Implementation and evaluation of a proactive consultation-liaison model on an inpatient obstetric unit

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY General hospital psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.08.003
Lindsay G. Lebin , Parvaneh K. Nouri , Melissa A. Kwitowski , Allison G. Dempsey , Jacob A. Lebin , Sarah Nagle-Yang
{"title":"Implementation and evaluation of a proactive consultation-liaison model on an inpatient obstetric unit","authors":"Lindsay G. Lebin ,&nbsp;Parvaneh K. Nouri ,&nbsp;Melissa A. Kwitowski ,&nbsp;Allison G. Dempsey ,&nbsp;Jacob A. Lebin ,&nbsp;Sarah Nagle-Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Perinatal mental and anxiety disorders (PMADs) contribute to adverse health outcomes, though they are underrecognized and undertreated. Inpatient obstetric settings represent a unique opportunity for behavioral health engagement, including screening, brief treatment, and referrals for outpatient care. The proactive consultation-liaison (CL) model has proven effective in general hospital settings but is not well-studied in obstetric settings. This article describes the implementation and evaluation of a proactive CL model in an inpatient obstetric unit within a tertiary medical center.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We implemented a multidisciplinary, proactive CL model in an inpatient obstetric unit with the purpose of identifying patients at risk for or experiencing PMADs and providing intervention and/or referral to treatment. Systematic screening of 7322 admitted patients was performed over a 17-month period to identify eligible patients for behavioral health consultation. Consultation data was retrospectively extracted from the electronic medical record. Key implementation outcomes were assessed using a RE-AIM measures (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>1589 initial consults were conducted by the multidisciplinary team, yielding a consult rate of 21.7 %. The majority of consults (94 %) were completed by a social worker or psychologist, with most patients identified for consultation at multidisciplinary rounds (60.7 %). The most common indications for consultation with a psychiatrist included medication management, history of bipolar disorder, and history of anxiety. All invited staff and providers participated in the model. Alternative funding sources agreed to cover the salaries of the multidisciplinary team following conclusion of pilot grant funding.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A proactive CL model implemented in an inpatient obstetric unit led to a higher consult rate (21.7 %) than is observed with traditional CL services. A multidisciplinary proactive CL model shows promise in identifying people at-risk for PMADs and providing targeted interventions to prevent PMADs and treat those with active symptoms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12517,"journal":{"name":"General hospital psychiatry","volume":"90 ","pages":"Pages 124-131"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General hospital psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163834324001725","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Perinatal mental and anxiety disorders (PMADs) contribute to adverse health outcomes, though they are underrecognized and undertreated. Inpatient obstetric settings represent a unique opportunity for behavioral health engagement, including screening, brief treatment, and referrals for outpatient care. The proactive consultation-liaison (CL) model has proven effective in general hospital settings but is not well-studied in obstetric settings. This article describes the implementation and evaluation of a proactive CL model in an inpatient obstetric unit within a tertiary medical center.

Methods

We implemented a multidisciplinary, proactive CL model in an inpatient obstetric unit with the purpose of identifying patients at risk for or experiencing PMADs and providing intervention and/or referral to treatment. Systematic screening of 7322 admitted patients was performed over a 17-month period to identify eligible patients for behavioral health consultation. Consultation data was retrospectively extracted from the electronic medical record. Key implementation outcomes were assessed using a RE-AIM measures (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework.

Results

1589 initial consults were conducted by the multidisciplinary team, yielding a consult rate of 21.7 %. The majority of consults (94 %) were completed by a social worker or psychologist, with most patients identified for consultation at multidisciplinary rounds (60.7 %). The most common indications for consultation with a psychiatrist included medication management, history of bipolar disorder, and history of anxiety. All invited staff and providers participated in the model. Alternative funding sources agreed to cover the salaries of the multidisciplinary team following conclusion of pilot grant funding.

Conclusions

A proactive CL model implemented in an inpatient obstetric unit led to a higher consult rate (21.7 %) than is observed with traditional CL services. A multidisciplinary proactive CL model shows promise in identifying people at-risk for PMADs and providing targeted interventions to prevent PMADs and treat those with active symptoms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产科住院部主动咨询联络模式的实施与评估
目标产前精神和焦虑障碍(PMADs)是导致不良健康后果的原因之一,尽管它们未得到充分认识和治疗。产科住院环境为行为健康参与提供了独特的机会,包括筛查、简短治疗和门诊转诊。积极主动的咨询联络(CL)模式已被证明在综合医院环境中有效,但在产科环境中却没有得到充分研究。本文介绍了在一家三级医疗中心的产科住院部实施和评估主动会诊联络模式的情况。方法我们在产科住院部实施了多学科主动会诊联络模式,目的是识别有PMAD风险或正在经历PMAD的患者,并提供干预和/或转诊治疗。在17个月的时间里,对7322名入院患者进行了系统筛查,以确定符合行为健康咨询条件的患者。从电子病历中回顾性地提取了咨询数据。采用 RE-AIM 衡量标准(覆盖、效果、采用、实施和维持)框架对主要实施结果进行了评估。结果 1589 次初步咨询由多学科团队进行,咨询率为 21.7%。大多数咨询(94%)由社工或心理学家完成,大多数患者是在多学科查房时被确定咨询的(60.7%)。向精神科医生咨询的最常见指征包括药物治疗、双相情感障碍病史和焦虑病史。所有受邀人员和医疗服务提供者都参与了该模式。在试点资助结束后,其他资金来源同意支付多学科团队的工资。结论在产科住院部实施的主动性CL模式导致了比传统CL服务更高的咨询率(21.7%)。多学科前瞻性CL模式在识别PMAD高危人群、提供有针对性的干预措施以预防PMAD和治疗有活动症状的人群方面显示出前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
General hospital psychiatry
General hospital psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
125
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: General Hospital Psychiatry explores the many linkages among psychiatry, medicine, and primary care. In emphasizing a biopsychosocial approach to illness and health, the journal provides a forum for professionals with clinical, academic, and research interests in psychiatry''s role in the mainstream of medicine.
期刊最新文献
The effect of inhaled aromatherapy on cognitive function in patients with cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Establishment and clinical impacts of decision-support system for older patients with aortic valve stenosis: A retrospective observational study. Development and validation of the BRief Eating Disorder Screener (BREDS) for US veterans in healthcare and community settings. Understanding years of life lost to psychiatric disorders: A review and recommendations for further research. Psychiatric comorbidity in eating disorders: The urgency of an integrated approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1