Validation and reliability of the Simple Achille Value (SAV) in Achilles tendon disorders.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Foot and Ankle Surgery Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1016/j.fas.2024.08.001
Lambrey Pierre-Jean, Thiounn Alexis, Lopes Ronny
{"title":"Validation and reliability of the Simple Achille Value (SAV) in Achilles tendon disorders.","authors":"Lambrey Pierre-Jean, Thiounn Alexis, Lopes Ronny","doi":"10.1016/j.fas.2024.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Achilles tendon (AT) disorders significantly impact patient life, necessitating accurate assessment tools. Current methods are often complex and time-consuming. This study aims to validate the Simple Ankle Value (SAV) for AT disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter study was conducted involving 101 participants, including a surgical, a conservative, and a control group. Participants completed the SAV, VISA-A, and EFAS scores. The study assessed correlations among scores, reliability, responsiveness to change, threshold and ceiling effect and discriminative ability of the SAV.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant strong correlation with the EFAS and a significant moderate to strong correlation with the VISA-A. The score showed excellent reliability (ρ = 0.95, 95 %CI: [0.913; 0.976], p < 0.001). Responsiveness to change was significant between preoperative and postoperative SAV (37.99 ± 25.73 vs 70.86 ± 21.26). The SAV discriminated between patient and controls with no threshold or ceiling effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SAV provides a valid, reliable, and responsive method for assessing AT disorders. It offers a simplified and effective alternative to more complex scores.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.</p>","PeriodicalId":48743,"journal":{"name":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot and Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2024.08.001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Achilles tendon (AT) disorders significantly impact patient life, necessitating accurate assessment tools. Current methods are often complex and time-consuming. This study aims to validate the Simple Ankle Value (SAV) for AT disorders.

Methods: A multicenter study was conducted involving 101 participants, including a surgical, a conservative, and a control group. Participants completed the SAV, VISA-A, and EFAS scores. The study assessed correlations among scores, reliability, responsiveness to change, threshold and ceiling effect and discriminative ability of the SAV.

Results: There was a significant strong correlation with the EFAS and a significant moderate to strong correlation with the VISA-A. The score showed excellent reliability (ρ = 0.95, 95 %CI: [0.913; 0.976], p < 0.001). Responsiveness to change was significant between preoperative and postoperative SAV (37.99 ± 25.73 vs 70.86 ± 21.26). The SAV discriminated between patient and controls with no threshold or ceiling effect.

Conclusion: The SAV provides a valid, reliable, and responsive method for assessing AT disorders. It offers a simplified and effective alternative to more complex scores.

Study design: Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跟腱疾病中简单阿希尔值(SAV)的验证和可靠性。
背景:跟腱(AT)疾病严重影响患者的生活,因此需要精确的评估工具。目前的评估方法通常既复杂又耗时。本研究旨在验证针对跟腱疾病的简单踝关节值(SAV):这项多中心研究涉及 101 名参与者,包括手术组、保守组和对照组。参与者完成了 SAV、VISA-A 和 EFAS 评分。研究评估了 SAV 各项评分之间的相关性、可靠性、对变化的反应性、阈值和上限效应以及判别能力:结果:SAV 与 EFAS 有明显的强相关性,与 VISA-A 有明显的中强相关性。该评分显示出极佳的可靠性(ρ = 0.95,95 %CI:[0.913; 0.976],p 结论:SAV 提供了有效、可靠的心理评估方法:SAV 提供了一种有效、可靠且反应迅速的方法来评估 AT 疾病。研究设计:研究设计:队列研究(诊断);证据等级,2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Foot and Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
16.00%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: Foot and Ankle Surgery is essential reading for everyone interested in the foot and ankle and its disorders. The approach is broad and includes all aspects of the subject from basic science to clinical management. Problems of both children and adults are included, as is trauma and chronic disease. Foot and Ankle Surgery is the official journal of European Foot and Ankle Society. The aims of this journal are to promote the art and science of ankle and foot surgery, to publish peer-reviewed research articles, to provide regular reviews by acknowledged experts on common problems, and to provide a forum for discussion with letters to the Editors. Reviews of books are also published. Papers are invited for possible publication in Foot and Ankle Surgery on the understanding that the material has not been published elsewhere or accepted for publication in another journal and does not infringe prior copyright.
期刊最新文献
Comparative biomechanical study of different screw fixation methods for minimally invasive hallux valgus surgery: A finite element analysis. Younger age correlates with increased gutter impingement rates after total ankle arthroplasty. The clinical outcome comparison between trans-syndesmotic fixation and anatomic deltoid ligament repair in unstable ankle fractures with medial clear space widening: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Use of computer-assisted hexapod external fixators for complex foot and ankle reconstructions - An analysis of functional outcomes and complications. Large language models and common patient concerns on hallux valgus: Comment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1