Stigma in steatotic liver disease: A survey of patients from Saudi Arabia.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-22 DOI:10.4103/sjg.sjg_122_24
Saleh A Alqahtani, Khalid Alswat, Mohamed Mawardi, Faisal M Sanai, Faisal Abaakhail, Saad Alghamdi, Waleed K Al-Hamoudi, Fatema Nader, Maria Stepanova, Zobair M Younossi
{"title":"Stigma in steatotic liver disease: A survey of patients from Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Saleh A Alqahtani, Khalid Alswat, Mohamed Mawardi, Faisal M Sanai, Faisal Abaakhail, Saad Alghamdi, Waleed K Al-Hamoudi, Fatema Nader, Maria Stepanova, Zobair M Younossi","doi":"10.4103/sjg.sjg_122_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A recent name change of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) or metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease was primarily driven by potential stigma associated with the terminology. This stigma can be different between patients and healthcare providers and differ according to geographic regions of the world. Our aim was to better understand stigma and disease burden among patients with NAFLD enrolled in the global survey from Saudi Arabia (SA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Members of the Global NASH Council created a 68-item survey about patients' experience with NAFLD, covering history of stigmatization and discrimination due to the disease, various aspects of the disease burden [(Liver Disease Burden (LDB), 35 items, 7 domains], and perception of various diagnostic terms for NAFLD. Patients whose country of residence was SA were asked to complete the survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey was completed by 804 patients with NAFLD from SA. Of all enrolled patients, 17% ever disclosed having NAFLD/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) to family/friends. The most commonly used term for the disease was \"fatty liver\" (96% used it at least sometimes, 79% frequently or always). There were 3.7% who reported experiencing stigma or discrimination (at least sometimes) due to obesity/overweight versus only 2.7% due to NAFLD. Female patients reported a history of stigmatization or discrimination more frequently than males: 5.9% versus 3.0% due to obesity ( P = 0.06) and 5.4% versus 1.8% due to NAFLD ( P = 0.01). There were 43% of patients who reported ever missing or avoiding a visit to a primary care provider due to NAFLD (48% male vs 28% female, P < 0.0001). The greatest social-emotional burden among patients with NAFLD (by LDB) was being or being identified as a person with liver disease (10% agree, 4% male vs 26% female) and feeling like they could not do anything about their liver disease (6.4% agree, 3% male vs 16% female). Regarding how patients perceived diagnostic terms, there were no substantial differences between \"fatty liver disease\", \"NAFLD\", \"NASH\", and \"MAFLD\".</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stigmatization in terms of disease burden, disease-related stigma, and perception of various diagnostic terms are rarely observed in patients with NAFLD in SA. In comparison to male patients, female patients with NAFLD reported more commonly a history of stigmatization and discrimination and a significantly greater disease burden. The findings will help inform policymakers to develop programs to increase awareness and provide education about stigma related to NAFLD.</p>","PeriodicalId":48881,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjg.sjg_122_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A recent name change of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) or metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease was primarily driven by potential stigma associated with the terminology. This stigma can be different between patients and healthcare providers and differ according to geographic regions of the world. Our aim was to better understand stigma and disease burden among patients with NAFLD enrolled in the global survey from Saudi Arabia (SA).

Methods: Members of the Global NASH Council created a 68-item survey about patients' experience with NAFLD, covering history of stigmatization and discrimination due to the disease, various aspects of the disease burden [(Liver Disease Burden (LDB), 35 items, 7 domains], and perception of various diagnostic terms for NAFLD. Patients whose country of residence was SA were asked to complete the survey.

Results: The survey was completed by 804 patients with NAFLD from SA. Of all enrolled patients, 17% ever disclosed having NAFLD/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) to family/friends. The most commonly used term for the disease was "fatty liver" (96% used it at least sometimes, 79% frequently or always). There were 3.7% who reported experiencing stigma or discrimination (at least sometimes) due to obesity/overweight versus only 2.7% due to NAFLD. Female patients reported a history of stigmatization or discrimination more frequently than males: 5.9% versus 3.0% due to obesity ( P = 0.06) and 5.4% versus 1.8% due to NAFLD ( P = 0.01). There were 43% of patients who reported ever missing or avoiding a visit to a primary care provider due to NAFLD (48% male vs 28% female, P < 0.0001). The greatest social-emotional burden among patients with NAFLD (by LDB) was being or being identified as a person with liver disease (10% agree, 4% male vs 26% female) and feeling like they could not do anything about their liver disease (6.4% agree, 3% male vs 16% female). Regarding how patients perceived diagnostic terms, there were no substantial differences between "fatty liver disease", "NAFLD", "NASH", and "MAFLD".

Conclusion: Stigmatization in terms of disease burden, disease-related stigma, and perception of various diagnostic terms are rarely observed in patients with NAFLD in SA. In comparison to male patients, female patients with NAFLD reported more commonly a history of stigmatization and discrimination and a significantly greater disease burden. The findings will help inform policymakers to develop programs to increase awareness and provide education about stigma related to NAFLD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脂肪肝患者的耻辱感:对沙特阿拉伯患者的调查。
背景:最近,非酒精性脂肪肝(NAFLD)或代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪肝(MAFLD)更名为代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪肝,其主要原因是与该术语相关的潜在耻辱感。患者和医疗服务提供者之间可能会产生不同的成见,而且这种成见会因世界不同的地理区域而有所不同。我们的目的是更好地了解沙特阿拉伯(SA)参加全球调查的非酒精性脂肪肝患者的耻辱感和疾病负担:全球非酒精性脂肪肝委员会(Global NASH Council)的成员就非酒精性脂肪肝患者的经历编制了一份包含 68 个项目的调查表,内容包括患者因非酒精性脂肪肝而蒙受耻辱和歧视的历史、疾病负担的各个方面[(肝病负担(LDB),35 个项目,7 个领域],以及对各种非酒精性脂肪肝诊断术语的看法。要求居住国为南澳大利亚的患者填写调查问卷:804名南澳大利亚非酒精性脂肪肝患者完成了调查。在所有参与调查的患者中,17%曾向家人/朋友透露自己患有非酒精性脂肪肝/非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)。最常用的疾病术语是 "脂肪肝"(96%的人至少有时使用,79%的人经常或总是使用)。有 3.7% 的患者表示因肥胖/超重而遭受侮辱或歧视(至少有时),而因非酒精性脂肪肝而遭受侮辱或歧视的患者仅占 2.7%。女性患者比男性患者更频繁地报告自己曾遭受鄙视或歧视:5.9%的患者因肥胖而遭受鄙视或歧视,而3.0%的患者因非酒精性脂肪肝而遭受鄙视或歧视(P = 0.06);5.4%的患者因非酒精性脂肪肝而遭受鄙视或歧视,而1.8%的患者因非酒精性脂肪肝而遭受鄙视或歧视(P = 0.01)。有43%的患者表示曾因非酒精性脂肪肝而错过或避免看初级保健医生(男性48%,女性28%,P < 0.0001)。非酒精性脂肪肝患者最大的社会情感负担(按低密度脂蛋白胆固醇计算)是被认定为肝病患者(10%同意,4%男性对26%女性),以及感觉自己对肝病无能为力(6.4%同意,3%男性对16%女性)。关于患者对诊断术语的看法,"脂肪肝"、"非酒精性脂肪肝"、"NASH "和 "MAFLD "之间没有实质性差异:结论:在南澳大利亚,非酒精性脂肪肝患者在疾病负担、与疾病相关的耻辱感以及对各种诊断术语的认知方面很少受到鄙视。与男性非酒精性脂肪肝患者相比,女性非酒精性脂肪肝患者报告的耻辱化和歧视史更为普遍,疾病负担也明显加重。这些研究结果将有助于决策者制定计划,提高人们对非酒精性脂肪肝相关污名化问题的认识并提供相关教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
63
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: The Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology (SJG) is an open access peer-reviewed publication. Authors are invited to submit articles in the field of gastroenterology, hepatology and nutrition, with a wide spectrum of coverage including basic science, epidemiology, diagnostics, therapeutics, public health, and standards of health care in relation to the concerned specialty. Review articles are usually by invitation. However review articles of current interest and a high standard of scientific value could also be considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
The effectiveness of vedolizumab in advanced therapy-experienced ulcerative colitis patients: Real world data from the Inflammatory Bowel Disease of the Middle East (IBD-ME) Registry group. Rethinking about the definition of GERD. CEBPB dampens the cuproptosis sensitivity of colorectal cancer cells by facilitating the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. Unravelling the therapeutic landscape of bile acid-based therapies in gastrointestinal disorders. Exploring the association between microscopic colitis and celiac disease: A comprehensive analysis using the national in-patient data (2016-2019).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1