Thomsen, L., 2023, A logical error in Gassmann poroelasticity: Geophysical Prospecting, 71, 649–663. by Leon Thomsen, University of Houston

IF 1.8 3区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Geophysical Prospecting Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1111/1365-2478.13567
{"title":"Thomsen, L., 2023, A logical error in Gassmann poroelasticity: Geophysical Prospecting, 71, 649–663. by Leon Thomsen, University of Houston","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/1365-2478.13567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Two figure captions in this paper were in error, confusing compressibility and incompressibility (the figures themselves were correct). The proper figure captions are</p><p>FIGURE 2. Comparison of Berea sandstone data from Hart and Wang (2010) for <i>K</i><sub>ud</sub> − <i>K</i><sub>fm</sub> (as functions of differential pressure, <i>p<sub>d</sub></i> = <i>p</i> − <i>p<sub>F</sub></i>) with predictions from Gassmann theory (Equation 1, using data for <i>K<sub>𝑆</sub></i> (from Equation 14; see also the unnumbered equation from B&amp;K following Equation 17), or from VRH theory), and from B&amp;K theory (Equation 19, using data for <i><span>K</span><sub>𝑆</sub></i> and for <i>κ<sub>M</sub></i> (from Equation 21)). The Fluid (water) incompressibility <i>K<sub>F</sub></i> is taken as 2.3 GPa.</p><p>FIGURE 4. Comparison of Indiana limestone data from Hart and Wang (2010) for <i>K</i><sub>ud</sub> − <i>K</i><sub>fm</sub> (as functions of differential pressure, <i>p<sub>d</sub></i> = <i>p</i> − <i>p<sub>F</sub></i>) with predictions from Gassmann theory (Equation 1, using data for <i>K<sub>S</sub></i> (from Equation 14; see also the unnumbered equation from B&amp;K following Equation 17), or from VRH theory), and from B&amp;K theory (Equation 19, using data for <i><span>K</span><sub>𝑆</sub></i> and <i>κ<sub>M</sub></i> (from Equation 21)). The Fluid (water) incompressibility <i>K<sub>F</sub></i> is taken as 2.3 GPa.</p>","PeriodicalId":12793,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Prospecting","volume":"72 7","pages":"2857"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1365-2478.13567","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Prospecting","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2478.13567","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two figure captions in this paper were in error, confusing compressibility and incompressibility (the figures themselves were correct). The proper figure captions are

FIGURE 2. Comparison of Berea sandstone data from Hart and Wang (2010) for KudKfm (as functions of differential pressure, pd = ppF) with predictions from Gassmann theory (Equation 1, using data for K𝑆 (from Equation 14; see also the unnumbered equation from B&K following Equation 17), or from VRH theory), and from B&K theory (Equation 19, using data for K𝑆 and for κM (from Equation 21)). The Fluid (water) incompressibility KF is taken as 2.3 GPa.

FIGURE 4. Comparison of Indiana limestone data from Hart and Wang (2010) for KudKfm (as functions of differential pressure, pd = ppF) with predictions from Gassmann theory (Equation 1, using data for KS (from Equation 14; see also the unnumbered equation from B&K following Equation 17), or from VRH theory), and from B&K theory (Equation 19, using data for K𝑆 and κM (from Equation 21)). The Fluid (water) incompressibility KF is taken as 2.3 GPa.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Thomsen, L., 2023, A logical error in Gassmann poroelasticity:地球物理勘探》,71, 649-663.
本文有两幅图的标题有误,混淆了可压缩性和不可压缩性(图本身是正确的)。正确的图表标题为:图 2.Hart 和 Wang(2010 年)关于 Kud - Kfm(作为压差的函数,pd = p - pF)的 Berea 砂岩数据与 Gassmann 理论(等式 1,使用 K𝑆 的数据(来自等式 14;另见 B&K 在等式 17 之后的未编号等式)或 VRH 理论的预测)以及 B&K 理论(等式 19,使用 K𝑆 和 κM 的数据(来自等式 21))的预测的比较。流体(水)不可压缩性 KF 取为 2.3 GPa。Hart 和 Wang(2010 年)关于 Kud - Kfm(作为压差的函数,pd = p - pF)的印第安纳石灰石数据与 Gassmann 理论(等式 1,使用 KS 的数据(来自等式 14;另见 B&K 等式 17 之后的未编号等式)或 VRH 理论)以及 B&K 理论(等式 19,使用 K𝑆 和 κM 的数据(来自等式 21))的预测结果的比较。流体(水)不可压缩性 KF 取为 2.3 GPa。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geophysical Prospecting
Geophysical Prospecting 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.50%
发文量
118
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Geophysical Prospecting publishes the best in primary research on the science of geophysics as it applies to the exploration, evaluation and extraction of earth resources. Drawing heavily on contributions from researchers in the oil and mineral exploration industries, the journal has a very practical slant. Although the journal provides a valuable forum for communication among workers in these fields, it is also ideally suited to researchers in academic geophysics.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Simultaneous inversion of four physical parameters of hydrate reservoir for high accuracy porosity estimation A mollifier approach to seismic data representation Analytic solutions for effective elastic moduli of isotropic solids containing oblate spheroid pores with critical porosity An efficient pseudoelastic pure P-mode wave equation and the implementation of the free surface boundary condition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1