Comparison of Clinical Outcomes in the Slow-Developing Blastocysts With or Without Preimplantation Genetic Testing-Aneuploidy on Day 6 in the Frozen–Thawed Cycle

IF 2 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102644
Hee Jun Lee MD, PhD , Jae Eun Park MD , Jihye Jeong MS , Tae Hyung Kim BS , Sola Yoon MS , Jisoo Han PhD , Jin Hee Eum PhD , Hyelim Sung MD , Youngsok Choi PhD , Woo Sik Lee MD, PhD
{"title":"Comparison of Clinical Outcomes in the Slow-Developing Blastocysts With or Without Preimplantation Genetic Testing-Aneuploidy on Day 6 in the Frozen–Thawed Cycle","authors":"Hee Jun Lee MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jae Eun Park MD ,&nbsp;Jihye Jeong MS ,&nbsp;Tae Hyung Kim BS ,&nbsp;Sola Yoon MS ,&nbsp;Jisoo Han PhD ,&nbsp;Jin Hee Eum PhD ,&nbsp;Hyelim Sung MD ,&nbsp;Youngsok Choi PhD ,&nbsp;Woo Sik Lee MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study investigated the potential of the slow-developing blastocysts using preimplantation genetic testing-aneuploidy (PGT-A) in patients undergoing frozen–thawed embryo transfer, stratified by age.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective analysis was performed including a total of 743 cycles, the first frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle with single embryo transfer, who underwent treatment between January 2020 and July 2023 in a single fertility centre, Gangnam CHA Fertility Center. A total of 743 cycles, in which we performed intracellular sperm injection and freeze-all strategy, from 743 patients were included. The patient group was divided into 4 groups as follows: group 1 (G1), 208 FET on day 5; group 2 (G2), 177 FET with PGT-A on day 5; group 3 (G3), 220 FET on day 6; group 4 (G4), 138 FET with PGT-A on day 6. We also divided into 2 groups—under 35 years of age and over 35 years of age—and performed the analysis separately for each group.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the under 35 years of age group, there were no significant differences in clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates in G1 and G2 (67.2% vs. 63.8%, not statistically significantly different). Also, G4 had a higher clinical pregnancy rate than G3, but it was not significant (51.8% vs. 54.7%, not statistically significantly different). In the 35 years or older group, G2 had higher pregnancy rates than G1 and lower miscarriage rates (clinical pregnancy rate: 43.3% vs. 67.7%, <em>P</em> = 0.001, miscarriage rate: 22.5% vs. 3.4%, <em>P</em> = 0.001). In addition, G4 had a higher pregnancy rate than G3 and a lower miscarriage rate (clinical pregnancy rate: 31.8% vs. 46.9%, <em>P</em> = 0.003, miscarriage rate: 22.9% vs. 2.2%, <em>P</em> = 0.023).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In the under-35-year-old group, PGT-A on day 5 and day 6 showed a high pregnancy rate and a low miscarriage rate. Therefore, using PGT-A seems advantageous for patients of an advanced maternal age.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16688,"journal":{"name":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1701216324004675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study investigated the potential of the slow-developing blastocysts using preimplantation genetic testing-aneuploidy (PGT-A) in patients undergoing frozen–thawed embryo transfer, stratified by age.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed including a total of 743 cycles, the first frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle with single embryo transfer, who underwent treatment between January 2020 and July 2023 in a single fertility centre, Gangnam CHA Fertility Center. A total of 743 cycles, in which we performed intracellular sperm injection and freeze-all strategy, from 743 patients were included. The patient group was divided into 4 groups as follows: group 1 (G1), 208 FET on day 5; group 2 (G2), 177 FET with PGT-A on day 5; group 3 (G3), 220 FET on day 6; group 4 (G4), 138 FET with PGT-A on day 6. We also divided into 2 groups—under 35 years of age and over 35 years of age—and performed the analysis separately for each group.

Results

In the under 35 years of age group, there were no significant differences in clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates in G1 and G2 (67.2% vs. 63.8%, not statistically significantly different). Also, G4 had a higher clinical pregnancy rate than G3, but it was not significant (51.8% vs. 54.7%, not statistically significantly different). In the 35 years or older group, G2 had higher pregnancy rates than G1 and lower miscarriage rates (clinical pregnancy rate: 43.3% vs. 67.7%, P = 0.001, miscarriage rate: 22.5% vs. 3.4%, P = 0.001). In addition, G4 had a higher pregnancy rate than G3 and a lower miscarriage rate (clinical pregnancy rate: 31.8% vs. 46.9%, P = 0.003, miscarriage rate: 22.9% vs. 2.2%, P = 0.023).

Conclusions

In the under-35-year-old group, PGT-A on day 5 and day 6 showed a high pregnancy rate and a low miscarriage rate. Therefore, using PGT-A seems advantageous for patients of an advanced maternal age.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冷冻解冻周期第 6 天植入前遗传学检测-非整倍体与未植入前遗传学检测-发育缓慢的囊胚临床结果的比较。
研究目的本研究采用植入前遗传学检测-非整倍体(PGT-A)对接受冻融胚胎移植的患者中发育缓慢的囊胚的潜力进行了调查,并按年龄进行了分层:研究进行了一项回顾性分析,共纳入了 743 例在 2020 年 1 月至 2023 年 7 月期间在 XXXX 生育中心接受治疗的首次冷冻胚胎移植(FET)周期的单胚胎移植(SET)患者。我们共纳入了 743 例患者的 743 个周期,在这些周期中,我们进行了细胞内精子注射并冻结了所有策略。患者分为以下 4 组:第 1 组(G1),第 5 天进行 208 次 FET;第 2 组(G2),第 5 天进行 177 次 FET 并使用 PGT-A;第 3 组(G3),第 6 天进行 220 次 FET;第 4 组(G4),第 6 天进行 138 次 FET 并使用 PGT-A。我们还将患者分为两组--35 岁以下组和 35 岁以上组,并对每组分别进行了分析:在 35 岁以下组中,G1 和 G2 的临床妊娠率和流产率无明显差异(67.2% vs 63.8%,NS)。此外,G4 的临床妊娠率高于 G3,但差异不显著(51.8% vs 54.7%,NS)。在 35 岁或以上组中,G2 的妊娠率高于 G1,流产率较低(CPR:43.3% vs 67.7%,P = 0.001;MR:22.5% vs 3.4%,P = 0.001)。此外,G4 的妊娠率高于 G3,流产率较低(CPR:31.8% vs. 46.9%,P = 0.003;MR:22.9% vs. 2.2%,P = 0.023):在年龄≥35 岁组中,第 5 天和第 6 天的 PGT-A 显示了较高的妊娠率和较低的流产率。因此,使用 PGT-A 似乎对高龄产妇有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
302
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada (JOGC) is Canada"s peer-reviewed journal of obstetrics, gynaecology, and women"s health. Each monthly issue contains original research articles, reviews, case reports, commentaries, and editorials on all aspects of reproductive health. JOGC is the original publication source of evidence-based clinical guidelines, committee opinions, and policy statements that derive from standing or ad hoc committees of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. JOGC is included in the National Library of Medicine"s MEDLINE database, and abstracts from JOGC are accessible on PubMed.
期刊最新文献
AN ILEAL MESENTERIC LEIOMYOMA - A RARE EXTRAUTERINE SITE. Higher Risk of Wound Complications but no Clinically Significant Increase in Operative Time for Smokers Receiving Myomectomy for Uterine Fibroids. Indications for Transfer and Care Pathways of Inuit Transferred to a Tertiary Center for Childbirth in Quebec, Canada: A Retrospective Chart Review 2015-2019. Recognizing Endometrial Cancer Risks in Perimenopausal and Postmenopausal Experiences: insights from community qualitative interviews and workshop. Guideline No. 456: Prenatal Screening for Fetal Chromosomal Anomalies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1