Trajectories of polysubstance use: Are past-year internalizing and externalizing problems associated with trajectories of polysubstance use over time?

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Addictive behaviors Pub Date : 2024-08-18 DOI:10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108136
{"title":"Trajectories of polysubstance use: Are past-year internalizing and externalizing problems associated with trajectories of polysubstance use over time?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Polysubstance use among adults has been a public health concern in the U.S. and is associated with adverse consequences. This study aimed to identify the longitudinal trajectory of polysubstance use and test whether internalizing and externalizing problems predict it.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data of adults aged 18 and older (N = 15076) were extracted from the Waves 1–5 Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study (2013–2019). Group-Based Trajectory Modeling was performed to identify the trajectory of polysubstance use. Examined substances included use of cigarettes, e-cigarettes, excessive alcohol, cannabis, painkillers, and cocaine in past 30 days from all waves. Weighted multinomial logistic regressions were conducted to investigate the associations between internalizing and externalizing problems and the trajectory of polysubstance use, controlling for demographic variables.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Five trajectory groups were identified: (1) No to minimal polysubstance use risk (45.6 %); (2) Polysubstance use—low risk (10.7 %); (3) Cigarette-leading polysubstance use—high risk (23.5 %); (4) Cigarette-cannabis co-leading polysubstance use—high risk (12.3 %); and (5) Cannabis-leading polysubstance use—high risk (7.8 %). Compared with Group 1, higher internalizing problems predicted the membership of Group 3 [Relative risk ratio (RRR) range: 1.07–1.17] and Group 4 (RRR range: 1.04–1.21). Compared with Group 1, higher externalizing problems predicted the membership of Group 5 (RRR range: 1.01–1.10).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Prevention efforts should consider internalizing problems and associated trajectories of high-risk polysubstance use (e.g., cigarette-leading and cigarette-cannabis co-leading) as well as externalizing problems and associated trajectories of high-risk polysubstance use (e.g., cannabis-leading), when designing interventions to prevent polysubstance use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7155,"journal":{"name":"Addictive behaviors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addictive behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306460324001850","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Polysubstance use among adults has been a public health concern in the U.S. and is associated with adverse consequences. This study aimed to identify the longitudinal trajectory of polysubstance use and test whether internalizing and externalizing problems predict it.

Methods

Data of adults aged 18 and older (N = 15076) were extracted from the Waves 1–5 Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study (2013–2019). Group-Based Trajectory Modeling was performed to identify the trajectory of polysubstance use. Examined substances included use of cigarettes, e-cigarettes, excessive alcohol, cannabis, painkillers, and cocaine in past 30 days from all waves. Weighted multinomial logistic regressions were conducted to investigate the associations between internalizing and externalizing problems and the trajectory of polysubstance use, controlling for demographic variables.

Results

Five trajectory groups were identified: (1) No to minimal polysubstance use risk (45.6 %); (2) Polysubstance use—low risk (10.7 %); (3) Cigarette-leading polysubstance use—high risk (23.5 %); (4) Cigarette-cannabis co-leading polysubstance use—high risk (12.3 %); and (5) Cannabis-leading polysubstance use—high risk (7.8 %). Compared with Group 1, higher internalizing problems predicted the membership of Group 3 [Relative risk ratio (RRR) range: 1.07–1.17] and Group 4 (RRR range: 1.04–1.21). Compared with Group 1, higher externalizing problems predicted the membership of Group 5 (RRR range: 1.01–1.10).

Conclusions

Prevention efforts should consider internalizing problems and associated trajectories of high-risk polysubstance use (e.g., cigarette-leading and cigarette-cannabis co-leading) as well as externalizing problems and associated trajectories of high-risk polysubstance use (e.g., cannabis-leading), when designing interventions to prevent polysubstance use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多种物质使用的轨迹:过去一年的内化和外化问题是否与长期使用多种物质的轨迹有关?
目的:在美国,成年人使用多种药物一直是一个公共卫生问题,并与不良后果相关。本研究旨在确定多种药物使用的纵向轨迹,并检验内化和外化问题是否能预测多种药物使用:从第 1-5 波烟草与健康人群评估研究(2013-2019 年)中提取了 18 岁及以上成年人的数据(N = 15076)。采用基于群体的轨迹模型来确定多种物质使用的轨迹。研究对象包括所有波次中过去 30 天内使用香烟、电子烟、过量酒精、大麻、止痛药和可卡因的情况。在控制人口统计学变量的情况下,我们进行了加权多项式逻辑回归,以研究内化和外化问题与多种物质使用轨迹之间的关联:结果:确定了五个轨迹组:(1) 无或极少使用多种物质风险组(45.6%);(2) 使用多种物质低风险组(10.7%);(3) 香烟主导多种物质使用高风险组(23.5%);(4) 香烟大麻共同主导多种物质使用高风险组(12.3%);(5) 大麻主导多种物质使用高风险组(7.8%)。与第一组相比,较高的内化问题预示着第三组[相对风险比(RRR)范围:1.07-1.17]和第四组(RRR 范围:1.04-1.21)的成员资格。与第 1 组相比,较高的外化问题预示着第 5 组的成员资格(相对风险比范围:1.01-1.10):结论:在设计预防多种物质使用的干预措施时,应考虑内化问题和高风险多种物质使用的相关轨迹(如香烟引导和香烟大麻共同引导),以及外化问题和高风险多种物质使用的相关轨迹(如大麻引导)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Addictive behaviors
Addictive behaviors 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
283
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Addictive Behaviors is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing high quality human research on addictive behaviors and disorders since 1975. The journal accepts submissions of full-length papers and short communications on substance-related addictions such as the abuse of alcohol, drugs and nicotine, and behavioral addictions involving gambling and technology. We primarily publish behavioral and psychosocial research but our articles span the fields of psychology, sociology, psychiatry, epidemiology, social policy, medicine, pharmacology and neuroscience. While theoretical orientations are diverse, the emphasis of the journal is primarily empirical. That is, sound experimental design combined with valid, reliable assessment and evaluation procedures are a requisite for acceptance. However, innovative and empirically oriented case studies that might encourage new lines of inquiry are accepted as well. Studies that clearly contribute to current knowledge of etiology, prevention, social policy or treatment are given priority. Scholarly commentaries on topical issues, systematic reviews, and mini reviews are encouraged. We especially welcome multimedia papers that incorporate video or audio components to better display methodology or findings. Studies can also be submitted to Addictive Behaviors? companion title, the open access journal Addictive Behaviors Reports, which has a particular interest in ''non-traditional'', innovative and empirically-oriented research such as negative/null data papers, replication studies, case reports on novel treatments, and cross-cultural research.
期刊最新文献
From individual motivation to substance use initiation: A longitudinal cohort study assessing the associations between reward sensitivity and subsequent risk of substance use initiation among US adolescents Similarities and differences in core symptoms of problematic smartphone use among Chinese students enrolled in grades 4 to 9: A large national cross-sectional study Online social support and problematic Internet Use—a meta-analysis Adult attachment, social anxiety, and problematic social media use: A meta-analysis and meta-analytic structural equation model Not always as advertised: Different effects from viewing safer gambling (harm prevention) adverts on gambling urges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1