
发文量
65
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ritgen's maneuver in childbirth care: A case-control study in a Central Italian setting. Women's bodily experience of antenatal breastmilk expression from 34 weeks of gestation: Qualitative results from the Express-MOM study. Sexual health in menopausal women with symptoms of pelvic floor disorders. Women's suggestions on how to improve the quality of maternal and newborn care: A qualitative analysis from the IMAgiNE EURO survey in Italy during the two years of the COVID-19 pandemic. Rebozo and advanced maternal postures: A promising set of intrapartum interventions to reduce persistent occiput posterior position of the fetal head.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1