Knee muscle strength and steadiness for individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and knee osteoarthritis

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Clinical Biomechanics Pub Date : 2024-08-18 DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106331
{"title":"Knee muscle strength and steadiness for individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and knee osteoarthritis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Strength and neuromuscular decrements following knee musculoskeletal injury may accelerate knee osteoarthritis development. This study assessed isometric knee extensor and flexor strength and steadiness between individuals with knee injury, i.e., ligament reconstruction, and knee osteoarthritis to healthy age-matched controls.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Four cohorts (1: knee injury and 2: age-matched controls, and 3: radiographic knee osteoarthritis and 4: age-matched controls) were recruited. Participants performed maximal voluntary isometric knee extensor and flexor contractions. Then, strength (e.g., peak and rate of torque development) and steadiness (e.g., peak power, mean, and median frequency) were derived from each raw torque-time curve and associated power spectral density. A Kruskal-Wallis H test and Spearman's rho correlation analysis assessed cohort differences and association between knee extensor and flexor strength and steadiness.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>The young adult control and knee injury cohorts exhibited greater knee extensor and flexor strength than the older, knee osteoarthritis cohort (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.043). The knee injury cohort, despite being as strong as their healthy counterparts, were significantly less steady with a 92% increase in peak power frequency (<em>p</em> = 0.046). The osteoarthritis cohort exhibited 157% less total power compared to the knee injury and young control cohorts (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.019). Knee extensor and flexor peak torque, rate of torque development, and mean torque exhibit a significant, positive relation with total power (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.018).</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Individuals with knee injury and disease may exhibit weaker or less steady knee musculature, predisposing them to degenerative joint disease. Clinicians may need to restore knee extensor and flexor steadiness to facilitate better joint neuromuscular control.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50992,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biomechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003324001633","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Strength and neuromuscular decrements following knee musculoskeletal injury may accelerate knee osteoarthritis development. This study assessed isometric knee extensor and flexor strength and steadiness between individuals with knee injury, i.e., ligament reconstruction, and knee osteoarthritis to healthy age-matched controls.

Methods

Four cohorts (1: knee injury and 2: age-matched controls, and 3: radiographic knee osteoarthritis and 4: age-matched controls) were recruited. Participants performed maximal voluntary isometric knee extensor and flexor contractions. Then, strength (e.g., peak and rate of torque development) and steadiness (e.g., peak power, mean, and median frequency) were derived from each raw torque-time curve and associated power spectral density. A Kruskal-Wallis H test and Spearman's rho correlation analysis assessed cohort differences and association between knee extensor and flexor strength and steadiness.

Findings

The young adult control and knee injury cohorts exhibited greater knee extensor and flexor strength than the older, knee osteoarthritis cohort (p < 0.043). The knee injury cohort, despite being as strong as their healthy counterparts, were significantly less steady with a 92% increase in peak power frequency (p = 0.046). The osteoarthritis cohort exhibited 157% less total power compared to the knee injury and young control cohorts (p < 0.019). Knee extensor and flexor peak torque, rate of torque development, and mean torque exhibit a significant, positive relation with total power (p < 0.018).

Interpretation

Individuals with knee injury and disease may exhibit weaker or less steady knee musculature, predisposing them to degenerative joint disease. Clinicians may need to restore knee extensor and flexor steadiness to facilitate better joint neuromuscular control.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前交叉韧带重建和膝关节骨性关节炎患者的膝关节肌肉力量和稳定性。
背景:膝关节肌肉骨骼损伤后的力量和神经肌肉衰退可能会加速膝关节骨关节炎的发展。本研究评估了膝关节损伤(即韧带重建)和膝关节骨性关节炎患者与年龄匹配的健康对照组之间的等长膝关节伸屈肌力量和稳定性:招募了四个组群(1:膝关节损伤和 2:年龄匹配的对照组;3:放射性膝骨关节炎和 4:年龄匹配的对照组)。参与者进行最大限度的膝关节伸肌和屈肌自主等长收缩。然后,从每个原始扭矩-时间曲线和相关功率谱密度中得出力量(如扭矩发展的峰值和速率)和稳定性(如峰值功率、平均值和中位频率)。Kruskal-Wallis H 检验和 Spearman's rho 相关性分析评估了队列差异以及膝关节伸屈肌力量和稳定性之间的关联:结果:与年龄较大的膝关节骨性关节炎队列相比,年轻的对照组和膝关节损伤队列表现出更强的膝关节伸屈力量(p 解释:膝关节损伤和膝关节骨性关节炎患者的膝关节伸屈力量与稳定性之间存在差异:膝关节损伤和疾病患者可能会表现出膝关节肌肉较弱或不稳定,从而易患退行性关节疾病。临床医生可能需要恢复膝关节伸肌和屈肌的稳定性,以促进更好的关节神经肌肉控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Biomechanics
Clinical Biomechanics 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
189
审稿时长
12.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Biomechanics is an international multidisciplinary journal of biomechanics with a focus on medical and clinical applications of new knowledge in the field. The science of biomechanics helps explain the causes of cell, tissue, organ and body system disorders, and supports clinicians in the diagnosis, prognosis and evaluation of treatment methods and technologies. Clinical Biomechanics aims to strengthen the links between laboratory and clinic by publishing cutting-edge biomechanics research which helps to explain the causes of injury and disease, and which provides evidence contributing to improved clinical management. A rigorous peer review system is employed and every attempt is made to process and publish top-quality papers promptly. Clinical Biomechanics explores all facets of body system, organ, tissue and cell biomechanics, with an emphasis on medical and clinical applications of the basic science aspects. The role of basic science is therefore recognized in a medical or clinical context. The readership of the journal closely reflects its multi-disciplinary contents, being a balance of scientists, engineers and clinicians. The contents are in the form of research papers, brief reports, review papers and correspondence, whilst special interest issues and supplements are published from time to time. Disciplines covered include biomechanics and mechanobiology at all scales, bioengineering and use of tissue engineering and biomaterials for clinical applications, biophysics, as well as biomechanical aspects of medical robotics, ergonomics, physical and occupational therapeutics and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Mid-vastus approach induces milder short-term effects on postural control compared to parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. Between-limb difference in peak knee flexion angle can identify persons post-stroke with Stiff-Knee gait Fall assessment in healthy older adults: Approach using rambling-trembling decomposition method Biomechanical analysis of the effect of postero-latero-central tibial plateau fractures in the knee joint: Can posterior soft tissues prevent instability? A finite element study. Biomechanical modelling of indirect decompression in oblique lumbar intervertebral fusions – A finite element study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1