Intramedullary Nailing Technique for Proximal Humeral Fractures Using a Straight Antegrade Nail with Locking Tuberosity Fixation.

IF 1 Q3 SURGERY JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques Pub Date : 2024-08-22 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00040
Brian P Davis, Libby A Mauter, Benjamin W Sears, Armodios M Hatzidakis
{"title":"Intramedullary Nailing Technique for Proximal Humeral Fractures Using a Straight Antegrade Nail with Locking Tuberosity Fixation.","authors":"Brian P Davis, Libby A Mauter, Benjamin W Sears, Armodios M Hatzidakis","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intramedullary straight nail fixation of proximal humeral fractures using a locking mechanism provides advantages compared with plating, including (1) less soft-tissue dissection, which preserves periosteal blood supply and soft-tissue attachments; (2) improved construct stability for comminuted fractures or osteopenic bone; and (3) shorter operative time for simpler fractures.</p><p><strong>Description: </strong>The patient is placed in the beach-chair position with the head of the bed elevated approximately 45°. The fracture is reduced with use of closed or percutaneous methods, ideally, or with an open approach if required. Temporary fragment fixation with percutaneous Kirschner wires can be utilized. A 1-cm incision is made just anterior to the acromioclavicular joint, overlying the zenith of the humeral head and in line with the diaphysis. A guide-pin is then placed through this incision and is verified to be centrally located and in line with the humeral diaphysis on fluoroscopic views. The guide-pin is advanced into the diaphysis. A cannulated 9-mm reamer is inserted over the guide-pin to create a starting position. The nail is then inserted, with adequate fragment reduction maintained until the proximal nail portion is buried under the subchondral humeral head. The proximal screw trajectory and alignment are checked fluoroscopically. The proximal locking screws are pre-drilled and inserted first using percutaneous drill sleeves through the radiolucent targeting jig. The screw is inserted through the guide and is advanced into the nail until appropriately seated. This process is then repeated for the other proximal screws as necessary. Finally, the distal diaphyseal screws are pre-drilled and inserted in a similar percutaneous fashion using the jig, and the jig is removed. Final orthogonal images are obtained. Copious irrigation of the incisions is performed and they are closed and dressed with a sterile dressing. The operative arm is placed in an abduction sling.</p><p><strong>Alternatives: </strong>Alternative treatment options for proximal humeral fractures include nonoperative treatment with use of a sling, percutaneous reduction and internal fixation with Kirschner wires, open reduction and internal fixation with a locking plate and screw construct, hemiarthroplasty, and anatomic or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty<sup>1</sup>.</p><p><strong>Rationale: </strong>The presently described technique for proximal humeral fracture fixation using a straight, antegrade, locking nail allows for minimal soft-tissue disruption, preserving vascularity and soft-tissue support and achieving angularly stable fixation in often osteopenic bone. The superior and in-line entry point avoids complications of rotator cuff injury and/or subacromial impingement. The proximal locking screws avoid complications of screw penetration or migration. This technique is appropriate for surgically indicated Neer 2-, 3-, and 4-part humeral fractures, including in elderly patients, when the humeral head fragment remains viable<sup>1-5</sup>.</p><p><strong>Expected outcomes: </strong>Based on available Level-III and IV evidence using this technique, patients should expect recovered motion and the ability to perform daily activities independently, with a mean active elevation of 132° to 136°<sup>1,4,6</sup>, external rotation of 37° to 52°<sup>1,4,6</sup>, and internal rotation to L3<sup>1</sup>. Pain scores improved significantly from preoperatively to postoperatively, with a mean pain score of 1.4 on the visual analogue scale<sup>3,4,6</sup>. Patient-reported outcomes were good to excellent, with Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) scores of 80% to 81%<sup>1,6</sup>, mean Constant scores from 71 to 81<sup>1,3,4,6</sup>, and high rates of patient satisfaction (97% satisfied or very satisfied)<sup>4</sup>. Studies also demonstrated good to excellent fracture healing, with no tuberosity migration and low rates of nonunion (0% to 5%)<sup>1,6</sup> and humeral head necrosis (0% to 4%)<sup>1,4</sup>. Revision rates ranged from 10.5% to 16.7%<sup>4,6</sup>.</p><p><strong>Important tips: </strong>The starting position of the guide-pin must be central and at the zenith of the humeral head on the anteroposterior Grashey and the scapular Y views, and the guide-pin must be aligned with the diaphysis prior to advancing it.Failure to bluntly dissect the percutaneous incisions risks injury to the axillary nerve.Verify correct version of the nail prior to drilling any screws, to avoid incorrect version and potential loss of functional rotation.</p><p><strong>Acronyms and abbreviations: </strong>ABD = abductionAP = anteroposteriorCT = computed tomographyER = external rotationFF = forward flexion (forward elevation)IR = internal rotationSANE = Single Assessment Numerical EvaluationSSV = Subjective Shoulder ValueVAS = Visual Analogue Scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":44676,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11340924/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intramedullary straight nail fixation of proximal humeral fractures using a locking mechanism provides advantages compared with plating, including (1) less soft-tissue dissection, which preserves periosteal blood supply and soft-tissue attachments; (2) improved construct stability for comminuted fractures or osteopenic bone; and (3) shorter operative time for simpler fractures.

Description: The patient is placed in the beach-chair position with the head of the bed elevated approximately 45°. The fracture is reduced with use of closed or percutaneous methods, ideally, or with an open approach if required. Temporary fragment fixation with percutaneous Kirschner wires can be utilized. A 1-cm incision is made just anterior to the acromioclavicular joint, overlying the zenith of the humeral head and in line with the diaphysis. A guide-pin is then placed through this incision and is verified to be centrally located and in line with the humeral diaphysis on fluoroscopic views. The guide-pin is advanced into the diaphysis. A cannulated 9-mm reamer is inserted over the guide-pin to create a starting position. The nail is then inserted, with adequate fragment reduction maintained until the proximal nail portion is buried under the subchondral humeral head. The proximal screw trajectory and alignment are checked fluoroscopically. The proximal locking screws are pre-drilled and inserted first using percutaneous drill sleeves through the radiolucent targeting jig. The screw is inserted through the guide and is advanced into the nail until appropriately seated. This process is then repeated for the other proximal screws as necessary. Finally, the distal diaphyseal screws are pre-drilled and inserted in a similar percutaneous fashion using the jig, and the jig is removed. Final orthogonal images are obtained. Copious irrigation of the incisions is performed and they are closed and dressed with a sterile dressing. The operative arm is placed in an abduction sling.

Alternatives: Alternative treatment options for proximal humeral fractures include nonoperative treatment with use of a sling, percutaneous reduction and internal fixation with Kirschner wires, open reduction and internal fixation with a locking plate and screw construct, hemiarthroplasty, and anatomic or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty1.

Rationale: The presently described technique for proximal humeral fracture fixation using a straight, antegrade, locking nail allows for minimal soft-tissue disruption, preserving vascularity and soft-tissue support and achieving angularly stable fixation in often osteopenic bone. The superior and in-line entry point avoids complications of rotator cuff injury and/or subacromial impingement. The proximal locking screws avoid complications of screw penetration or migration. This technique is appropriate for surgically indicated Neer 2-, 3-, and 4-part humeral fractures, including in elderly patients, when the humeral head fragment remains viable1-5.

Expected outcomes: Based on available Level-III and IV evidence using this technique, patients should expect recovered motion and the ability to perform daily activities independently, with a mean active elevation of 132° to 136°1,4,6, external rotation of 37° to 52°1,4,6, and internal rotation to L31. Pain scores improved significantly from preoperatively to postoperatively, with a mean pain score of 1.4 on the visual analogue scale3,4,6. Patient-reported outcomes were good to excellent, with Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) scores of 80% to 81%1,6, mean Constant scores from 71 to 811,3,4,6, and high rates of patient satisfaction (97% satisfied or very satisfied)4. Studies also demonstrated good to excellent fracture healing, with no tuberosity migration and low rates of nonunion (0% to 5%)1,6 and humeral head necrosis (0% to 4%)1,4. Revision rates ranged from 10.5% to 16.7%4,6.

Important tips: The starting position of the guide-pin must be central and at the zenith of the humeral head on the anteroposterior Grashey and the scapular Y views, and the guide-pin must be aligned with the diaphysis prior to advancing it.Failure to bluntly dissect the percutaneous incisions risks injury to the axillary nerve.Verify correct version of the nail prior to drilling any screws, to avoid incorrect version and potential loss of functional rotation.

Acronyms and abbreviations: ABD = abductionAP = anteroposteriorCT = computed tomographyER = external rotationFF = forward flexion (forward elevation)IR = internal rotationSANE = Single Assessment Numerical EvaluationSSV = Subjective Shoulder ValueVAS = Visual Analogue Scale.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肱骨近端骨折的髓内钉技术--使用前向直形钉和锁定关节突固定。
背景:使用锁定机制对肱骨近端骨折进行髓内直钉固定与钢板固定相比具有以下优势:(1)减少软组织剥离,从而保留骨膜血供和软组织附着;(2)提高粉碎性骨折或骨质疏松骨的结构稳定性;(3)缩短简单骨折的手术时间:患者取沙滩椅体位,床头抬高约 45°。理想情况下使用闭合或经皮方法进行骨折复位,必要时也可使用开放方法。可以使用经皮基氏钢丝临时固定骨折片。在肩锁关节前方、肱骨头天顶上方并与骨骺平行处切开一个 1 厘米的切口。然后通过该切口放置导针,并在透视图上确认导针位于肱骨干的中心位置并与肱骨干一致。将导针推进干骺端。在导针上插入插管式 9 毫米铰刀,以确定起始位置。然后插入钉子,保持足够的碎片缩小,直到近端钉子部分埋入软骨下肱骨头。通过透视检查近端螺钉的轨迹和对齐情况。近端锁定螺钉首先使用经皮钻套管通过放射透视瞄准夹具进行预钻孔和插入。螺钉通过导板插入,并推进到钉内,直至适当就位。然后根据需要对其他近端螺钉重复这一过程。最后,使用夹具以类似的经皮方式预钻并插入远端骺端螺钉,然后移除夹具。最后获得正交图像。对切口进行大量冲洗,关闭切口并用无菌敷料包扎。将手术手臂置于外展吊带中:肱骨近端骨折的替代治疗方案包括使用吊带的非手术治疗、经皮复位并使用 Kirschner 钢丝进行内固定、切开复位并使用锁定钢板和螺钉进行内固定、半关节成形术以及解剖或反向全肩关节成形术1。理由:目前所描述的肱骨近端骨折固定技术使用的是直向、前向锁定钉,可将软组织破坏降到最低,保留血管和软组织支撑,并在通常骨质疏松的骨质中实现角度稳定的固定。上行和直行入路点可避免肩袖损伤和/或肩峰下撞击的并发症。近端锁定螺钉可避免螺钉穿透或移位的并发症。当肱骨头碎片仍然存活时,该技术适用于有手术指征的 Neer 2、3 和 4 部分肱骨骨折,包括老年患者1-5:根据现有的III级和IV级证据,使用该技术后,患者的活动能力有望恢复,并能独立进行日常活动,平均主动抬高132°至136°1,4,6,外旋37°至52°1,4,6,内旋至L31。疼痛评分从术前到术后有明显改善,视觉模拟评分的平均疼痛评分为1.4分3,4,6。患者报告的结果良好至极佳,单次数字评估(SANE)得分率为80%至81%1,6,康斯坦茨平均得分率为71至811分3,4,6,患者满意度高(97%满意或非常满意)4。 研究还显示骨折愈合良好至极佳,无结节移位,未愈合率(0%至5%)1,6和肱骨头坏死率(0%至4%)较低1,4。重要提示:重要提示:导引钉的起始位置必须位于肱骨头的中央,在Grashey前后位切面和肩胛Y切面上位于肱骨头的天顶,在推进导引钉之前必须将其与骨骺对齐。在经皮切口处进行钝性剥离时,可能会损伤腋神经。在钻入任何螺钉之前,都要确认钉子的正确版本,以避免版本不正确和潜在的功能性旋转损失:ABD=外展AP=前胸CT=计算机断层扫描ER=外旋FF=前屈(前抬)IR=内旋SANE=单一评估数值评价SSV=肩部主观值VAS=视觉模拟量表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques (JBJS EST) is the premier journal describing how to perform orthopaedic surgical procedures, verified by evidence-based outcomes, vetted by peer review, while utilizing online delivery, imagery and video to optimize the educational experience, thereby enhancing patient care.
期刊最新文献
Bikini Incision Modification of the Direct Anterior Approach. Closed Intramedullary Pinning of Displaced Radial Neck Fracture (Metaizeau Technique). Flexible Intramedullary Nail Placement in Pediatric Humerus Fractures. Ligamentum Flavum Flap Technique in Lumbar Microdiscectomy. Surgery for Pediatric Trigger Finger.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1