Socially plastic responses in females are robust to evolutionary manipulations of adult sex ratio and adult nutrition.

IF 2.1 3区 生物学 Q3 ECOLOGY Journal of Evolutionary Biology Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1093/jeb/voae102
Nathan McConnell, Wilfried Haerty, Matthew J G Gage, Tracey Chapman
{"title":"Socially plastic responses in females are robust to evolutionary manipulations of adult sex ratio and adult nutrition.","authors":"Nathan McConnell, Wilfried Haerty, Matthew J G Gage, Tracey Chapman","doi":"10.1093/jeb/voae102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Socially plastic behaviours are widespread among animals and can have a significant impact on fitness. Here, we investigated whether the socially plastic responses of female Drosophila melanogaster can evolve in predictable ways following long-term manipulation of adult sex ratio and adult nutrient availability. Previous reports show that female D. melanogaster respond plastically to their same-sex social environment and lay significantly fewer eggs after mating when previously exposed to other females. In this study, we tested 2 hypotheses, using females drawn from lines with an evolutionary history of exposure to variation in adult sex ratio (male-biased, female-biased or equal sex ratio) and adult nutritional environment (high or low quality). The first was that a history of elevated competition in female-biased regimes would select for increased plastic fecundity responses in comparison to females from other lines. The second was that these responses would also be magnified under poor nutritional resource regimes. Neither hypothesis was supported. Instead, we found that plastic fecundity responses were retained in females from all lines and did not differ significantly across any of them. The lack of differences does not appear to be due to insufficient selection, as we did observe significant evolutionary responses in virgin egg-laying patterns according to sex ratio and nutritional regime. The lack of variation in the magnitude of predicted plasticity is consistent with the idea that the costs of maintaining plasticity are low, benefits high, and that plasticity itself can be relatively hard wired.</p>","PeriodicalId":50198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evolutionary Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evolutionary Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jeb/voae102","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Socially plastic behaviours are widespread among animals and can have a significant impact on fitness. Here, we investigated whether the socially plastic responses of female Drosophila melanogaster can evolve in predictable ways following long-term manipulation of adult sex ratio and adult nutrient availability. Previous reports show that female D. melanogaster respond plastically to their same-sex social environment and lay significantly fewer eggs after mating when previously exposed to other females. In this study, we tested 2 hypotheses, using females drawn from lines with an evolutionary history of exposure to variation in adult sex ratio (male-biased, female-biased or equal sex ratio) and adult nutritional environment (high or low quality). The first was that a history of elevated competition in female-biased regimes would select for increased plastic fecundity responses in comparison to females from other lines. The second was that these responses would also be magnified under poor nutritional resource regimes. Neither hypothesis was supported. Instead, we found that plastic fecundity responses were retained in females from all lines and did not differ significantly across any of them. The lack of differences does not appear to be due to insufficient selection, as we did observe significant evolutionary responses in virgin egg-laying patterns according to sex ratio and nutritional regime. The lack of variation in the magnitude of predicted plasticity is consistent with the idea that the costs of maintaining plasticity are low, benefits high, and that plasticity itself can be relatively hard wired.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
雌性的社会可塑性反应对成年性别比和成年营养的进化操纵非常稳健。
社会可塑性行为在动物中非常普遍,并可能对适应性产生重大影响。在这里,我们研究了雌性黑腹果蝇的社会可塑性反应是否会在长期操纵成虫性别比和成虫营养供应后以可预测的方式进化。以前的报告显示,雌性黑腹果蝇对同性社会环境的反应是可塑的,在交配后,如果以前接触过其他雌性果蝇,产卵量会明显减少。在这项研究中,我们利用雌性黑腹滨蝽进化史中暴露于成年性别比变化(雄性偏向、雌性偏向或性别比相同)和成年营养环境变化(高质量或低质量)的品系,对两个假设进行了检验。第一个假设是,与其他品系的雌性相比,在雌性偏向的环境中竞争加剧的历史将选择性地增加可塑性繁殖力反应。第二种假设是,在营养资源匮乏的情况下,这些反应也会被放大。这两个假设都没有得到支持。相反,我们发现所有品系的雌性都保留了塑性繁殖力反应,而且在任何品系之间都没有显著差异。没有差异似乎并不是因为选择不足,因为我们确实观察到处女产卵模式在性别比例和营养机制方面有显著的进化反应。预测的可塑性大小不存在差异,这与维持可塑性的成本低、收益高以及可塑性本身可能相对较强的观点是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Journal of Evolutionary Biology 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
152
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: It covers both micro- and macro-evolution of all types of organisms. The aim of the Journal is to integrate perspectives across molecular and microbial evolution, behaviour, genetics, ecology, life histories, development, palaeontology, systematics and morphology.
期刊最新文献
Variation in thermal courtship activity curves across individuals exceeds variation across populations and sexes. Selection for greater dispersal in early life increases rate of age-dependent decline in locomotor activity and shortens lifespan. The improbability of detecting trade-offs and some practical solutions. Evolution of the division of labour between templates and catalysts in spatial replicator models. The relationship between neutral genetic diversity and performance in wild arthropod populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1