{"title":"THE EFFICACY OF INTRAVITREAL ANTI-VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR FOR RADIATION MACULOPATHY: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Sheng-Chu Chi, Hsin-Ho Chang","doi":"10.1097/IAE.0000000000004255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is the primary approach for managing radiation maculopathy. However, a noticeable gap exists in meta-analyses evaluating the efficacy of anti-VEGF therapy specifically in the context of radiation maculopathy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a review of comparative studies on anti-VEGF treatment up to October 2023. References were sourced from PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool assessed the quality of randomized controlled trials, while the Risk Of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tool evaluated nonrandomized controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen articles originating from 11 trials involving 2,525 eyes of 2,408 patients were included. Four trials with 2,226 eyes examined the effect of preventive anti-VEGF. Four trials with 189 eyes assessed the effect of anti-VEGF for preexisting maculopathy, and three trials with 110 eyes compared different anti-VEGF treatment modalities. In the preventive anti-VEGF treatment meta-analysis over a 24-month follow-up, the anti-VEGF group exhibited significantly fewer cases of radiation maculopathy (odds ratio: 0.40; 95% confidence interval: 0.25, 0.66, P = 0.0003, I 2 = 45%). For the meta-analysis of anti-VEGF treatment for preexisting radiation maculopathy over a 6-month follow-up, the anti-VEGF group showed improved visual acuity (SMD: -1.13, 95% confidence interval, -1.69 to -0.56, P < 0.0000, I 2 = 47%) and decreased central macular thickness (SMD: -0.59, 95% confidence interval, -1.13 to -0.05, P = 0.03, I 2 = 62%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prophylactic anti-VEGF effectively prevents radiation maculopathy and is also beneficial in treating preexisting radiation maculopathy. Intensive treatment initially provides early benefits, but the efficacy diminishes after transitioning to a treat-and-extend regimen.</p>","PeriodicalId":54486,"journal":{"name":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"2129-2139"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000004255","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is the primary approach for managing radiation maculopathy. However, a noticeable gap exists in meta-analyses evaluating the efficacy of anti-VEGF therapy specifically in the context of radiation maculopathy.
Methods: We conducted a review of comparative studies on anti-VEGF treatment up to October 2023. References were sourced from PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool assessed the quality of randomized controlled trials, while the Risk Of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tool evaluated nonrandomized controlled trials.
Results: Thirteen articles originating from 11 trials involving 2,525 eyes of 2,408 patients were included. Four trials with 2,226 eyes examined the effect of preventive anti-VEGF. Four trials with 189 eyes assessed the effect of anti-VEGF for preexisting maculopathy, and three trials with 110 eyes compared different anti-VEGF treatment modalities. In the preventive anti-VEGF treatment meta-analysis over a 24-month follow-up, the anti-VEGF group exhibited significantly fewer cases of radiation maculopathy (odds ratio: 0.40; 95% confidence interval: 0.25, 0.66, P = 0.0003, I 2 = 45%). For the meta-analysis of anti-VEGF treatment for preexisting radiation maculopathy over a 6-month follow-up, the anti-VEGF group showed improved visual acuity (SMD: -1.13, 95% confidence interval, -1.69 to -0.56, P < 0.0000, I 2 = 47%) and decreased central macular thickness (SMD: -0.59, 95% confidence interval, -1.13 to -0.05, P = 0.03, I 2 = 62%).
Conclusion: Prophylactic anti-VEGF effectively prevents radiation maculopathy and is also beneficial in treating preexisting radiation maculopathy. Intensive treatment initially provides early benefits, but the efficacy diminishes after transitioning to a treat-and-extend regimen.
期刊介绍:
RETINA® focuses exclusively on the growing specialty of vitreoretinal disorders. The Journal provides current information on diagnostic and therapeutic techniques. Its highly specialized and informative, peer-reviewed articles are easily applicable to clinical practice.
In addition to regular reports from clinical and basic science investigators, RETINA® publishes special features including periodic review articles on pertinent topics, special articles dealing with surgical and other therapeutic techniques, and abstract cards. Issues are abundantly illustrated in vivid full color.
Published 12 times per year, RETINA® is truly a “must have” publication for anyone connected to this field.