Cross-cultural validation of the genetic counseling outcome scale in Korea.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY Journal of Genetic Counseling Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1002/jgc4.1961
Sojin Yang, Yoon Jung Chang, Kyung Ok Kim, Beom Hee Lee, Sun-Young Kong, Marion McAllister, In Hee Choi
{"title":"Cross-cultural validation of the genetic counseling outcome scale in Korea.","authors":"Sojin Yang, Yoon Jung Chang, Kyung Ok Kim, Beom Hee Lee, Sun-Young Kong, Marion McAllister, In Hee Choi","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.1961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Genetic Counseling Outcome Scale (GCOS-24) was developed to measure patient-reported outcomes to evaluate the effectiveness of genetic counseling and testing services. In the current study, the Korean version of GCOS (K-GCOS) was developed to reflect the sociocultural characteristics of Korea, and its clinical applicability was assessed. Overall, 231 Koreans, including patients with genetic diseases and their family members, participated and completed the K-GCOS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) scale, and Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). Validity was examined by assessing the correlations between K-GCOS scores and other relevant scale scores. Reliability was confirmed using Cronbach's alpha and test-retest scores, measured over 2 weeks. We performed exploratory factor analysis of the five structures of GCOS-24. For K-GCOS, four-factor structures were identified: \"cognitive-behavioral control,\" \"uncertainty about control,\" \"hope,\" and \"emotional regulation.\" Four original GCOS-24 items were removed because of low factor loadings and small inter-item correlations. K-GCOS-20 scores were positively correlated with SWLS (r = 0.456) and MHLC-internal (r = 0.213) scores but negatively correlated with HADS (anxiety r = -0.428, depression r = -0.469) and MHLC-internal (r = -0.278) scores. These findings demonstrate that K-GCOS-20 is a reliable and valid tool for evaluating genetic counseling services in Korea.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1961","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Genetic Counseling Outcome Scale (GCOS-24) was developed to measure patient-reported outcomes to evaluate the effectiveness of genetic counseling and testing services. In the current study, the Korean version of GCOS (K-GCOS) was developed to reflect the sociocultural characteristics of Korea, and its clinical applicability was assessed. Overall, 231 Koreans, including patients with genetic diseases and their family members, participated and completed the K-GCOS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) scale, and Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). Validity was examined by assessing the correlations between K-GCOS scores and other relevant scale scores. Reliability was confirmed using Cronbach's alpha and test-retest scores, measured over 2 weeks. We performed exploratory factor analysis of the five structures of GCOS-24. For K-GCOS, four-factor structures were identified: "cognitive-behavioral control," "uncertainty about control," "hope," and "emotional regulation." Four original GCOS-24 items were removed because of low factor loadings and small inter-item correlations. K-GCOS-20 scores were positively correlated with SWLS (r = 0.456) and MHLC-internal (r = 0.213) scores but negatively correlated with HADS (anxiety r = -0.428, depression r = -0.469) and MHLC-internal (r = -0.278) scores. These findings demonstrate that K-GCOS-20 is a reliable and valid tool for evaluating genetic counseling services in Korea.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
遗传咨询结果量表在韩国的跨文化验证。
遗传咨询结果量表(GCOS-24)的开发是为了测量患者报告的结果,以评估遗传咨询和检测服务的有效性。本研究开发了韩国版 GCOS(K-GCOS),以反映韩国的社会文化特点,并对其临床适用性进行了评估。共有 231 名韩国人(包括遗传病患者及其家属)参与并完成了 K-GCOS、医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)、多维健康控制点量表(MHLC)和生活满意度量表(SWLS)。通过评估 K-GCOS 评分与其他相关量表评分之间的相关性来检验有效性。使用 Cronbach's alpha 和 2 周内的测试-再测分数确认了信度。我们对 GCOS-24 的五个结构进行了探索性因子分析。对于 K-GCOS,确定了四个因子结构:"认知行为控制"、"控制的不确定性"、"希望 "和 "情绪调节"。由于 GCOS-24 的因子负荷较低,且项目间相关性较小,因此删除了四个原始项目。K-GCOS-20 分数与 SWLS(r = 0.456)和 MHLC-内部(r = 0.213)分数呈正相关,但与 HADS(焦虑 r = -0.428,抑郁 r = -0.469)和 MHLC-内部(r = -0.278)分数呈负相关。这些研究结果表明,K-GCOS-20 是评估韩国遗传咨询服务的可靠有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Journal of Genetic Counseling GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
26.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.
期刊最新文献
The current landscape of clinical exome and genome reanalysis in the U.S. A cross-sectional survey-based exploration of diversity in the admissions committees and student cohorts of genetic counseling programs over time. An analysis of direct-to-consumer genetic testing portals and their communication of health risk and test limitations. Patient perceptions of genetic counselors' role and emotional support needs in adults with Parkinson's disease Clinical genetic counselors' use of people‐ and identity‐first language in regard to patients' identification with disability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1