Barriers and facilitators to self-management among women with gestational diabetes: A systematic review using the COM-B model

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Midwifery Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2024.104141
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators to self-management among women with gestational diabetes: A systematic review using the COM-B model","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2024.104141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Gestational diabetes mellitus is a common complication during pregnancy, and its prevalence rates have increased dramatically in recent years. Treatment of gestational diabetes requires the active self-management, however, this can be challenging. Understanding the barriers and facilitators of adherence to self-management recommendations is essential for designing effective interventions.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To identify and synthesize barriers and facilitators to self-management of gestational diabetes reported by pregnant women.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a mixed-methods systematic review, including qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies. A literature search was conducted in four databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and the Web of Science). Eligible studies explored the barriers and/or facilitators, experiences and/or perceptions to engage in self-management in women with gestational diabetes. The Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour model was used to classify barriers and facilitators affecting self-management.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-six studies (23 qualitative, 11 quantitative, and 2 mixed-methods) met the inclusion criteria. We identified barriers and facilitators relating to capability (e.g., physical discomforts and constraints; lack of knowledge of GDM and self-management behaviours; forgetfulness), opportunity (e.g., limited education and resources; social support from family, friends, and peer groups; conflict with existing lifestyles or cultural norms), and motivation (e.g., perceived negative consequence of self-management behaviours or not perceived benefits; negative emotion; concern the health of the baby).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In this study, we identified the barriers and facilitators of self-management in women with gestational diabetes, which were explained by relevant theoretical models. Interventions should be developed with full consideration of these findings to ensure that pregnant women have the correct knowledge and confidence to self-manage their complications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824002249","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Gestational diabetes mellitus is a common complication during pregnancy, and its prevalence rates have increased dramatically in recent years. Treatment of gestational diabetes requires the active self-management, however, this can be challenging. Understanding the barriers and facilitators of adherence to self-management recommendations is essential for designing effective interventions.

Aim

To identify and synthesize barriers and facilitators to self-management of gestational diabetes reported by pregnant women.

Methods

This was a mixed-methods systematic review, including qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies. A literature search was conducted in four databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and the Web of Science). Eligible studies explored the barriers and/or facilitators, experiences and/or perceptions to engage in self-management in women with gestational diabetes. The Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour model was used to classify barriers and facilitators affecting self-management.

Results

Thirty-six studies (23 qualitative, 11 quantitative, and 2 mixed-methods) met the inclusion criteria. We identified barriers and facilitators relating to capability (e.g., physical discomforts and constraints; lack of knowledge of GDM and self-management behaviours; forgetfulness), opportunity (e.g., limited education and resources; social support from family, friends, and peer groups; conflict with existing lifestyles or cultural norms), and motivation (e.g., perceived negative consequence of self-management behaviours or not perceived benefits; negative emotion; concern the health of the baby).

Conclusion

In this study, we identified the barriers and facilitators of self-management in women with gestational diabetes, which were explained by relevant theoretical models. Interventions should be developed with full consideration of these findings to ensure that pregnant women have the correct knowledge and confidence to self-manage their complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妊娠糖尿病妇女自我管理的障碍和促进因素:使用 COM-B 模型进行系统回顾。
背景:妊娠糖尿病是孕期常见的并发症,近年来发病率急剧上升。妊娠糖尿病的治疗需要积极的自我管理,但这可能具有挑战性。了解坚持自我管理建议的障碍和促进因素对于设计有效的干预措施至关重要。目的:确定并综合孕妇报告的妊娠糖尿病自我管理的障碍和促进因素:这是一项混合方法的系统性综述,包括定性、定量和混合方法研究。我们在四个数据库(PubMed、Embase、CINAHL 和 Web of Science)中进行了文献检索。符合条件的研究探讨了妊娠糖尿病妇女参与自我管理的障碍和/或促进因素、经验和/或认知。研究采用能力、机会、动机、行为模型对影响自我管理的障碍和促进因素进行分类:36项研究(23项定性研究、11项定量研究和2项混合方法研究)符合纳入标准。我们确定了与能力(如身体不适和制约因素;缺乏对 GDM 和自我管理行为的了解;健忘)、机会(如教育和资源有限;来自家庭、朋友和同龄群体的社会支持;与现有生活方式或文化规范的冲突)和动机(如认为自我管理行为会带来负面影响或没有感觉到好处;负面情绪;对婴儿健康的担忧)有关的障碍和促进因素:在这项研究中,我们确定了妊娠糖尿病妇女自我管理的障碍和促进因素,并通过相关理论模型对其进行了解释。在制定干预措施时,应充分考虑到这些发现,以确保孕妇拥有正确的知识和信心来自我管理并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
期刊最新文献
Maternal experiences and preference of maternity services in Singapore: A descriptive qualitative study. Breastfeeding self-efficacy in mothers: The body image and emotional intelligence perspective Perspectives of health care providers on obstetric point-of-care ultrasound in lower-level health facilities in Kenya. Clinical decision-making during childbirth in health facilities from the perspectives of labouring women, relatives, and health care providers: A scoping review. Perceived stress and prenatal depression symptoms among couples with gestational diabetes mellitus: The mediating role of dyadic coping
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1