Laterality of Radiation Therapy in Breast Cancer is Not Associated With Increased Risk of Coronary Artery Disease in the Contemporary Era

IF 2.2 Q3 ONCOLOGY Advances in Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1016/j.adro.2024.101583
Lakshya Seth BA , Omar Makram MD, MPH , Amr Essa MD , Vraj Patel BS , Stephanie Jiang BS , Aditya Bhave BS , Sandeep Yerraguntla BS , Gaurav Gopu BS , Sarah Malik MD , Justin Swaby BS , Johnathon Rast MD , Caleb A. Padgett BS, MS, PhD , Ahmed Shetewi BS , Priyanshu Nain MBBS , Neal Weintraub MD , Eric D. Miller MD, PhD , Susan Dent MD , Ana Barac MD, PhD , Rakesh Shiradkar PhD , Anant Madabhushi PhD , Avirup Guha MBBS, MPH
{"title":"Laterality of Radiation Therapy in Breast Cancer is Not Associated With Increased Risk of Coronary Artery Disease in the Contemporary Era","authors":"Lakshya Seth BA ,&nbsp;Omar Makram MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Amr Essa MD ,&nbsp;Vraj Patel BS ,&nbsp;Stephanie Jiang BS ,&nbsp;Aditya Bhave BS ,&nbsp;Sandeep Yerraguntla BS ,&nbsp;Gaurav Gopu BS ,&nbsp;Sarah Malik MD ,&nbsp;Justin Swaby BS ,&nbsp;Johnathon Rast MD ,&nbsp;Caleb A. Padgett BS, MS, PhD ,&nbsp;Ahmed Shetewi BS ,&nbsp;Priyanshu Nain MBBS ,&nbsp;Neal Weintraub MD ,&nbsp;Eric D. Miller MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Susan Dent MD ,&nbsp;Ana Barac MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Rakesh Shiradkar PhD ,&nbsp;Anant Madabhushi PhD ,&nbsp;Avirup Guha MBBS, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is a critical component of breast cancer (BC) therapy. Given the improvement in technology in the contemporary era, we hypothesized that there is no difference in the development of or worsening of existing coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with BC receiving left versus right-sided radiation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>For the meta-analysis portion of our study, we searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus and included studies from January 1999 to September 2022. CAD was identified using a homogenous metric across multiple studies included. We computed the risk ratio (RR) for included studies using a random effects model. For the institutional cohort portion of our study, we selected high cardiovascular-risk patients who received diagnoses of BC between 2010 and 2022 if they met our inclusion criteria. We performed a Cox proportional hazards model with stepwise adjustment.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A pooled random effects model with 9 studies showed that patients with left-sided BC receiving EBRT had a 10% increased risk of CAD when compared with patients with right-sided BC receiving EBRT (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.02-1.18; <em>P</em> = .01). However, subgroup analysis of 6 studies that included patients diagnosed after 1980 did not show a significant difference in CAD based on BC laterality (RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.95-1.20; <em>P</em> = .27). For the institutional cohort portion of the study, we found that patients with left-sided BC who received EBRT did not have a significantly higher risk of CAD when compared with their right-sided counterparts (hazard ratios [HR], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.34-1.54; <em>P</em> = .402).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our study suggests a historical trend of increased CAD in BC patients receiving left-sided EBRT. Data from patients diagnosed after 2010 in our institutional cohort did not show a significant difference<strong>,</strong> emphasizing that modern EBRT regimens are safe, and laterality of BC does not affect CAD outcomes in the short term after a BC diagnosis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 10","pages":"Article 101583"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001465/pdfft?md5=e908916277c36e28869dd8a4ad4866e1&pid=1-s2.0-S2452109424001465-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is a critical component of breast cancer (BC) therapy. Given the improvement in technology in the contemporary era, we hypothesized that there is no difference in the development of or worsening of existing coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with BC receiving left versus right-sided radiation.

Methods and Materials

For the meta-analysis portion of our study, we searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus and included studies from January 1999 to September 2022. CAD was identified using a homogenous metric across multiple studies included. We computed the risk ratio (RR) for included studies using a random effects model. For the institutional cohort portion of our study, we selected high cardiovascular-risk patients who received diagnoses of BC between 2010 and 2022 if they met our inclusion criteria. We performed a Cox proportional hazards model with stepwise adjustment.

Results

A pooled random effects model with 9 studies showed that patients with left-sided BC receiving EBRT had a 10% increased risk of CAD when compared with patients with right-sided BC receiving EBRT (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.02-1.18; P = .01). However, subgroup analysis of 6 studies that included patients diagnosed after 1980 did not show a significant difference in CAD based on BC laterality (RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.95-1.20; P = .27). For the institutional cohort portion of the study, we found that patients with left-sided BC who received EBRT did not have a significantly higher risk of CAD when compared with their right-sided counterparts (hazard ratios [HR], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.34-1.54; P = .402).

Conclusions

Our study suggests a historical trend of increased CAD in BC patients receiving left-sided EBRT. Data from patients diagnosed after 2010 in our institutional cohort did not show a significant difference, emphasizing that modern EBRT regimens are safe, and laterality of BC does not affect CAD outcomes in the short term after a BC diagnosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳腺癌放射治疗的偏侧与当代冠状动脉疾病风险的增加无关
目的 外照射放射治疗(EBRT)是乳腺癌(BC)治疗的重要组成部分。鉴于当代技术的进步,我们假设接受左侧放疗与右侧放疗的乳腺癌患者在冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的发生或恶化方面没有差异。方法和材料在研究的荟萃分析部分,我们搜索了 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Scopus,纳入了 1999 年 1 月至 2022 年 9 月的研究。在纳入的多项研究中,我们使用同质的指标来识别 CAD。我们使用随机效应模型计算了纳入研究的风险比 (RR)。在研究的机构队列部分,我们选择了 2010 年至 2022 年期间确诊为 BC 的心血管高危患者,只要他们符合我们的纳入标准。结果9项研究的随机效应模型显示,与右侧BC接受EBRT的患者相比,左侧BC接受EBRT的患者患CAD的风险增加10%(RR,1.10;95% CI,1.02-1.18;P = .01)。然而,对包括 1980 年后确诊患者的 6 项研究进行的亚组分析并未显示基于 BC 侧位的 CAD 显著差异(RR,1.07;95% CI,0.95-1.20;P = .27)。在研究的机构队列部分,我们发现接受 EBRT 的左侧 BC 患者与右侧患者相比,患 CAD 的风险并没有明显增加(危险比 [HR],0.73;95% CI,0.34-1.54;P = .402)。我们机构队列中 2010 年后确诊的患者数据未显示出显著差异,这强调了现代 EBRT 方案是安全的,BC 的侧位在确诊 BC 后短期内不会影响 CAD 的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Radiation Oncology
Advances in Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of Advances is to provide information for clinicians who use radiation therapy by publishing: Clinical trial reports and reanalyses. Basic science original reports. Manuscripts examining health services research, comparative and cost effectiveness research, and systematic reviews. Case reports documenting unusual problems and solutions. High quality multi and single institutional series, as well as other novel retrospective hypothesis generating series. Timely critical reviews on important topics in radiation oncology, such as side effects. Articles reporting the natural history of disease and patterns of failure, particularly as they relate to treatment volume delineation. Articles on safety and quality in radiation therapy. Essays on clinical experience. Articles on practice transformation in radiation oncology, in particular: Aspects of health policy that may impact the future practice of radiation oncology. How information technology, such as data analytics and systems innovations, will change radiation oncology practice. Articles on imaging as they relate to radiation therapy treatment.
期刊最新文献
Benefit of Avasopasem Manganese on Severe Oral Mucositis in Head and Neck Cancer in the ROMAN Trial: Unplanned Secondary Analysis A Predictive Nomogram for Development of Lymph Node Metastasis in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Therapy Outcomes After Stereotactic Body Radiation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Child-Pugh A Versus Child-Pugh B/C Cirrhosis Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Brain Metastases and Concomitant Listeria Monocytogenes Brain Abscesses Editorial board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1