Selection for proton radiotherapy of grade 1–3 glioma patients

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100836
C.S. Byskov , A. Muhic , R.H. Dahlrot , C.A. Haslund , T.L. Guldberg , M. Høyer , P.W. Nyström , L. Dysager , S. Hansen , L. Haldbo-Classen , A.K. Trip , Y. Lassen-Ramshad , B. Weber , S. Lukacova , C.R. Hansen , J.F. Kallehauge
{"title":"Selection for proton radiotherapy of grade 1–3 glioma patients","authors":"C.S. Byskov ,&nbsp;A. Muhic ,&nbsp;R.H. Dahlrot ,&nbsp;C.A. Haslund ,&nbsp;T.L. Guldberg ,&nbsp;M. Høyer ,&nbsp;P.W. Nyström ,&nbsp;L. Dysager ,&nbsp;S. Hansen ,&nbsp;L. Haldbo-Classen ,&nbsp;A.K. Trip ,&nbsp;Y. Lassen-Ramshad ,&nbsp;B. Weber ,&nbsp;S. Lukacova ,&nbsp;C.R. Hansen ,&nbsp;J.F. Kallehauge","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>For adult patients with grade 1–3 gliomas, identifying patients with an indication for proton therapy (PT) can be challenging due to sparse evidence supporting its benefits. In this study, we aimed to ensure national consensus and develop a decision support tool to aid clinicians in identifying patients with grade 1–3 gliomas eligible for PT.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Sixty-one historic patients referred for postoperative radiotherapy for glioma grade 1–3 were included in this study and had new photon therapy and PT plans calculated. These plans along with clinical parameters were presented to neurooncologists with experience in treating brain tumours. The patients were presented at three workshops (WSs), where each neurooncologist individually had to choose between photon and proton therapy. Important parameters were selected using cross validation. Multivariable logistic regression was used to predict the neurooncologists’ treatment modality choice.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>At the three WSs 23, 24 and 19 randomly selected patients were presented. Seventy-five percent of the neurooncologists agreed for 14 patients (61%), 16 patients (67%) and 15 patients (79%) at WS1, WS2 and WS3. Age at radiotherapy and difference in mean dose (ΔDmean) to the residual brain were significant predictors of the choice of treatment modality, p &lt; 0.001. Model coefficients were: β<sub>age</sub> = 0.07 per year (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.05–0.09), and β<sub>Δdose</sub> = -0.27 per Gy (95% CI=-0.36--0.18).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Higher degree of agreement was reached. Age and ΔDmean to the residual brain significantly predicted the choice of radiation modality. We have developed a decision support model which may aid in the selection of patients with glioma grade 1–3 to PT.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":"48 ","pages":"Article 100836"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824001137/pdfft?md5=dd160cbc5f24e84debded99aaa55d76b&pid=1-s2.0-S2405630824001137-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824001137","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

For adult patients with grade 1–3 gliomas, identifying patients with an indication for proton therapy (PT) can be challenging due to sparse evidence supporting its benefits. In this study, we aimed to ensure national consensus and develop a decision support tool to aid clinicians in identifying patients with grade 1–3 gliomas eligible for PT.

Methods

Sixty-one historic patients referred for postoperative radiotherapy for glioma grade 1–3 were included in this study and had new photon therapy and PT plans calculated. These plans along with clinical parameters were presented to neurooncologists with experience in treating brain tumours. The patients were presented at three workshops (WSs), where each neurooncologist individually had to choose between photon and proton therapy. Important parameters were selected using cross validation. Multivariable logistic regression was used to predict the neurooncologists’ treatment modality choice.

Results

At the three WSs 23, 24 and 19 randomly selected patients were presented. Seventy-five percent of the neurooncologists agreed for 14 patients (61%), 16 patients (67%) and 15 patients (79%) at WS1, WS2 and WS3. Age at radiotherapy and difference in mean dose (ΔDmean) to the residual brain were significant predictors of the choice of treatment modality, p < 0.001. Model coefficients were: βage = 0.07 per year (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.05–0.09), and βΔdose = -0.27 per Gy (95% CI=-0.36--0.18).

Conclusion

Higher degree of agreement was reached. Age and ΔDmean to the residual brain significantly predicted the choice of radiation modality. We have developed a decision support model which may aid in the selection of patients with glioma grade 1–3 to PT.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择 1-3 级胶质瘤患者接受质子放疗
背景对于患有 1-3 级胶质瘤的成人患者来说,由于支持质子治疗(PT)获益的证据稀少,确定患者是否符合质子治疗的适应症可能具有挑战性。在本研究中,我们旨在确保达成全国共识并开发一种决策支持工具,以帮助临床医生确定符合质子治疗条件的 1-3 级胶质瘤患者。方法本研究纳入了 61 名转诊接受术后放疗的 1-3 级胶质瘤患者,并计算了新的光子治疗和质子治疗计划。这些计划和临床参数已提交给具有脑肿瘤治疗经验的神经肿瘤专家。患者在三个研讨会(WSs)上接受治疗,每个神经肿瘤学家都必须在光子治疗和质子治疗之间做出选择。重要参数通过交叉验证选出。结果在三次研讨会上,分别随机抽取了 23、24 和 19 名患者。在 WS1、WS2 和 WS3 中,75% 的神经肿瘤学家同意 14 名患者(61%)、16 名患者(67%)和 15 名患者(79%)的治疗方案。放疗时的年龄和残脑平均剂量(ΔDmean)的差异对治疗方式的选择有显著的预测作用(p < 0.001)。模型系数为β年龄=0.07/年(95% 置信区间 [CI] =0.05-0.09),βΔ剂量=-0.27/Gy(95% CI=-0.36--0.18)。年龄和残脑ΔD均值可显著预测放射方式的选择。我们建立了一个决策支持模型,可帮助选择 1-3 级胶质瘤患者进行 PT 治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
40 days
期刊最新文献
Avoiding prostate bed radiation for the PSMA-PET detected nodal recurrence patient post prostatectomy Bridging the care gap: patients’ needs and experiences regarding shared decision-making in radiotherapy Tumor sequencing before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: Genetic tumor characterization and clinical outcome Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of brainstem metastases – Clinical outcome and prognostic factors Stereotactic body radiation therapy in primary liver tumor: Local control, outcomes and toxicities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1