Functional network characteristics in anxiety- and mania-based subgroups of bipolar I disorder

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2024.111868
Adriana P. C. Hermans , Dennis J. L. G. Schutter , Richard A. I. Bethlehem
{"title":"Functional network characteristics in anxiety- and mania-based subgroups of bipolar I disorder","authors":"Adriana P. C. Hermans ,&nbsp;Dennis J. L. G. Schutter ,&nbsp;Richard A. I. Bethlehem","doi":"10.1016/j.pscychresns.2024.111868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Bipolar disorder I (BD-I) is a heterogeneous disorder with a high prevalence of comorbid anxiety. The aim of this study was to investigate whether anxiety and mania symptoms define distinct subgroups within BD-I and to explore potential differences in functional network characteristics between these subgroups.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Subgroups were identified using scores from clinical anxiety and mania scales. After dimension reduction of these scores, data-driven clustering analysis with cross-validation was employed to reveal the existence of subgroups. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) scans were pre-processed using fMRIPrep. After parcellation and network construction, global and regional graph theoretical measures were calculated per subgroup.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Clustering results revealed that, based on anxiety symptomatology, subjects fell into two distinct subgroups, whereas mania symptoms divided subjects into four unique subgroups. These subgroups varied notably on several symptom scales. Network assortativity was significantly associated with anxiety subgroups. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons did not reveal significant global functional network differences between the anxiety subgroups or between mania subgroups. Regional network differences between clinical subgroups were especially apparent for strength and degree in the temporal and frontal lobes.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>Small sample size of some subgroups is a limitation of this study as is the categorical rather than continuous representation of anxiety and mania symptoms.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>BD-I populations may be stratified into robust subgroups based on anxiety and mania symptoms, showing differences in functional network connectivity. Our findings highlight new avenues of research for investigating heterogeneity in psychiatric populations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20776,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging","volume":"344 ","pages":"Article 111868"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092549272400091X/pdfft?md5=33e5f02d749139163a7210db76c2fc8f&pid=1-s2.0-S092549272400091X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092549272400091X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Bipolar disorder I (BD-I) is a heterogeneous disorder with a high prevalence of comorbid anxiety. The aim of this study was to investigate whether anxiety and mania symptoms define distinct subgroups within BD-I and to explore potential differences in functional network characteristics between these subgroups.

Methods

Subgroups were identified using scores from clinical anxiety and mania scales. After dimension reduction of these scores, data-driven clustering analysis with cross-validation was employed to reveal the existence of subgroups. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) scans were pre-processed using fMRIPrep. After parcellation and network construction, global and regional graph theoretical measures were calculated per subgroup.

Results

Clustering results revealed that, based on anxiety symptomatology, subjects fell into two distinct subgroups, whereas mania symptoms divided subjects into four unique subgroups. These subgroups varied notably on several symptom scales. Network assortativity was significantly associated with anxiety subgroups. Post-hoc pairwise comparisons did not reveal significant global functional network differences between the anxiety subgroups or between mania subgroups. Regional network differences between clinical subgroups were especially apparent for strength and degree in the temporal and frontal lobes.

Limitations

Small sample size of some subgroups is a limitation of this study as is the categorical rather than continuous representation of anxiety and mania symptoms.

Conclusions

BD-I populations may be stratified into robust subgroups based on anxiety and mania symptoms, showing differences in functional network connectivity. Our findings highlight new avenues of research for investigating heterogeneity in psychiatric populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于焦虑和躁狂的双相情感障碍 I 亚组的功能网络特征
背景躁郁症 I(BD-I)是一种异质性疾病,合并焦虑症的发病率很高。本研究旨在调查焦虑和躁狂症状是否定义了 BD-I 中的不同亚组,并探讨这些亚组之间功能网络特征的潜在差异。方法利用临床焦虑和躁狂量表的评分确定亚组,在对这些评分进行降维处理后,采用交叉验证的数据驱动聚类分析来揭示亚组的存在。使用 fMRIPrep 对静息态功能磁共振成像(rs-fMRI)扫描进行预处理。结果聚类结果显示,根据焦虑症状,受试者分为两个不同的亚组,而躁狂症状则将受试者分为四个独特的亚组。这些亚组在多个症状量表上存在显著差异。网络同源性与焦虑亚组有明显的关联。事后配对比较并未发现焦虑亚组或躁狂亚组之间存在明显的整体功能网络差异。临床亚组之间的区域网络差异在颞叶和额叶的强度和程度上尤为明显。结论BD-I人群可根据焦虑和躁狂症状被划分为不同的亚组,并显示出功能网络连接的差异。我们的发现凸显了研究精神病人群异质性的新途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
22.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Neuroimaging section of Psychiatry Research publishes manuscripts on positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, computerized electroencephalographic topography, regional cerebral blood flow, computed tomography, magnetoencephalography, autoradiography, post-mortem regional analyses, and other imaging techniques. Reports concerning results in psychiatric disorders, dementias, and the effects of behaviorial tasks and pharmacological treatments are featured. We also invite manuscripts on the methods of obtaining images and computer processing of the images themselves. Selected case reports are also published.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Sex differences in inter-temporal decision making and cortical thickness of the orbitofrontal and insula in young adult cannabis users: Evidence from 1111 subjects Reward functioning in posttraumatic stress disorder, metabolic syndrome, and psychological resilience Resting state functional connectivity in adolescents with substance use disorder and their unaffected siblings The association between eye movement characteristics and cognitive function in adolescents with major depressive disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1