Feasibility characteristics of wrist-worn fitness trackers in health status monitoring for post-COVID patients in remote and rural areas.

IF 7.7 PLOS digital health Pub Date : 2024-08-22 eCollection Date: 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000571
Madeleine Wiebe, Marnie Mackay, Ragur Krishnan, Julie Tian, Jakob Larsson, Setayesh Modanloo, Christiane Job McIntosh, Melissa Sztym, Gail Elton-Smith, Alyssa Rose, Chester Ho, Andrew Greenshaw, Bo Cao, Andrew Chan, Jake Hayward
{"title":"Feasibility characteristics of wrist-worn fitness trackers in health status monitoring for post-COVID patients in remote and rural areas.","authors":"Madeleine Wiebe, Marnie Mackay, Ragur Krishnan, Julie Tian, Jakob Larsson, Setayesh Modanloo, Christiane Job McIntosh, Melissa Sztym, Gail Elton-Smith, Alyssa Rose, Chester Ho, Andrew Greenshaw, Bo Cao, Andrew Chan, Jake Hayward","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Common, consumer-grade biosensors mounted on fitness trackers and smartwatches can measure an array of biometrics that have potential utility in post-discharge medical monitoring, especially in remote/rural communities. The feasibility characteristics for wrist-worn biosensors are poorly described for post-COVID conditions and rural populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively recruited patients in rural communities who were enrolled in an at-home rehabilitation program for post-COVID conditions. They were asked to wear a FitBit Charge 2 device and biosensor parameters were analyzed [e.g. heart rate, sleep, and activity]. Electronic patient reported outcome measures [E-PROMS] for mental [bi-weekly] and physical [daily] symptoms were collected using SMS text or email [per patient preference]. Exit surveys and interviews evaluated the patient experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten patients were observed for an average of 58 days and half [N = 5] were monitored for 8 weeks or more. Five patients [50%] had been hospitalized with COVID [mean stay = 41 days] and 4 [36%] had required mechanical ventilation. As baseline, patients had moderate to severe levels of anxiety, depression, and stress; fatigue and shortness of breath were the most prevalent physical symptoms. Four patients [40%] already owned a smartwatch. In total, 575 patient days of patient monitoring occurred across 10 patients. Biosensor data was usable for 91.3% of study hours and surveys were completed 82.1% and 78.7% of the time for physical and mental symptoms, respectively. Positive correlations were observed between stress and resting heart rate [r = 0.360, p<0.01], stress and daily steps [r = 0.335, p<0.01], and anxiety and daily steps [r = 0.289, p<0.01]. There was a trend toward negative correlation between sleep time and physical symptom burden [r = -0.211, p = 0.05]. Patients reported an overall positive experience and identified the potential for wearable devices to improve medical safety and access to care. Concerns around data privacy/security were infrequent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We report excellent feasibility characteristics for wrist-worn biosensors and e-PROMS as a possible substrate for multi-modal disease tracking in post-COVID conditions. Adapting consumer-grade wearables for medical use and scalable remote patient monitoring holds great potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"3 8","pages":"e0000571"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11340956/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Common, consumer-grade biosensors mounted on fitness trackers and smartwatches can measure an array of biometrics that have potential utility in post-discharge medical monitoring, especially in remote/rural communities. The feasibility characteristics for wrist-worn biosensors are poorly described for post-COVID conditions and rural populations.

Methods: We prospectively recruited patients in rural communities who were enrolled in an at-home rehabilitation program for post-COVID conditions. They were asked to wear a FitBit Charge 2 device and biosensor parameters were analyzed [e.g. heart rate, sleep, and activity]. Electronic patient reported outcome measures [E-PROMS] for mental [bi-weekly] and physical [daily] symptoms were collected using SMS text or email [per patient preference]. Exit surveys and interviews evaluated the patient experience.

Results: Ten patients were observed for an average of 58 days and half [N = 5] were monitored for 8 weeks or more. Five patients [50%] had been hospitalized with COVID [mean stay = 41 days] and 4 [36%] had required mechanical ventilation. As baseline, patients had moderate to severe levels of anxiety, depression, and stress; fatigue and shortness of breath were the most prevalent physical symptoms. Four patients [40%] already owned a smartwatch. In total, 575 patient days of patient monitoring occurred across 10 patients. Biosensor data was usable for 91.3% of study hours and surveys were completed 82.1% and 78.7% of the time for physical and mental symptoms, respectively. Positive correlations were observed between stress and resting heart rate [r = 0.360, p<0.01], stress and daily steps [r = 0.335, p<0.01], and anxiety and daily steps [r = 0.289, p<0.01]. There was a trend toward negative correlation between sleep time and physical symptom burden [r = -0.211, p = 0.05]. Patients reported an overall positive experience and identified the potential for wearable devices to improve medical safety and access to care. Concerns around data privacy/security were infrequent.

Conclusions: We report excellent feasibility characteristics for wrist-worn biosensors and e-PROMS as a possible substrate for multi-modal disease tracking in post-COVID conditions. Adapting consumer-grade wearables for medical use and scalable remote patient monitoring holds great potential.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腕戴式健身追踪器在监测偏远和农村地区 COVID 后患者健康状况中的可行性特征。
导言:安装在健身追踪器和智能手表上的普通消费级生物传感器可以测量一系列生物特征,在出院后医疗监测中具有潜在用途,尤其是在偏远/农村社区。腕戴式生物传感器在 COVID 后情况和农村人口中的可行性特征描述较少:我们前瞻性地招募了农村社区的患者,他们都参加了一项针对 COVID 后遗症的居家康复计划。我们要求他们佩戴 FitBit Charge 2 设备,并对生物传感器参数(如心率、睡眠和活动)进行分析。根据患者的偏好,通过短信或电子邮件收集患者对精神症状(每两周一次)和身体症状(每天一次)的电子报告结果[E-PROMS]。退出调查和访谈评估了患者的体验:10 名患者接受了平均 58 天的观察,半数患者 [N = 5] 接受了 8 周或更长时间的观察。五名患者[50%]曾因 COVID 住院[平均住院时间 = 41 天],四名患者[36%]需要机械通气。作为基线,患者的焦虑、抑郁和压力程度为中度到重度;疲劳和气短是最常见的身体症状。四名患者(40%)已拥有智能手表。10 名患者共接受了 575 天的患者监测。91.3%的研究时间内生物传感器数据可用,82.1%和78.7%的时间内完成了身体和精神症状调查。压力和静息心率之间呈正相关[r = 0.360, p结论:我们报告了腕戴式生物传感器和 e-PROMS 作为后 COVID 条件下多模式疾病跟踪的可能基质的出色可行性特征。将消费级可穿戴设备用于医疗用途和可扩展的远程病人监测具有巨大的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Economic cost of strategic implementation approaches to increase uptake of digital therapeutics for substance use disorders in a large integrated health system. Evaluating few-shot prompting for spectrogram-based lung sound classification using a multimodal language model. Development and validation of an artificial intelligence model based on liver CSE-MRI fat maps for predicting dyslipidemia. Digitally delivered, systemically challenged: A qualitative study of health system readiness for digital care. The impact of virtual care on drug prescribing practices: A scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1