Laura S Graham, Nicholas C Henderson, Olesia Kellezi, Clara Hwang, Pedro C Barata, Mehmet A Bilen, Deepak Kilari, Michael Pierro, Bicky Thapa, Abhishek Tripathi, George Mo, Matthew Labriola, Joseph J Park, Shoshana Rothstein, Rohan Garje, Vadim S Koshkin, Vaibhav G Patel, Tanya Dorff, Andrew J Armstrong, Rana R McKay, Ajjai Alva, Michael T Schweizer
{"title":"DNA-Damaging Therapies in Patients With Prostate Cancer and Pathogenic Alterations in Homologous Recombination Repair Genes.","authors":"Laura S Graham, Nicholas C Henderson, Olesia Kellezi, Clara Hwang, Pedro C Barata, Mehmet A Bilen, Deepak Kilari, Michael Pierro, Bicky Thapa, Abhishek Tripathi, George Mo, Matthew Labriola, Joseph J Park, Shoshana Rothstein, Rohan Garje, Vadim S Koshkin, Vaibhav G Patel, Tanya Dorff, Andrew J Armstrong, Rana R McKay, Ajjai Alva, Michael T Schweizer","doi":"10.1200/PO.24.00014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Outcomes data for DNA-damaging therapeutics for men with prostate cancer (PC) and non-<i>BRCA1/2</i> homologous recombination repair (HRR) mutations are limited. We evaluated outcomes by HRR alteration in men with PC treated with poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) and/or platinum chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective data from the PROMISE consortium were used. Clinical outcomes differences were assessed between patients with <i>BRCA1</i>/<i>2</i> mutations (cohort A) and those with HRR mutations without direct BRCA complex interaction (cohort B: <i>ATM</i>, <i>CDK12</i>, <i>CHEK1</i>, <i>CHEK2</i>, and <i>FANCL</i>). Outcomes in patients with HRR mutations with direct BRCA complex interaction were also explored (cohort C: <i>RAD51B/C/D</i>, <i>RAD54L2</i>, <i>BARD1</i>, <i>GEN1</i>, <i>PALB2</i>, <i>FANCA</i>, and <i>BRIP1</i>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and forty-six patients received PARPi (cohort A: 94, cohort B: 45, cohort C: 7) and 104 received platinum chemotherapy (cohort A: 48, cohort B: 44, cohort C: 10). PSA50 response rate to PARPi was higher in cohort A (61%) than cohort B (5%), <i>P</i> < .001. Median clinical/radiographic progression-free survival (crPFS) with PARPi in cohort A was significantly longer than in cohort B: 15.9 versus 8.7 months, <i>P</i> = .005. PSA50 response rate to platinum therapy was higher in cohort A (62%) than in cohort B (32%), <i>P</i> = .024, although crPFS was not significantly different. PSA50 response rate to PARPi and platinum was 40% and 32%, respectively, in cohort C. In multivariable analysis, cohort A had significantly improved overall survival and crPFS compared with cohort B with PARPi but not platinum chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with <i>BRCA1/2</i>-mutated PC had significantly improved outcomes to PARPi but not platinum chemotherapy compared with those with HRR mutations without direct BRCA complex interaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":14797,"journal":{"name":"JCO precision oncology","volume":"8 ","pages":"e2400014"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346579/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO precision oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.24.00014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Outcomes data for DNA-damaging therapeutics for men with prostate cancer (PC) and non-BRCA1/2 homologous recombination repair (HRR) mutations are limited. We evaluated outcomes by HRR alteration in men with PC treated with poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) and/or platinum chemotherapy.
Methods: Retrospective data from the PROMISE consortium were used. Clinical outcomes differences were assessed between patients with BRCA1/2 mutations (cohort A) and those with HRR mutations without direct BRCA complex interaction (cohort B: ATM, CDK12, CHEK1, CHEK2, and FANCL). Outcomes in patients with HRR mutations with direct BRCA complex interaction were also explored (cohort C: RAD51B/C/D, RAD54L2, BARD1, GEN1, PALB2, FANCA, and BRIP1).
Results: One hundred and forty-six patients received PARPi (cohort A: 94, cohort B: 45, cohort C: 7) and 104 received platinum chemotherapy (cohort A: 48, cohort B: 44, cohort C: 10). PSA50 response rate to PARPi was higher in cohort A (61%) than cohort B (5%), P < .001. Median clinical/radiographic progression-free survival (crPFS) with PARPi in cohort A was significantly longer than in cohort B: 15.9 versus 8.7 months, P = .005. PSA50 response rate to platinum therapy was higher in cohort A (62%) than in cohort B (32%), P = .024, although crPFS was not significantly different. PSA50 response rate to PARPi and platinum was 40% and 32%, respectively, in cohort C. In multivariable analysis, cohort A had significantly improved overall survival and crPFS compared with cohort B with PARPi but not platinum chemotherapy.
Conclusion: Patients with BRCA1/2-mutated PC had significantly improved outcomes to PARPi but not platinum chemotherapy compared with those with HRR mutations without direct BRCA complex interaction.